Indigenous Brazilian Children Are First in World to Get Paediatric Malaria Treatment 23/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan Brazilian children from the Yanomami indigenous community will be the first to get paediatric treatment for malaria. Brazilian children from the Yanomami indigenous community will be the first in the world to get a single-dose paediatric treatment for relapsing malaria. The introduction of paediatric tafenoquine, developed by Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) and pharmaceutical company GSK, marks a “major step” towards closing the treatment gap for children at risk of relapsing Plasmodium vivax (P. vivax) malaria, according to MMV. Tafenoquine only needs to be taken once, replacing older medicines taken daily for seven days. This is especially important in remote areas, where following through with longer regimens can be challenging. Brazil incorporated a child-friendly formulation of tafenoquine into its public health system in mid-2025. It is approved for children from two years of age, and taken in combination with chloroquine to cure P. vivax malaria, the less deadly but most widespread malaria species. Illegal mining, deforestation drive malaria Malaria cases in the Yanomami Indigenous Territory have surged 300% between 2016 and 2022, where illegal mining has driven deforestation and a dramatic resurgence of the disease carried by mosquitoes. The Yanomami are the largest indigenous people in the country, living in villages within the Amazon rainforest on the border of Venezuela and Brazil. Brazil declared malaria a public health emergency in the area in 2023. “The rollout of paediatric tafenoquine addresses a long‑standing gap in malaria care for children, particularly in remote and underserved settings. This initiative strengthens our national elimination efforts while centring children’s health,” said Alex Vargas from Brazil’s Ministry of Health. “Between 2019 and 2022, over 21,000 malaria cases were recorded among Yanomami children under the age of five, alongside a sevenfold increase in malaria‑related child deaths over four years,” according to MMV. “In a population of around 30,000 people, these figures underscore the devastating impact of malaria and the urgent need for a well‑tolerated, effective treatment for the youngest and most at risk.” MMV CEO Dr Martin Fitchet said that, ‘for too long, younger patients have remained vulnerable to debilitating relapse simply because existing treatments were hard to complete. “The rollout of paediatric tafenoquine among the Yanomami marks a major step toward more equitable access to effective malaria treatment.” If someone is infected with P. vivax and does not receive liver-stage treatment, they will be at risk of repeated clinical relapses. But tafenoquine can cause haemolytic anaemia in people with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, so G6PD testing must be performed before it is prescribed, which complicates the rollout. Tafenoquine is the first new drug to be developed in over 60 years to treat relapsing malaria. Brazil was the first malaria-endemic country to adopt tafenoquine for adults into its public health system in 2023. Rollout to adults began in June 2024. and by April 2025, it covered 49 municipalities from six states and nine Special Indigenous Health Districts (DSEIs). In the first quarter of 2025, Brazil recorded a 26.8% drop in all malaria cases. Rondônia, one of the first states to introduce tafenoquine treatment, saw a 47% decrease in malaria cases during the first four months of 2025 compared to the same period the previous year, and 95% of all its malaria cases during this period were P. vivax. Image Credits: Nathalie Brasil/ MMV. Extreme Heat is Pushing Food Production to the Brink, Warns World Metereological Organization 22/04/2026 Disha Shetty Extreme heat waves linked to a warming planet are having a devastating impact on crops, warns WMO in its latest report. Extreme heat threatens livelihoods, health and labour productivity for over a billion people around the world, warns the latest report from the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Agricultural workers and the food production systems that they manage are on the frontlines. The increased intensity and duration of climate change-related heat waves, driven largely by the indiscriminate burning of fossil fuels, poses a direct risk to crop and livestock production, fisheries – and the health of workers who must work long hours outdoors during extreme heat to manage those systems, warned the report, published on Earth Day, observed every April 22. “This work highlights how extreme heat is a major risk multiplier, exerting mounting pressure on crops, livestock, fisheries and forests, and on the communities and economies that depend upon them,” said FAO Director-General QU Dongyu. The report titled “Extreme heat and agriculture,” prepared in collaboration with Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), assessed risks as well as adaptation options. Among the latter, early warning systems can help farmers prepare for extreme heat, the report stresses. It also urges countries to look at options such as selective breeding of crops to prioritize more drought- and heat-resistant plants, and make those more widely accessible to farmers. “Extreme heat is increasingly defining the conditions under which agrifood systems operate,” said WMO Secretary-General Celeste Saulo. Risks to the agrifood systems set to soar Agriculture workers are on the frontlines of extreme heat. The frequency, intensity and duration of extreme heat events have risen sharply over the past half century, WMO said, leading to soaring risks. “More than simply an isolated climatic hazard, it [heat] acts as a compounding risk factor that magnifies existing weaknesses across agricultural systems. Early warnings and climate services like seasonal outlooks are vital to help us adapt to the new reality,” WMO’s Saulo said. Apart from its direct impacts, extreme heat when combined with droughts, wildfires, water stress, and pests has an escalating impact on production, the report cautioned. Wide-ranging impacts – crops, fishes, livestock and humans The impact of extreme heat on humans has received more attention in recent years – but the way in which heatwaves have also affecting crop and fish production and therefore prices, has received less attention. The extent of the impact of extreme heat is different relative to the context of when and where they occur. For livestock, heat stress begins when the temperatures exceed 25°C. The threshold is even lower for chickens and pigs, as they are unable to cool themselves by sweating. In 2025, more than 90% of the ocean’s global expanses experienced at least one marine heatwave, according to the WMO’s State of the Global Climate 2025 report. When heat rises in water bodies, it leads to a reduction in the presence of dissolved oxygen, making the fish struggle to maintain their respiration rates. As a result, they can suffer from cardiac failure, and production declines. For most major agricultural crops, yield declines begin to occur above 30°C; but it is lower for some crops such as potatoes and barley. Evidence also points to a strong correlation between heat waves and wildfires, with longer and more intense fire seasons. Agricultural labourers are hardest hit due to extreme heat as the number of days each year when it is simply too hot. The number of extreme heat days may soon rise to 250 per year in much of South Asia, tropical Sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Central and South America by the end of this century, according to the report. Also read: ILO: Excessive Heat Linked to Climate Change Affects 70% of Workers Key insights for policymakers When heat combines with water stress or drought, the impacts compound, according to WMO report. Along with more selective development of climate-resistant plant and animal species, the report highlighted the need for adjustments in planting windows and altered water management practices, so that crops and agricultural activities can be sheltered from the impacts of extreme heat. The report also urges countries to improve access to financial services like cash transfers, insurance and payment schemes, and other climate shock-resilient social protection schemes for agrifood workers. Innovative insurance schemes are currently being tested in developing countries like India, but their effectiveness is yet to be proven. “Protecting the future of agriculture and ensuring global food security will require not only building on-farm resilience but also exercising international solidarity and collective political will for risk sharing, and a decisive transition away from a high-emissions future,” the report says. Image Credits: WMO, Extreme heat and agriculture report. Researchers Dispute US Government’s Upbeat Data About PEPFAR’s Impact on HIV 22/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan PEPFAR funded 80% of the running costs of Luyengo Clinic in Eswatini, and the HIV treatment of 3,000 clients was distrupted when the US froze foreign aid. Researchers have challenged several upbeat claims made by the United States government about the continued impact of the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). The US State Department claims that PEPFAR has sustained its impact on HIV despite the service disruptions and funding cuts introduced by the Trump administration. In a data release covering 1 July through 31 September (the fourth quarter of the US budget cycle), the US government reports that PEPFAR supported 20,6 million people in over 50 countries on anti-retroviral (ARV) treatment. They note that this is “stable from the same FY 2024 reporting period”. “Three million people now receive treatment from national governments rather than external PEPFAR implementers,” with two million “successfully transitioned” during the fourth quarter alone, according to a statement from the US State Department’s Bureau of Global Health Security and Diplomacy (GHSD). PEPFAR initiated 103,000 pregnant and breastfeeding women on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), “more than double the 43,000 from a year ago”, according to the GHSD. PrEP involves HIV negative people taking ARVs to prevent infection. While the GHSD acknowledges a decline in the number of children on HIV treatment – from 643,627 in 2022 to 508,703 in 2025 – it attributes this to “tremendous progress” in prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT). Historically, however, HIV positive children are hard to reach, and only slightly over half of children under the age of 15 who are living with HIV are actually on ARVs, according to UNICEF. “The message is clear: we cut overall spending by 30% while preserving critical frontline HIV care and eliminating wasteful programs. This proves the America First Global Health Strategy works,” according to the GHSD. ‘Substantial disruptions’ But researchers – from AmFAR, the Foundation for AIDS Research, and the International AIDS Society (IAS) – argue in a preprint article that there have been “substantial disruptions across PEPFAR service areas”. Their analysis is based on both the newly released fourth quarter figures plus data from “an earlier inadvertent release [that] included all four quarters.” It covers 31,746 facilities and community service sites, which the researchers classify according to their reporting records as “continuous” (71.3%, who submitted reports every month), “intermittent” (16.9%, submitting some reports) and “community services” (2.5%). They report a “modest” 0,3% decline in people accessing HIV treatment, which is similar to the State Department assertion. But the researchers – Brian Honermann, Elise Lankiewicz, Jennifer Sherwood and Greg Millett from AmFAR and Anna Grimsrud from IAS – assert that this stable figure “obscures substantial changes”. The “continuous facilities” rebounded to slightly above their 2024 level as they maintained “at least some level of support from PEPFAR and are primarily owned and operated by ministries of health”. (Around three-quarters of PEPFAR-supported facilities in 2024 were government facilities.) They describe access to treatment as a “lagging indicator” of the overall health system performance because stable patients on treatment “already have strong routines in place for continually collecting medication.” Decline in testing, PrEP and health workers A Zimbabwean health worker administers an HIV test. The drop in HIV testing portends future weaknesses. There was an overall 17% decline in HIV testing – the gateway to ensuring people with HIV are on treatment – resulting in a 16% decrease in the number of people initiated on ARV treatment. Infant HIV testing declined by 6%, and infant diagnoses declined by 12% in the “continuous facilities”. There was a precipitous decline of 60% in testing and 31% in diagnosis in the “intermittent facilities”. “The significant declines in HIV testing, diagnoses, treatment initiations, and treatment retention programming, however, raise serious concerns for countries’ capacity to maintain progress toward the 95-95-95 targets – the United Nations target of 95% of people with HIV knowing their status; 95% on ARVs and 95% virally suppressed, adopted in 2021. PrEP initiations declined by 33% – largely as the Trump administration has designated PrEP for pregnant and breastfeeding women, rather than the “key populations” most at risk of HIV. The PEPFAR-supported workforce was reduced by 22% between 2024 and 2025, a loss of some 76,051 jobs. Instability, grant cancellation The researchers – Brian Honermann, Elise Lankiewicz, Jennifer Sherwood and Greg Millett from AmFAR and Anna Grimsrud from IAS – recount the damage to PEPFAR starting from Trump’s executive order on 20 January, freezing all foreign aid disbursements. This was followed by a stop work order on 24 January 24 for all foreign aid awards, including PEPFAR. “Following this period, a series of waivers allowed for the partial resumption of PEPFAR programming, including a PEPFAR-specific waiver that permitted a defined subset of HIV care, treatment, and prevention of mother-to-child transmission services to continue,” they note. But “the subsequent months were characterized by considerable instability, including cycles of award cancellations and reinstatements, legal challenges to the freeze, and the permanent dissolution of USAID, which was one of two major PEPFAR implementing agencies.” They point to other research that has modelled the calamitous impact of these disruptions on the fight against HIV. The last PEPFAR data? They also acknowledge that the full implications of the foreign aid review have been “difficult to assess” as the US government has released “no official list of terminated and active awards post-review”. However, they also note that “this is potentially the last data set PEPFAR will ever release”. “Under the terms of the memoranda of understanding (MOUs) that the US State Department is currently signing with partner governments, public disclosure of data from those data sets is prohibited, including with external researchers, academics, or advocacy organizations,” they note. “Without public data sets that enable national, sub-national, facility-level, and implementing mechanism level scrutiny, it is virtually impossible for external oversight and accountability to take place, whether within the US government or outside it.” Image Credits: UNAIDS, UNICEF Zimbabwe. Africa and Europe Announce €100 Million in Joint Initiatives to Strengthen Health Systems 21/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan German Ambassador to Ethiopia Birgitt Ory, Africa CDC Director General Dr Jean Kaseya, Jozef Síkela, European Commissioner for International Partnerships, and Ethiopian Health Minister Dr Mekdes Daba. The African Union and the European Commission have concluded three agreements worth €100 million aimed at strengthening Africa’s health systems. The first initiative supports the national public health institutes of 10 African countries to enhance disease surveillance, early warning systems, emergency response, research and laboratory services. The second, announced at the One Health Summit in Leon earlier this month, involves addressing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and developing a workforce trained in a ‘One Health’ approach to detect and prevent health threats in animals, humans and the environment. The third involves expanding digital health solutions for pandemic preparedness and stronger primary healthcare systems in six African countries. The initiatives were officially launched at the African Union headquarters on Tuesday by Jozef Síkela, European Commissioner for International Partnerships, and Dr Jean Kaseya, Director General of Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, which is the operational partner for the initiatives. “Health remains at the top of the EU’s political agenda, including in the shifting geopolitical landscape. While the others are stepping away, we are stepping up,” Sikela told the launch. “Recent history showed us that a health crisis in one region can turn very quickly into a global emergency, an economic crisis and a security threat. Investing in global health is a strategic investment, not a gesture.” Kaseya said that the support will assist the continent to achieve its Health Security and Sovereignty Agenda, “strengthening its capacity to build resilient health systems, improve preparedness, and reduce dependency by producing, financing and managing more of its own health priorities.” Sikela told the launch that the EU and AU are also working on a global health resilience initiative, with the aim of launching it in May. “This will be a powerful tool, bringing together research with medical technology and innovation programmes, knowledge transfer and systematic cooperation with regulatory agencies, health systems and highly skilled workforces,” he said. “The aim is to equip and empower health systems worldwide so that they are in a better position to prevent and respond to future crises,” he concluded, adding that this includes European investment in the local manufacturing of vaccines and medicines “to avoid health dependency.” Welcoming the initiatives, Ethiopian Health Minister Dr Mekdes Daba noted that “a crisis in one region can, with alarming speed, become a challenge for the continent and the world. From COVID-19 to mpox and the recent Marburg outbreak, we have learnt that preparedness cannot be deferred.” Regions with Worst Air Pollution Receive Least Amount of Philanthropic Support 21/04/2026 Sophia Samantaroy A new report on the status of philanthropy in air pollution from the Clean Air Fund found spending on preserving air quality heavily skewed in favor of North America, which enjoys cleaner air compared to Africa and Latin America. Less than 0.1% of all philanthropic funding has gone to the fight for clean air. Yet globally, nearly eight million deaths are attributed to the particles and gases that pollute the air – making air pollution the second biggest risk factor for premature death after high blood pressure. “Air pollution is one of the world’s largest public health threats,” said Dr Christa Hasenkopf, senior fellow at the Clean Air Fund (CAF). “And not only do we underfund it, we’re not directing the funds available to where they’re needed most. Africa has twice the population of North America and more than twice the air pollution, yet it receives 35 times less philanthropic air quality funding.” CAF’s report on philanthropic funding in air pollution reveals steep disparities in funding, where regions suffering from the worst polluted air receive the least amount of funding. Worldwide, 99% of people live in environments that exceed the World Health Organization’s (WHO) air quality guidelines. CAF found that between 2019 and 2023, philanthropic funding was heavily skewed towards North America, which received 35% of total outdoor air quality funding – yet thanks to over 50 years of clean air regulation, it broadly enjoys clean air. Meanwhile, Africa and Latin America received only 1% and 2% of funding, respectively. The lack of funding also has implications for air quality monitoring, crucial for protecting public health and guiding policies. Hasenkopf noted that “over a third of countries still don’t monitor their air quality at all. But this is a story about opportunity, not just neglect: even modest philanthropic investments in local capacity can unlock pollution reduction for nearly a billion people.” Philanthropies continue to play a critical role in environmental health, especially as unprecedented aid cuts rock the global aid economy. Africa, parts of Asia neglected Peak air pollution levels in the Indo-Gangetic plain, which includes Nepal, Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan. South Asian countries outside of India have a fraction of air quality funds compared to India. While North America has historically enjoyed the largest portion of philanthropic clean air investments at $165.6 million between 2019 and 2023, India and China have also received a significant share of funding- $77.9 million and $43.4 million respectively. CAF analyzed China and India separately from the rest of the Asia region because, in doing so, their report reveals a broader imbalance within Asia. Several Asian countries, notably Nepal, Bangladesh, and Pakistan, have faced some of the most dangerous air quality levels in the past decade. Pakistan and Bangladesh have ranked first and second for the highest levels of fine particulate matter in the world, according to the Swiss-based air quality organization, IQAir. Yet despite this burden, Asian countries -excluding India and China – received only 7% of outdoor air quality philanthropic funding. An IQAir map highlights the scarcity of monitoring data in poor air quality regions like the African continent. In Africa and Latin America, which are also high-need regions, funding remained “particularly low.” Four of the top 10 most air-polluted countries are in African: Chad, the DRC, Uganda, and Egypt. While Latin America has historically enjoyed cleaner air than its regional counterparts and innovative urban design in its cities, many areas still suffer from a lack of air pollution monitoring. The two regions received only 0.9% and 1.5% of total philanthropic outdoor air quality funding between 2019 and 2023, respectively. Philanthropic air quality funding by region between 2019 and 2023. However, the report notes a positive shift in funding to the Global South. The distribution of outdoor air quality funding grew from $5.1 million to $19.8 million in Asia – excluding China and India – and from $1.5 million to $2.2 million in Africa between 2022 and 2023. These figures are still dwarfed by the funding available in North America, although it is decreasing: from $56.2 million in 2022 to $25.1 million in 2023. “The fact that the funds are going to North America and others, is because communities have organized and demanded clean air,” said Dr Maria Neira, WHO’s former director of the environment, in a statement to Health Policy Watch. “We need to ensure that philanthropies are focusing the resources to create demand from the civil society in the countries most affected,” Neira said. Philanthropies step in to shore up funding A philanthropic success story: A map of the contiguous United States, depicting the efforts of the Sierra Club’s campaign to transition away from coal power plants. Retired plants shown in gray; yellow circles denote partially operating; red show fully operating. Historic aid cuts to global health, environment, and humanitarian assistance during 2025 sent shock waves through these sectors – and have jeopardized the lives of millions. The report acknowledges that philanthropies alone cannot fill the gaps left behind by the US and other governments, “they can ensure vital work can continue.” In the past year, Bloomberg Philanthropies has stepped in to cover the US’s funding for the UN Climate convention, while the Skoll and MacArthur Foundations pledged to increase giving after the dismantlement of USAID. Philanthropies are in a unique position to drive progress on clean air. These groups have the flexibility to take greater risks and fund early-stage innovations, pilots, and advocacy campaigns, the report notes – all without the debt burden typically associated with official government-given development assistance. Philanthropies also provide leadership in the political space through lending evidence, raising awareness of air pollution risks, and lobbying. “While philanthropies cannot fill the entire finance gap on their own, we’ve seen the hugely impactful domino effect they create,” said CAF CEO Jane Burston. “Their investments [accelerate] public policy and catalysing public and private finance.” Most of these projects fall under policy and awareness efforts, though the report highlights the need for technical projects like monitoring. Philanthropies have catalyzed change in the air pollution space for decades. In 2002, the Sierra Club launched its Beyond Coal Campaign, one of the most “extensive, effective, and long-lasting campaigns in the history of the environmental movement.” The campaign has advocated shifting away from coal to more renewable sources. Funding needed for other polluting sectors Young people trained by the Green African Youth Organization (GAYO) in Ghana, sort and divert waste from being burned. Philanthropic funding has primarily focused on the transportation sector, with 61% of funding supporting projects such as bus electrification or protecting pedestrian walkways away from busy roads. Other polluting sectors received a far smaller share of funding, notably the energy sector, agriculture, and the waste management sector. “Diversifying investments across sectors can help address several sources of emissions that significantly affect both health and climate outcomes,” the report argues. The waste management sector in particular could greatly benefit from addressing open air burning of solid waste and reducing methane and black carbon emissions. Burning waste generates toxic plumes of dioxins, furans, and heavy metals. More recent research has also pointed to the practice for releasing microplastics into the air. Several grassroots organizations, like the Green African Youth Organization (GAYO) in Ghana, Botswana, and Uganda, have projects that aim to reduce open-air burning and deploy air quality sensors to track open-burning hotspots. GAYO’s anti-incineration and no-burn campaign has trained more than 100 municipal officers and environmental health workers in community-level enforcement and education across Ghana. Their Zero Waste Cities initiative in Accra has recovered 50 to 75 tonnes of waste per month, diverting materials from both landfills and open burning. Engaging in these sectors beyond transportation – like in clean cooking and agricultural practices such as moving away from crop residue burning –“will be critical for improving public health, reducing inequality, and accelerating progress towards cleaner air and a more sustainable future,” the report argues. A call to increase philanthropic giving Waste workers join protest over air pollution exposure in Delhi. In the past several years, the rate of growth in philanthropic funding in clean air has slowed. While the raw numbers of funds invested have more than doubled between 2019 and 2023, reaching a total of $478 million, philanthropic funding for outdoor air quality is showing “signs of stagnation,” the report warns. Between 2022 and 2023, funding grew by only 2%, from $123.1 million to $125.8 million, the report says. Image Credits: Igor Karimov/ Unsplash, University of Chicago , IQAir, Clean Air Fund , Sierra Club, Clean Air Fund. Microplastics: Brain Study Confirms Health Risks, Challenges Kennedy’s Claims 20/04/2026 Felix Sassmannshausen & Sophia Samantaroy A new study reveals how microplastics are infiltrating human brain tissue. A joint announcement by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Health and Human Services (HHS) on microplastics made inaccurate claims about how many plastic particles exist in the brain, while providing an unclear regulatory plan to address this. But a study published in Nature Health found microplastics in nearly every one of its 191 human brain samples. US Health Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr hailed a federal proposal by the EPA to track microplastics contamination in drinking water earlier this month as “a turning point” in the effort to confront microplastics that have “become embedded in modern life.” Kennedy, the leading figure of the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement claimed that there is roughly a “spoonful of plastic in every human brain,” but a newly published study in the journal Nature Health challenges this alarming statistic – while also finding a proliferation of plastic in human brains. The mainly Chinese and US-affiliated researchers analysed 191 brain tissue samples collected across China, using advanced techniques, including laser direct infrared spectroscopy (LDIR) and pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS), to detect micro- and nanoplastics. They found that human brains actually average 50.3 micrograms per gram of healthy tissue, suggesting actual exposure levels are nearly 100 times – or two orders of magnitude – lower than a contested older study cited by Kennedy. Despite this significantly lower concentration, the new findings notably confirm the presence of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) in 100% of the healthy post-mortem brains analysed and in 99.4% of diseased brains. “This study provides evidence of MNP presence in the living human brain, highlighting a need for further research to understand causal links between MNPs and human disease,” Runting Li and colleagues wrote in the publication released on Monday. The toxic legacy of plastic additives This diagram from the Nature Health study maps the presence of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) in the diseased human brain, detailing median concentrations The threat of micro- and nanoplastics contamination in the brain tissue raises significant concern as they can penetrate the blood-brain barrier, where they are subsequently engulfed by the brain’s immune cells, known as microglia. Because these synthetic particles cannot be biologically degraded, they accumulate within the tissue and can trigger severe oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and chronic neuroinflammation. Furthermore, clinical data from patients with brain cancer reveal a concerning correlation regarding tumour progression. The Nature Health researchers found that a larger microplastic surface area within the tissue was positively associated with faster tumour growth and proliferation. The danger extends beyond the physical particles to the thousands of chemical additives used during manufacturing, such as bisphenols and phthalates, which are known endocrine disruptors linked to a host of chronic diseases. Additionally, the degrading particles act as highly effective carriers for other environmental pollutants, absorbing heavy metals, pesticides, and even viruses to carry these dangerous hitchhikers directly into the human bloodstream. This combined chemical and physical burden drives severe health outcomes. Clinical studies indicate that patients with detectable microplastic contamination in their arterial plaque face a 4.5-fold higher risk of suffering a heart attack, stroke, or death within three years. Validating urgent research needs Experts analysing the new study voiced concerns over potential false positives and laboratory contamination. However, the new study, which was evaluated by independent experts, also faces criticism. Scientists raised concerns about methodological flaws, warning that the imaging techniques likely produced false positives by mistaking human proteins for polyamide and human fats for polyethylene, the world’s most common plastic. In a statement to press evaluating the research, Dr Dieter Fischer, head of the microplastics working group at the Leibniz Institute of Polymer Research in Dresden, Germany, argued it is highly unlikely that the identified particles actually originated from the human tissue samples. He suggested the results are likely to be skewed by laboratory contamination and the fundamental difficulty of distinguishing plastics from natural human hydrocarbons. Conversely, other experts not involved in the study praised the researchers for utilising multiple analytical methods, noting that this dual approach makes the findings significantly more robust than previous research. Dr Martin Wagner, head of the bioanalytical toxicology lab at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, concluded that these new metrics regarding the presence and quantity of microplastics in the brain are much more dependable than prior estimates. Furthermore, neuro-oncology experts stress that the higher plastic concentrations found near brain tumours are merely an association, as aggressive tumours actively destroy the blood-brain barrier to allow external particles to passively accumulate. The Nature Health authors acknowledge this unproven causal relationship, warning that their findings should be interpreted with caution to avoid unnecessary public alarm. Standardising microplastics contamination research Despite efforts to define nanoplastics, there is still no standardised protocol for detection. This warning underscores the necessity of further research and standardisation, as the absence of unified detection and reporting protocols makes it very difficult to compare data across studies and reliably estimate human exposure levels. While studies generally describe microplastics as fragments ranging from one micrometre to five millimetres and nanoplastics as an even smaller subfraction measuring under one micrometre, these smallest particles are frequently neglected in research due to current methodological limitations. “The laboratory methods to study micro- and nanoparticles and their health effects are still evolving,” Dr Rebecca Florsheim, a research physician at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine, noted in a statement to the American Lung Association last month. Recognising that current scientific methods remain limited, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) launched a $144 million initiative called the Systematic Targeting of Microplastics (STOMP)nearlier this month. Led by the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), the programme aims to build gold-standard clinical tests to accurately measure, map and ultimately remove microplastics contamination from the human body. Overlooking exposure routes Experts warn that focusing solely on water may overlook other critical pathways for microplastic exposure, including through inhalation and eating processed foods. While public health experts expressed support for the EPA’s proposal to add microplastics and pharmaceuticals to the draft Sixth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 6) for public drinking water, they warn that the focus on water and attempts to “eliminate microplastics from the human body” are too narrow. The CCL6/CCL does not actually regulate America’s public drinking water but signals that a contaminant “warrants serious scientific attention and may be considered for future regulatory action,” the agency noted. Other experts worry that this focus could lead to different critical exposure routes being overlooked. Environmental groups have urged agencies to prioritise the reduction of synthetic textiles, as these fabrics continuously shed microfibers that contaminate indoor air and are inhaled, and also easily bypass wastewater filtration systems. In addition, research by Dr Samantha Romanick, a scientist at the nonprofit Environmental Working Group (EWG), shows that ultra-processed foods typically contain higher plastic levels than less processed alternatives. This contamination largely occurs during industrial manufacturing, as ingredients undergo multiple processing stages and are continually exposed to shedding plastic from conveyor belts, tubes, and packaging. Furthermore, researchers behind the recent brain study discovered that routine surgical equipment, including plastic syringes and intravenous infusion sets, actively sheds microplastics directly into vulnerable patients. They calculated that a single surgical operation could introduce over 30,000 microplastics directly into the bloodstream, bypassing the gut and lungs entirely. “With the widespread use of plastic-based medical devices, MNP contamination in clinical environments is probably unavoidable,” Runting Li and colleagues warned in their Nature Health paper. They stressed that this direct exposure pathway demands global attention and the urgent establishment of stringent quality-control standards within the healthcare industry. The world’s burden of plastic ingestion Global human consumption of microplastics has now grown to six times the rate in 1990. The scale of global exposure extends far beyond the borders of the United States, as human consumption of microplastics has grown to six times the rate recorded in 1990. This burden falls disproportionately on Southeast Asia, which experiences some of the world’s highest microplastic ingestion rates due to severe contamination within its seafood-rich diets. Advocates claim that addressing this crisis requires shifting the focus away from individual consumer choices or speculative human treatment, and toward stringent corporate accountability and the absolute reduction of plastic use and water regulation. To this end, the global community is looking toward the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on Plastic Pollution, which aims to develop a legally binding international treaty. However, progress on the treaty remains slow as major plastic-producing nations, including the US, strongly oppose limits on plastic production. “While we did not land the treaty text we hoped for, we at UNEP will continue the work against plastic pollution,” said Inger Andersen, executive director of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) at the close of last year’s negotiations. “Pollution that is in our groundwater, in our soil, in our rivers, in our oceans and yes, in our bodies.” Image Credits: European Union, Nature Health, Felix Sassmannshausen/HPW, Andreas Mattern/UFZ via EU Commission, Taichi Nakamura via Unsplash. Bangladesh Tightens Control Over Tobacco But Excludes Smokeless Products 20/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan Around a quarter of Bangladeshi men smoke, which has major health impacts. Bangladesh’s new government has approved a wide-ranging anti-tobacco law that bans advertising, promotion and display across print, electronic, digital and social media, entertainment platforms and points of sale. The Smoking and Tobacco Usage (Control) (Amendment) Law, 2025 also prohibits corporate social responsibility initiatives from using tobacco brand names, logos or trademarks. Cigarette packs have to carry pictorial health warnings covering at least 75% of their surface and include the contact numbers of the national quit line. It also expands smoke-free public places and bans the sale and use of tobacco products within 100 meters of schools, hospitals, clinics and playgrounds. This is one of the first laws passed by the government of Prime Minister Tarique Rahman, who was sworn in last month after winning elections in February. Rahman’s Bangladesh National Party took over from an interim administration installed after an uprising in 2024 removed Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and her Awami League from power. the country has a high prevalence of tobacco use, with an estimated 25% of men in Bangladesh smoking – over 21 million. In 2023, around a quarter of deaths among men and 10% of women’s deaths were caused by tobacco – almost 200,000 people in total, according to the Tobacco Atlas. In addition to the substantial health burden, the annual cost of illness attributable to smoking in Bangladesh is estimated to be 730.63 billion takas (approximately US$5.9 billion). Vapes excluded The law does not cover newer tobacco and nicotine products, including vapes, heated tobacco products, electronic nicotine delivery systems and nicotine pouches. This is despite almost 25% of people using smokeless tobacco products, according to the Tobacco Atlas. Welcoming the law, Gan Quan, Vital Strategies’ senior vice president for tobacco control, urged its quick implementation. “This is a positive step, setting the stage to save millions of lives and deliver economic gains, so we must seize this moment with continued collaboration among government agencies, civil society and public health partners, and continuing public education about the harms caused by tobacco,” he said. “Together, we must remain vigilant against the industry’s attempts to subvert or delay these measures and further strengthen policy to address the regulation of emerging tobacco and nicotine products. There is an urgent need to protect youth in particular from being targeted with these products.” Smita Baruah, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids executive vice-president, said that the new measures “will drive down rates of tobacco use, save lives and protect kids from addiction to tobacco.” “Tobacco companies know that strong tobacco control laws work to stop people from smoking and prevent young people from starting to smoke, so they do everything in their power to undermine lifesaving laws like this. It is crucial that these measures be protected from the interests of the world’s largest tobacco companies,” she added. Image Credits: Simon Reza/ Unsplash. Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Include Access to Safe Abortion Services 20/04/2026 Maggie De Block Although the World Health Organization (WHO) recognises comprehensive abortion care as an essential health service, countries all over the world are tightening access, inspired by the United States. But all this means is worse outcomes for women’s health There is a persistent myth that restricting abortion stops it from happening. What restrictions really do – predictably and tragically – is make abortion unsafe. The WHO reports that around 73 million abortions occur worldwide each year, of which – remarkably – 45% are unsafe. The 2017 WHO–Guttmacher report found that 97% of unsafe abortions occurred in developing countries, particularly in Africa, Asia and Latin America, and WHO’s 2022 abortion care guideline notes that around seven million women in developing countries are treated for complications of unsafe abortion every year. Those are only the women who make it to care. Many do not. A preventable cause of maternal mortality The mortality gap between safe and unsafe abortion is stark. In settings where abortion is safe and legal, deaths are rare; where it is unsafe, the risks rise dramatically because the procedure is carried out by unskilled people or in environments that do not meet minimum medical standards, or both. Maternal deaths due to unsafe abortion are often misclassified and under-reported. A review encompassing the period 2009–20 found that 8% of maternal deaths globally were linked to abortion. In low- and middle-income countries, the impact of unsafe abortion is compounded by weak primary care systems, provider shortages, long travel distances, punitive laws, and stigma. The result is delay, secrecy, shame, and complications that could have been prevented. Put simply: when states fail to provide access to safe care, women do not stop seeking abortions. Rather, they are placed in unnecessary danger, with serious health, social and economic consequences. Safe abortion is a basic human right Access to safe abortion is grounded in international human rights law, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. In Africa, the Maputo Protocol provides an especially important regional anchor for women’s reproductive rights. Many human rights bodies and mechanisms agree that lack of access to quality abortion care risks violating the rights of women and girls, including the right to life; the right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health; the right to benefit from scientific progress and its realisation; the right to decide freely and responsibly on the number, spacing and timing of children; rights to privacy and to freedom from discrimination, and the right to be free from torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment. Human rights bodies have also noted that restrictions on access to abortion affect some women disproportionately. The UN Working Group on Discrimination Against Women in Law and in Practice has observed that “in countries where induced termination of pregnancy is restricted by law and/or otherwise unavailable, safe termination of pregnancy is a privilege of the rich, while women with limited resources have little choice but to resort to unsafe providers.” The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women has expressed particular concern that “rural women are more likely to resort to unsafe abortion than their urban counterparts”. The same is true for adolescents, who frequently lack information. The Committee on the Rights of the Child has urged States “to decriminalise abortion to ensure that girls have access to safe abortion and postabortion services, review legislation with a view to guaranteeing the best interests of pregnant adolescents and ensure that their views are always heard and respected in abortion-related decisions.” Comprehensive abortion care is more than medicines The practical case for ensuring access to abortion services is also strong because the tools already exist. WHO’s 2023 clinical guidance and self-care recommendations recognise medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol as a safe and effective option, and these medicines are included on the WHO Essential Medicines List. The WHO guideline also states that medical abortion can be self-managed using mifepristone plus misoprostol or misoprostol alone where people have accurate information and access to a trained health worker if needed. In resource-constrained settings, that matters enormously. Medication abortion can reduce dependence on scarce specialist infrastructure, make earlier care more feasible, and expand access to rural and other underserved women. But medicines alone are not enough. Women also need quality-assured products, clear information, referral pathways, pain management, and emergency backup if needed. A tablet without a system to support its use is not access. Comprehensive abortion care also includes contraception, counselling and information, timely diagnosis, medical or surgical abortion where appropriate, and post-abortion care for complications after miscarriage or unsafe abortion. Post-abortion care is not an optional extra. Abortion access is shaped by many other policies and practices: access to contraception, laws on marital consent, approaches to gender-based violence, access to adoption services, affordability, provider bias, supply chains, transport, privacy and digital information, religious views, and whether women trust the health system enough to use it. If someone must travel for hours, pay out of pocket, or be shamed and harassed for seeking care, she does not have real access. What governments and donors must do: Reform laws and regulations that criminalise or unduly restrict abortion care. Criminalisation of abortion must end. Punitive laws on women and service providers drive delay, secrecy and unsafe methods. Make mifepristone and misoprostol reliably available and affordable. Registration, procurement, quality assurance and distribution are essential policy choices. Integrate abortion into primary health care and universal health coverage packages. Abortion should not be separate from routine sexual, reproductive and maternal health services. Expand provider training and task-sharing. WHO guidance supports community service models, which are crucial in workforce-constrained settings. Guarantee access to post-abortion care. Even in restrictive settings, treating complications is an absolute minimum standard. Invest in information, privacy and building trust. Women need accurate information and safe pathways into care, with compassion, and without stigma. The choice is political The impact of unsafe abortion on maternal mortality is indisputable. The medicines and standards of care for safe abortion are well established. The rights framework is clear. What remains is a political choice – whether governments, donors and multilateral institutions will treat safe abortion as basic health care or continue to support a hierarchy in which women suffer indignity and die of preventable causes while others pass judgement. Above all, let’s start from this simple premise: women and girls are not vessels for state or religious ideology. They are rights-holders. If governments are serious about realising the right to health and reducing maternal mortality, then safe abortion access must be part of the plan – explicitly, urgently, and at scale. Maggie De Block served as Belgium’s Minister of Social Affairs and Health from 2014 to 2020. She is a medical doctor and a member of the Belgian Chamber of Representatives. Image Credits: Center for Reproductive Rights. ‘A Unique Moment’: New Regional Air Pollution Plans Aim to Cut Health Burden Across Latin America 17/04/2026 Sophia Samantaroy Medellin, Colombia’s second largest city, is located in the northern Andes, where smog becomes trapped through meteorological temperature inversions. The Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO) will soon unveil a new Roadmap on Air Quality and Health, following on from a meeting with countries and other stakeholders in February in Mexico. The PAHO strategy dovetails with an ambitious new regional action plan by the UN Environment Programme – which supports the work of environment ministries. While the high mountains of the Andes might be associated in popular imagination with crystal clear air, in fact, these 4000+ meter high mountains also trap air pollution, smothering cities nestled in their towering ranges. It is visual testimony to the health impacts of an air pollution problem that kills some 370,000 people annually across Latin America and the Caribbean. But Latin American and Caribbean countries are at a “unique moment” in terms of opportunities to improve air quality, marking a critical pivot toward treating air pollution not merely as an environmental byproduct, but as a top-tier public health emergency, according to Juan J Castillo who leads the air quality team at PAHO, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) regional office for the Americas. “We see this action plan as an opportunity to send a strong message to the region, to the ministers of health and the environment, that there is a clear case for health in improving air quality,” said Juan Castillo. His team has been leading the plan’s development while also working to bolster collaboration across Latin America, connecting ministries of the environment and health, and closing the air pollution monitoring gap. Meeting the WHO goal to halve deaths from air pollution by 2040 Latin American cities are already taking climate adaptation measures, like Barranquilla, shown here. But air pollution experts highlight the health benefits of green urban desgin. The action plan comes a year after the World Health Organization’s second conference on Air pollution and health, hosted in Cartagena, Colombia. A core aim of the plan is to create a pathway for meeting the WHO target set out at the Cartagena meeting of halving deaths from air pollution by 2040. At the conference, some 20 countries, including many from the Latin American region, made related pledges. But the action plan aims to mainstream the goal into the plans of health ministries. Over 700 stakeholders gathered in Cartagena, Colombia, for the 2nd WHO Air Pollution and Health in 2025. “This is truly a pivotal point,” Castillo said. “Latin America requires solutions that respond to the specific needs of the region. This is why it is charting its own path towards cleaner air- and one that could inspire other lower- and middle-income nations, fostering further South-South cooperation.” Latin America and the Caribbean already have cleaner air, on average, than hot spots like South East Asia, there is still a long way to go to achieve the World Health Organization quality goals. Some cities in the region actually meet WHO air quality guidelines for particulate matter (PM2.5) and others exceed them “only” by one to two times. However, a number of cities in Chile, Brazil, Bolivia and Peru, have average annual PM2.5 concentrations reaching 3-5 times above WHO guidelines, according to the 2025 report of the Swiss-based monitoring firm, IQ-Air. Lima, Peru is one noteworthy example. The health argument for cleaner skies Local authorities in Lima, Peru promote cycling as part of a sustainable mobility effort. “The evidence shows that there is a huge burden of disease linked to air pollution in the region,” said Castillo. “Air pollution is one of the leading causes of non-communicable diseases and also for all kinds of morbidity, such as asthma attacks, respiratory infections and impaired cognitive development. So we’re focused on using the evidence to help countries make the best decision to achieve their public health goals.” Many countries in Latin America have implemented steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but these climate policies often neglect to consider the health benefits of tackling climate pollutants. These health impact assessments of climate mitigation are crucial and are included in the Organization’s Air Quality and Health Plan for Latin America and the Caribbean, said Castillo. “We need to understand the health gains to bolster the argument for environmental policies and to help with the strategic importance of these policies.” Integrating air quality action on climate change “can be particularly beneficial, as it broadens access to funding and delivers greater public health benefits,” notes a December 2025 regional action strategy by the UNEP-hosted Climate and Clean Air Coalition. Action needed beyond the health sector An all-electric bus in Brasilia is one of many rolled out across Latin America. The CCAC strategy is targeted to ministries of the environment, while the PAHO roadmap focuses on ministries of health. But the two aim to work in tandem to build political will for systemic changes that reduce air pollution. Such changes typically require action on finance, transport, building and household energy systems, urban design and waste management – well beyond the traditional domain of health ministries. In terms of transport, a major air pollution factor, Latin America historically has had stronger public transport systems than many other developing regions, and cities such as Curitiba and Bogota became pioneers in developing Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) as well as cycle networks, which helped reduce emissions from private automobiles. Baranquilla has pioneered several clean transport initiatives, such as electric buses, as shown in a Transformative Urban Mobility Initiative brochure. But too often, BRT systems in the region have remained too dependent on dirty diesel – where cleaner electric systems are needed to really clean up the air further. Now, there is a move to electrify BRT systems in key Latin American cities such as Brasilia, Brazil and Barranquilla, Colombia, supported partly by German development assistance as well as local initiatives. Barranquilla, Colombia, has undergone a massive urban renewal effort with the aim of shifting to a 50% electric bus fleet by 2034. Public transport is being integrated with cycle networks and pedestrian-friendly streets – about 30% of travel is on foot – supporting healthier, more active, and low-emissions mobility. PAHO hopes that more cities can see the health benefits of urban design – and use climate funding for greener cities that foster public health. Closing the monitoring and data gap The new PAHO roadmap advocates for better air quality monitoring to better inform policymakers. Tracking air quality progress has been a challenge for the region. Less than 40% of countries have a government standard for chronic exposure to the most dangerous form of particulate pollution, PM2.5. Without these standards, governments cannot chart further regulation to clean up polluted skies. The region has also struggled with tracking air quality. Only a third of cities in the region have active reference monitoring stations- or local inventories of criteria pollutant emissions, active air management programs, or government-published health impact assessments, according to the most recent regional action plan. And only seven cities have air quality forecasting systems. The data that is available raises several concerns. Of the 58 cities with PM2.5 data, only one city complies with the WHO guideline values. The region of Latin America and the Caribbean has, on average, enjoys cleaner air than South Asia or the African continent. Much of the poorer air quality is in urban centers and the Andean region. “Many cities lack key tools, or those that exist are not operational, up to date, or in use, while their populations remain exposed to harmful pollution levels,” says CCAC in its 2025 regional strategy. A consortium of South American researchers echoed that, in a 2025 review that stated: “South America would greatly benefit from expanded monitoring networks, improved air quality modeling, and detailed health data to better understand exposure–health relationships and multipollutant interactions.” Grassroots organizers like Ana Badillo, a co-founder of the Ecuador-based advocacy group Pacha Ayllu, have also championed access to real-time air quality data through the expanded use by “citizen-scientists” of low-cost air pollution sensors in the capital city of Quito. “This citizen-led monitoring network is designed to empower individuals and communities to better understand the quality of the air they breathe and make informed decisions to protect their health and that of their loved ones,” said Badillo in a recent post. The democratization of data is also central to the new CCAC strategy, which is promoting its AQMx Platform, a digital hub designed to support air quality management exchange and integrate conventional air quality monitoring with low-cost sensor networks, relying more on civil society groups like Pacha Ayllu. Collaborating across sectors At COP30 in Belém in 2025, Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus signaled a historic shift by formalizing the Belém Health Action Plan, highlighting the urgency of climate action for health. With funding an “obvious” challenge for cleaning up Latin America’s air, PAHO and its partners have emphasized the health gains of environmental interventions to help governments understand the strategic importance of such changes. In relation to that, collaboration across the energy and environmental sectors is key, says Castillo, whose office is also working closely with the UNEP-hosted CCAC. Tapping into energy sector investments also means cleaner, more affordable, and reliable energy. The new CCAC strategy targets not only air pollution, but a “triple planetary crisis” – climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution – by focusing on the reduction of “super pollutants” like black carbon and methane a precursor of ground level ozone (O3), as well as a powerful climate pollutant. But black carbon and methane do not remain long in the atmosphere, reductions can yield rapid gains for health as well as climate. By making air quality projects “bankable” for multilateral giants like the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), the plan seeks to move beyond sporadic grants toward a flexible financing architecture that includes green bonds and blended finance. Mexico City: a story of success A combination of Mexico City’s high population, geography, and occasional wildfires have made clean air a challenge for decades. Castillo pointed to the example of Mexico City, which once had some of the most polluted air in the Americas, or even the world, as a story of success. It was grassroots organizations that agitated for clean air protections. “They demanded action,” Castillo said. “And many other places are following suit.” Mexico City has developed a robust air quality monitoring system, NowCast – and one of the most ambitious goals for reducing short-lived climate pollutants in the region. “It has helped enormously in terms of health protection, because we can now warn people much sooner, telling them not to go outside, not to exercise outdoors and to avoid inhaling highly polluted air,” said Sergio Zirath, Mexico’s director general of Industry, Clean Energy and Air Quality Management in an interview with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Mexico has now stepped in to provide technical advice to other countries across the region on clean air solutions. Although this is an effort being led by PAHO, an organization that also includes Canada and the United States, by definition as a strategy for Latin America and the Caribbean, neither are part of this new strategy. “PAHO respects every country’s decision on how they want to manage their policy. Our focus is based on evidence, action and available data,” said Castillo, when asked about the absence of the US from regional clean air activities since the Trump administration took over in January 2025. But in the end, Castillo hopes this strategic plan – an undertaking that still includes 21 countries, civil society, and PAHO – will be more than “just another document.” Instead, he hopes it will provide countries with an opportunity to capitalize on changes already happening in the region – ones that might even clean up the air in the region’s worst-polluted cities suffering from smog buffered by the high Andes. Image Credits: Municipality of Bethlehem, S. Samantaroy/HPW, Partnerships for Health Cities, TUMI, IQAir, IQAir, WHO/PAHO/Karina Zambrana . From Vaccines to Racism: RFK Faces Barrage of Questions in House Committee 16/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan Representative Linda Sanchez (left) questioning Kennedy about the explosion of measles cases under his watch. Undermining vaccines, failing pregnant black women, threatening to remove black children with ADHD from their parents – these were some of the barrage of questions put to United States Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr when he appeared before the House Ways and Means Committee on Thursday. Kennedy was testifying about the Trump administration’s 2027 budget, which proposes to cut the HHS budget by 12,5% – including deep cuts for HIV programmes ($923 million less), maternal and child health ($561m), and mental health ($576m). The Trump 2027 budget also proposes to eliminate $4.3 billion from the US government’s global health budget, which falls under the US State Department. Massive measles increase There has been a 675% increase in measles cases since Kennedy was appointed in February last year, according to US Representative Linda Sanchez. “In 2024, under the Biden administration, there were 258 cases of measles. And in 2025, under your leadership at HHS, this ballooned to over 2,000 [cases]. That’s a 675% increase, and we are now on track to suppress to surpass that this year, with over 1,600 confirmed cases in just three and a half months,” said Sanchez. Pointing to the death last year of a six-year-old unvaccinated girl from measles, the first death of a US child from measles in a decade, Sanchez asked Kennedy whether a measles vaccine could have saved her life. “It’s possible,” Kennedy answered. Robert F Kennedy Jr testifying before the House Ways and Means Committee. Sanchez tore into Kennedy for orchestrating the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) decision to remove its “universal vaccine recommendations for children covering seven immunizations, including things like flu, covid, hepatitis A, hepatitis B and rotavirus.” She also quoted Kennedy’s claim on Fox News last year that the adverse effects from the measles vaccine “cause deaths every year… and causes all the illnesses that measles itself causes.” Sanchez said that “CDC data shows that about 80% of children who died from flu this season were not vaccinated, [and] the anti-vaccine rhetoric you ran on and the anti-vaccine actions you have taken over the last year clearly correlates with the dramatic increases in preventable diseases.” She asked Kennedy repeatedly whether Trump agreed with the CDC decision to “suspend public health messaging on vaccines last February” – but Kennedy dodged the question, claiming Sanchez has “a lot of misinformation”. Representative Mike Thompson said that Kennedy is “helping make diseases deadly again.” “Kids have died because measles is running rampant under your watch, in large part because President Trump allowed your conspiracy theories to run our public health,” said Thompson. Undermining health of black women “Black women are nearly three times more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than white women, yet the Trump administration is undermining black maternal health from all sides,” said Representative Danny Davis, a leader of the Congressional Black Caucus. He cited the Trump administration’s decision to cut $1 trillion from Medicaid, “which pays for 40% of births”, the proposed cuts to maternal and child care for 2027, and cuts to research. “DOGE [Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency] cancelled funds for several research projects that could save countless black mothers, like the Morehouse School of Medicine research on improving the health of black pregnant and postpartum women,” said Davis. “How can we lower black maternal health experiences if we’re cutting funds for these critical programmes, and the administration is saying that you can’t consider race or ethnicity in healthcare?” In response, Kennedy claimed that there had been “tremendous duplication” in programmes and “we are investing huge amounts of money in maternal health.” The US has the highest maternal mortality rate in the developed world. ‘Reparenting’ black children? Representative Terri Sewell (centre) raised Kennedy’s comments that black children on ADHD medication should be “reparented” Describing various comments made by Kennedy as “outlandish and frankly disturbing”, Representative Terri Sewell took issue with his stating during a podcast interview that black children on ADHD medication should be “reparented”. “You said every black kid is now just standardly put on Adderall, SSRIs, benzos, which are known to induce violence, and that those children are going to have to go somewhere to get reparented,” said Sewell, reminding Kennedy that there was a long history of black children being removed from their parents, dating back to slavery. Despite Kennedy’s comments being recorded, he denied making them and said he “doesn’t even know what reparenting means”. Budget chief under pressure Meanwhile, health activists interrupted the testimony of Russell Vought, head of the US Office of Management and Budget (OMB), before the House Budget Committee on Wednesday. Minutes after Vought began his opening statement on the 2027 budget proposal, protesters tood up, holding up posters and shouting slogans accusing the Trump administration of killing people with HIV, and urging the administration to spend the funds Congress has allocated to the US President’s Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (PEPFAR). ”Russell Vought is directly responsible for illegally withholding Congressionally appropriated funds for PEPFAR and related global health initiatives. These funding disruptions have already contributed to preventable deaths and threaten to reverse decades of progress in the fight against HIV worldwide,” said Charles King, CEO of Housing Works, in a statement from the protestors issued by Health Gap. They accuse Vought of “blatant defiance of the will of Congress, which has fully funded PEPFAR programs for FY25 and FY26 over Vought’s objections, including by rejecting $400 million in rescission of PEPFAR funding in 2025.” “The FY27 President’s budget request for HIV and global health would eliminate HIV-specific and all disease-specific programming, while slashing overall global health funding by 46% compared with FY26 levels ($9.4 billion in FY26; $5.4 billion proposed in FY27 the President’s budget request),” according to the statement. “In addition to proposing deadly funding cuts, the FY27 budget request also disparages scientific evidence in global health, particularly regarding highly effective methods of HIV prevention, suggesting elimination of funding for condoms and programs for LGBTQ+ people, who face disproportionately high HIV risk of HIV infection due to criminalization and stigma,” according to the statement. Vought also recently diverted $15 million in USAID funding aimed at lifesaving humanitarian assistance to pay for his personal security, according to Reuters. Vought, former vice-president of the right-wing think tank Heritage Foundation, co-authored Project 2025, the conservative blueprint for governance being followed by the Trump administration. Posts navigation Older posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Extreme Heat is Pushing Food Production to the Brink, Warns World Metereological Organization 22/04/2026 Disha Shetty Extreme heat waves linked to a warming planet are having a devastating impact on crops, warns WMO in its latest report. Extreme heat threatens livelihoods, health and labour productivity for over a billion people around the world, warns the latest report from the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Agricultural workers and the food production systems that they manage are on the frontlines. The increased intensity and duration of climate change-related heat waves, driven largely by the indiscriminate burning of fossil fuels, poses a direct risk to crop and livestock production, fisheries – and the health of workers who must work long hours outdoors during extreme heat to manage those systems, warned the report, published on Earth Day, observed every April 22. “This work highlights how extreme heat is a major risk multiplier, exerting mounting pressure on crops, livestock, fisheries and forests, and on the communities and economies that depend upon them,” said FAO Director-General QU Dongyu. The report titled “Extreme heat and agriculture,” prepared in collaboration with Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), assessed risks as well as adaptation options. Among the latter, early warning systems can help farmers prepare for extreme heat, the report stresses. It also urges countries to look at options such as selective breeding of crops to prioritize more drought- and heat-resistant plants, and make those more widely accessible to farmers. “Extreme heat is increasingly defining the conditions under which agrifood systems operate,” said WMO Secretary-General Celeste Saulo. Risks to the agrifood systems set to soar Agriculture workers are on the frontlines of extreme heat. The frequency, intensity and duration of extreme heat events have risen sharply over the past half century, WMO said, leading to soaring risks. “More than simply an isolated climatic hazard, it [heat] acts as a compounding risk factor that magnifies existing weaknesses across agricultural systems. Early warnings and climate services like seasonal outlooks are vital to help us adapt to the new reality,” WMO’s Saulo said. Apart from its direct impacts, extreme heat when combined with droughts, wildfires, water stress, and pests has an escalating impact on production, the report cautioned. Wide-ranging impacts – crops, fishes, livestock and humans The impact of extreme heat on humans has received more attention in recent years – but the way in which heatwaves have also affecting crop and fish production and therefore prices, has received less attention. The extent of the impact of extreme heat is different relative to the context of when and where they occur. For livestock, heat stress begins when the temperatures exceed 25°C. The threshold is even lower for chickens and pigs, as they are unable to cool themselves by sweating. In 2025, more than 90% of the ocean’s global expanses experienced at least one marine heatwave, according to the WMO’s State of the Global Climate 2025 report. When heat rises in water bodies, it leads to a reduction in the presence of dissolved oxygen, making the fish struggle to maintain their respiration rates. As a result, they can suffer from cardiac failure, and production declines. For most major agricultural crops, yield declines begin to occur above 30°C; but it is lower for some crops such as potatoes and barley. Evidence also points to a strong correlation between heat waves and wildfires, with longer and more intense fire seasons. Agricultural labourers are hardest hit due to extreme heat as the number of days each year when it is simply too hot. The number of extreme heat days may soon rise to 250 per year in much of South Asia, tropical Sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Central and South America by the end of this century, according to the report. Also read: ILO: Excessive Heat Linked to Climate Change Affects 70% of Workers Key insights for policymakers When heat combines with water stress or drought, the impacts compound, according to WMO report. Along with more selective development of climate-resistant plant and animal species, the report highlighted the need for adjustments in planting windows and altered water management practices, so that crops and agricultural activities can be sheltered from the impacts of extreme heat. The report also urges countries to improve access to financial services like cash transfers, insurance and payment schemes, and other climate shock-resilient social protection schemes for agrifood workers. Innovative insurance schemes are currently being tested in developing countries like India, but their effectiveness is yet to be proven. “Protecting the future of agriculture and ensuring global food security will require not only building on-farm resilience but also exercising international solidarity and collective political will for risk sharing, and a decisive transition away from a high-emissions future,” the report says. Image Credits: WMO, Extreme heat and agriculture report. Researchers Dispute US Government’s Upbeat Data About PEPFAR’s Impact on HIV 22/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan PEPFAR funded 80% of the running costs of Luyengo Clinic in Eswatini, and the HIV treatment of 3,000 clients was distrupted when the US froze foreign aid. Researchers have challenged several upbeat claims made by the United States government about the continued impact of the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). The US State Department claims that PEPFAR has sustained its impact on HIV despite the service disruptions and funding cuts introduced by the Trump administration. In a data release covering 1 July through 31 September (the fourth quarter of the US budget cycle), the US government reports that PEPFAR supported 20,6 million people in over 50 countries on anti-retroviral (ARV) treatment. They note that this is “stable from the same FY 2024 reporting period”. “Three million people now receive treatment from national governments rather than external PEPFAR implementers,” with two million “successfully transitioned” during the fourth quarter alone, according to a statement from the US State Department’s Bureau of Global Health Security and Diplomacy (GHSD). PEPFAR initiated 103,000 pregnant and breastfeeding women on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), “more than double the 43,000 from a year ago”, according to the GHSD. PrEP involves HIV negative people taking ARVs to prevent infection. While the GHSD acknowledges a decline in the number of children on HIV treatment – from 643,627 in 2022 to 508,703 in 2025 – it attributes this to “tremendous progress” in prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT). Historically, however, HIV positive children are hard to reach, and only slightly over half of children under the age of 15 who are living with HIV are actually on ARVs, according to UNICEF. “The message is clear: we cut overall spending by 30% while preserving critical frontline HIV care and eliminating wasteful programs. This proves the America First Global Health Strategy works,” according to the GHSD. ‘Substantial disruptions’ But researchers – from AmFAR, the Foundation for AIDS Research, and the International AIDS Society (IAS) – argue in a preprint article that there have been “substantial disruptions across PEPFAR service areas”. Their analysis is based on both the newly released fourth quarter figures plus data from “an earlier inadvertent release [that] included all four quarters.” It covers 31,746 facilities and community service sites, which the researchers classify according to their reporting records as “continuous” (71.3%, who submitted reports every month), “intermittent” (16.9%, submitting some reports) and “community services” (2.5%). They report a “modest” 0,3% decline in people accessing HIV treatment, which is similar to the State Department assertion. But the researchers – Brian Honermann, Elise Lankiewicz, Jennifer Sherwood and Greg Millett from AmFAR and Anna Grimsrud from IAS – assert that this stable figure “obscures substantial changes”. The “continuous facilities” rebounded to slightly above their 2024 level as they maintained “at least some level of support from PEPFAR and are primarily owned and operated by ministries of health”. (Around three-quarters of PEPFAR-supported facilities in 2024 were government facilities.) They describe access to treatment as a “lagging indicator” of the overall health system performance because stable patients on treatment “already have strong routines in place for continually collecting medication.” Decline in testing, PrEP and health workers A Zimbabwean health worker administers an HIV test. The drop in HIV testing portends future weaknesses. There was an overall 17% decline in HIV testing – the gateway to ensuring people with HIV are on treatment – resulting in a 16% decrease in the number of people initiated on ARV treatment. Infant HIV testing declined by 6%, and infant diagnoses declined by 12% in the “continuous facilities”. There was a precipitous decline of 60% in testing and 31% in diagnosis in the “intermittent facilities”. “The significant declines in HIV testing, diagnoses, treatment initiations, and treatment retention programming, however, raise serious concerns for countries’ capacity to maintain progress toward the 95-95-95 targets – the United Nations target of 95% of people with HIV knowing their status; 95% on ARVs and 95% virally suppressed, adopted in 2021. PrEP initiations declined by 33% – largely as the Trump administration has designated PrEP for pregnant and breastfeeding women, rather than the “key populations” most at risk of HIV. The PEPFAR-supported workforce was reduced by 22% between 2024 and 2025, a loss of some 76,051 jobs. Instability, grant cancellation The researchers – Brian Honermann, Elise Lankiewicz, Jennifer Sherwood and Greg Millett from AmFAR and Anna Grimsrud from IAS – recount the damage to PEPFAR starting from Trump’s executive order on 20 January, freezing all foreign aid disbursements. This was followed by a stop work order on 24 January 24 for all foreign aid awards, including PEPFAR. “Following this period, a series of waivers allowed for the partial resumption of PEPFAR programming, including a PEPFAR-specific waiver that permitted a defined subset of HIV care, treatment, and prevention of mother-to-child transmission services to continue,” they note. But “the subsequent months were characterized by considerable instability, including cycles of award cancellations and reinstatements, legal challenges to the freeze, and the permanent dissolution of USAID, which was one of two major PEPFAR implementing agencies.” They point to other research that has modelled the calamitous impact of these disruptions on the fight against HIV. The last PEPFAR data? They also acknowledge that the full implications of the foreign aid review have been “difficult to assess” as the US government has released “no official list of terminated and active awards post-review”. However, they also note that “this is potentially the last data set PEPFAR will ever release”. “Under the terms of the memoranda of understanding (MOUs) that the US State Department is currently signing with partner governments, public disclosure of data from those data sets is prohibited, including with external researchers, academics, or advocacy organizations,” they note. “Without public data sets that enable national, sub-national, facility-level, and implementing mechanism level scrutiny, it is virtually impossible for external oversight and accountability to take place, whether within the US government or outside it.” Image Credits: UNAIDS, UNICEF Zimbabwe. Africa and Europe Announce €100 Million in Joint Initiatives to Strengthen Health Systems 21/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan German Ambassador to Ethiopia Birgitt Ory, Africa CDC Director General Dr Jean Kaseya, Jozef Síkela, European Commissioner for International Partnerships, and Ethiopian Health Minister Dr Mekdes Daba. The African Union and the European Commission have concluded three agreements worth €100 million aimed at strengthening Africa’s health systems. The first initiative supports the national public health institutes of 10 African countries to enhance disease surveillance, early warning systems, emergency response, research and laboratory services. The second, announced at the One Health Summit in Leon earlier this month, involves addressing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and developing a workforce trained in a ‘One Health’ approach to detect and prevent health threats in animals, humans and the environment. The third involves expanding digital health solutions for pandemic preparedness and stronger primary healthcare systems in six African countries. The initiatives were officially launched at the African Union headquarters on Tuesday by Jozef Síkela, European Commissioner for International Partnerships, and Dr Jean Kaseya, Director General of Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, which is the operational partner for the initiatives. “Health remains at the top of the EU’s political agenda, including in the shifting geopolitical landscape. While the others are stepping away, we are stepping up,” Sikela told the launch. “Recent history showed us that a health crisis in one region can turn very quickly into a global emergency, an economic crisis and a security threat. Investing in global health is a strategic investment, not a gesture.” Kaseya said that the support will assist the continent to achieve its Health Security and Sovereignty Agenda, “strengthening its capacity to build resilient health systems, improve preparedness, and reduce dependency by producing, financing and managing more of its own health priorities.” Sikela told the launch that the EU and AU are also working on a global health resilience initiative, with the aim of launching it in May. “This will be a powerful tool, bringing together research with medical technology and innovation programmes, knowledge transfer and systematic cooperation with regulatory agencies, health systems and highly skilled workforces,” he said. “The aim is to equip and empower health systems worldwide so that they are in a better position to prevent and respond to future crises,” he concluded, adding that this includes European investment in the local manufacturing of vaccines and medicines “to avoid health dependency.” Welcoming the initiatives, Ethiopian Health Minister Dr Mekdes Daba noted that “a crisis in one region can, with alarming speed, become a challenge for the continent and the world. From COVID-19 to mpox and the recent Marburg outbreak, we have learnt that preparedness cannot be deferred.” Regions with Worst Air Pollution Receive Least Amount of Philanthropic Support 21/04/2026 Sophia Samantaroy A new report on the status of philanthropy in air pollution from the Clean Air Fund found spending on preserving air quality heavily skewed in favor of North America, which enjoys cleaner air compared to Africa and Latin America. Less than 0.1% of all philanthropic funding has gone to the fight for clean air. Yet globally, nearly eight million deaths are attributed to the particles and gases that pollute the air – making air pollution the second biggest risk factor for premature death after high blood pressure. “Air pollution is one of the world’s largest public health threats,” said Dr Christa Hasenkopf, senior fellow at the Clean Air Fund (CAF). “And not only do we underfund it, we’re not directing the funds available to where they’re needed most. Africa has twice the population of North America and more than twice the air pollution, yet it receives 35 times less philanthropic air quality funding.” CAF’s report on philanthropic funding in air pollution reveals steep disparities in funding, where regions suffering from the worst polluted air receive the least amount of funding. Worldwide, 99% of people live in environments that exceed the World Health Organization’s (WHO) air quality guidelines. CAF found that between 2019 and 2023, philanthropic funding was heavily skewed towards North America, which received 35% of total outdoor air quality funding – yet thanks to over 50 years of clean air regulation, it broadly enjoys clean air. Meanwhile, Africa and Latin America received only 1% and 2% of funding, respectively. The lack of funding also has implications for air quality monitoring, crucial for protecting public health and guiding policies. Hasenkopf noted that “over a third of countries still don’t monitor their air quality at all. But this is a story about opportunity, not just neglect: even modest philanthropic investments in local capacity can unlock pollution reduction for nearly a billion people.” Philanthropies continue to play a critical role in environmental health, especially as unprecedented aid cuts rock the global aid economy. Africa, parts of Asia neglected Peak air pollution levels in the Indo-Gangetic plain, which includes Nepal, Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan. South Asian countries outside of India have a fraction of air quality funds compared to India. While North America has historically enjoyed the largest portion of philanthropic clean air investments at $165.6 million between 2019 and 2023, India and China have also received a significant share of funding- $77.9 million and $43.4 million respectively. CAF analyzed China and India separately from the rest of the Asia region because, in doing so, their report reveals a broader imbalance within Asia. Several Asian countries, notably Nepal, Bangladesh, and Pakistan, have faced some of the most dangerous air quality levels in the past decade. Pakistan and Bangladesh have ranked first and second for the highest levels of fine particulate matter in the world, according to the Swiss-based air quality organization, IQAir. Yet despite this burden, Asian countries -excluding India and China – received only 7% of outdoor air quality philanthropic funding. An IQAir map highlights the scarcity of monitoring data in poor air quality regions like the African continent. In Africa and Latin America, which are also high-need regions, funding remained “particularly low.” Four of the top 10 most air-polluted countries are in African: Chad, the DRC, Uganda, and Egypt. While Latin America has historically enjoyed cleaner air than its regional counterparts and innovative urban design in its cities, many areas still suffer from a lack of air pollution monitoring. The two regions received only 0.9% and 1.5% of total philanthropic outdoor air quality funding between 2019 and 2023, respectively. Philanthropic air quality funding by region between 2019 and 2023. However, the report notes a positive shift in funding to the Global South. The distribution of outdoor air quality funding grew from $5.1 million to $19.8 million in Asia – excluding China and India – and from $1.5 million to $2.2 million in Africa between 2022 and 2023. These figures are still dwarfed by the funding available in North America, although it is decreasing: from $56.2 million in 2022 to $25.1 million in 2023. “The fact that the funds are going to North America and others, is because communities have organized and demanded clean air,” said Dr Maria Neira, WHO’s former director of the environment, in a statement to Health Policy Watch. “We need to ensure that philanthropies are focusing the resources to create demand from the civil society in the countries most affected,” Neira said. Philanthropies step in to shore up funding A philanthropic success story: A map of the contiguous United States, depicting the efforts of the Sierra Club’s campaign to transition away from coal power plants. Retired plants shown in gray; yellow circles denote partially operating; red show fully operating. Historic aid cuts to global health, environment, and humanitarian assistance during 2025 sent shock waves through these sectors – and have jeopardized the lives of millions. The report acknowledges that philanthropies alone cannot fill the gaps left behind by the US and other governments, “they can ensure vital work can continue.” In the past year, Bloomberg Philanthropies has stepped in to cover the US’s funding for the UN Climate convention, while the Skoll and MacArthur Foundations pledged to increase giving after the dismantlement of USAID. Philanthropies are in a unique position to drive progress on clean air. These groups have the flexibility to take greater risks and fund early-stage innovations, pilots, and advocacy campaigns, the report notes – all without the debt burden typically associated with official government-given development assistance. Philanthropies also provide leadership in the political space through lending evidence, raising awareness of air pollution risks, and lobbying. “While philanthropies cannot fill the entire finance gap on their own, we’ve seen the hugely impactful domino effect they create,” said CAF CEO Jane Burston. “Their investments [accelerate] public policy and catalysing public and private finance.” Most of these projects fall under policy and awareness efforts, though the report highlights the need for technical projects like monitoring. Philanthropies have catalyzed change in the air pollution space for decades. In 2002, the Sierra Club launched its Beyond Coal Campaign, one of the most “extensive, effective, and long-lasting campaigns in the history of the environmental movement.” The campaign has advocated shifting away from coal to more renewable sources. Funding needed for other polluting sectors Young people trained by the Green African Youth Organization (GAYO) in Ghana, sort and divert waste from being burned. Philanthropic funding has primarily focused on the transportation sector, with 61% of funding supporting projects such as bus electrification or protecting pedestrian walkways away from busy roads. Other polluting sectors received a far smaller share of funding, notably the energy sector, agriculture, and the waste management sector. “Diversifying investments across sectors can help address several sources of emissions that significantly affect both health and climate outcomes,” the report argues. The waste management sector in particular could greatly benefit from addressing open air burning of solid waste and reducing methane and black carbon emissions. Burning waste generates toxic plumes of dioxins, furans, and heavy metals. More recent research has also pointed to the practice for releasing microplastics into the air. Several grassroots organizations, like the Green African Youth Organization (GAYO) in Ghana, Botswana, and Uganda, have projects that aim to reduce open-air burning and deploy air quality sensors to track open-burning hotspots. GAYO’s anti-incineration and no-burn campaign has trained more than 100 municipal officers and environmental health workers in community-level enforcement and education across Ghana. Their Zero Waste Cities initiative in Accra has recovered 50 to 75 tonnes of waste per month, diverting materials from both landfills and open burning. Engaging in these sectors beyond transportation – like in clean cooking and agricultural practices such as moving away from crop residue burning –“will be critical for improving public health, reducing inequality, and accelerating progress towards cleaner air and a more sustainable future,” the report argues. A call to increase philanthropic giving Waste workers join protest over air pollution exposure in Delhi. In the past several years, the rate of growth in philanthropic funding in clean air has slowed. While the raw numbers of funds invested have more than doubled between 2019 and 2023, reaching a total of $478 million, philanthropic funding for outdoor air quality is showing “signs of stagnation,” the report warns. Between 2022 and 2023, funding grew by only 2%, from $123.1 million to $125.8 million, the report says. Image Credits: Igor Karimov/ Unsplash, University of Chicago , IQAir, Clean Air Fund , Sierra Club, Clean Air Fund. Microplastics: Brain Study Confirms Health Risks, Challenges Kennedy’s Claims 20/04/2026 Felix Sassmannshausen & Sophia Samantaroy A new study reveals how microplastics are infiltrating human brain tissue. A joint announcement by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Health and Human Services (HHS) on microplastics made inaccurate claims about how many plastic particles exist in the brain, while providing an unclear regulatory plan to address this. But a study published in Nature Health found microplastics in nearly every one of its 191 human brain samples. US Health Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr hailed a federal proposal by the EPA to track microplastics contamination in drinking water earlier this month as “a turning point” in the effort to confront microplastics that have “become embedded in modern life.” Kennedy, the leading figure of the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement claimed that there is roughly a “spoonful of plastic in every human brain,” but a newly published study in the journal Nature Health challenges this alarming statistic – while also finding a proliferation of plastic in human brains. The mainly Chinese and US-affiliated researchers analysed 191 brain tissue samples collected across China, using advanced techniques, including laser direct infrared spectroscopy (LDIR) and pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS), to detect micro- and nanoplastics. They found that human brains actually average 50.3 micrograms per gram of healthy tissue, suggesting actual exposure levels are nearly 100 times – or two orders of magnitude – lower than a contested older study cited by Kennedy. Despite this significantly lower concentration, the new findings notably confirm the presence of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) in 100% of the healthy post-mortem brains analysed and in 99.4% of diseased brains. “This study provides evidence of MNP presence in the living human brain, highlighting a need for further research to understand causal links between MNPs and human disease,” Runting Li and colleagues wrote in the publication released on Monday. The toxic legacy of plastic additives This diagram from the Nature Health study maps the presence of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) in the diseased human brain, detailing median concentrations The threat of micro- and nanoplastics contamination in the brain tissue raises significant concern as they can penetrate the blood-brain barrier, where they are subsequently engulfed by the brain’s immune cells, known as microglia. Because these synthetic particles cannot be biologically degraded, they accumulate within the tissue and can trigger severe oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and chronic neuroinflammation. Furthermore, clinical data from patients with brain cancer reveal a concerning correlation regarding tumour progression. The Nature Health researchers found that a larger microplastic surface area within the tissue was positively associated with faster tumour growth and proliferation. The danger extends beyond the physical particles to the thousands of chemical additives used during manufacturing, such as bisphenols and phthalates, which are known endocrine disruptors linked to a host of chronic diseases. Additionally, the degrading particles act as highly effective carriers for other environmental pollutants, absorbing heavy metals, pesticides, and even viruses to carry these dangerous hitchhikers directly into the human bloodstream. This combined chemical and physical burden drives severe health outcomes. Clinical studies indicate that patients with detectable microplastic contamination in their arterial plaque face a 4.5-fold higher risk of suffering a heart attack, stroke, or death within three years. Validating urgent research needs Experts analysing the new study voiced concerns over potential false positives and laboratory contamination. However, the new study, which was evaluated by independent experts, also faces criticism. Scientists raised concerns about methodological flaws, warning that the imaging techniques likely produced false positives by mistaking human proteins for polyamide and human fats for polyethylene, the world’s most common plastic. In a statement to press evaluating the research, Dr Dieter Fischer, head of the microplastics working group at the Leibniz Institute of Polymer Research in Dresden, Germany, argued it is highly unlikely that the identified particles actually originated from the human tissue samples. He suggested the results are likely to be skewed by laboratory contamination and the fundamental difficulty of distinguishing plastics from natural human hydrocarbons. Conversely, other experts not involved in the study praised the researchers for utilising multiple analytical methods, noting that this dual approach makes the findings significantly more robust than previous research. Dr Martin Wagner, head of the bioanalytical toxicology lab at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, concluded that these new metrics regarding the presence and quantity of microplastics in the brain are much more dependable than prior estimates. Furthermore, neuro-oncology experts stress that the higher plastic concentrations found near brain tumours are merely an association, as aggressive tumours actively destroy the blood-brain barrier to allow external particles to passively accumulate. The Nature Health authors acknowledge this unproven causal relationship, warning that their findings should be interpreted with caution to avoid unnecessary public alarm. Standardising microplastics contamination research Despite efforts to define nanoplastics, there is still no standardised protocol for detection. This warning underscores the necessity of further research and standardisation, as the absence of unified detection and reporting protocols makes it very difficult to compare data across studies and reliably estimate human exposure levels. While studies generally describe microplastics as fragments ranging from one micrometre to five millimetres and nanoplastics as an even smaller subfraction measuring under one micrometre, these smallest particles are frequently neglected in research due to current methodological limitations. “The laboratory methods to study micro- and nanoparticles and their health effects are still evolving,” Dr Rebecca Florsheim, a research physician at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine, noted in a statement to the American Lung Association last month. Recognising that current scientific methods remain limited, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) launched a $144 million initiative called the Systematic Targeting of Microplastics (STOMP)nearlier this month. Led by the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), the programme aims to build gold-standard clinical tests to accurately measure, map and ultimately remove microplastics contamination from the human body. Overlooking exposure routes Experts warn that focusing solely on water may overlook other critical pathways for microplastic exposure, including through inhalation and eating processed foods. While public health experts expressed support for the EPA’s proposal to add microplastics and pharmaceuticals to the draft Sixth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 6) for public drinking water, they warn that the focus on water and attempts to “eliminate microplastics from the human body” are too narrow. The CCL6/CCL does not actually regulate America’s public drinking water but signals that a contaminant “warrants serious scientific attention and may be considered for future regulatory action,” the agency noted. Other experts worry that this focus could lead to different critical exposure routes being overlooked. Environmental groups have urged agencies to prioritise the reduction of synthetic textiles, as these fabrics continuously shed microfibers that contaminate indoor air and are inhaled, and also easily bypass wastewater filtration systems. In addition, research by Dr Samantha Romanick, a scientist at the nonprofit Environmental Working Group (EWG), shows that ultra-processed foods typically contain higher plastic levels than less processed alternatives. This contamination largely occurs during industrial manufacturing, as ingredients undergo multiple processing stages and are continually exposed to shedding plastic from conveyor belts, tubes, and packaging. Furthermore, researchers behind the recent brain study discovered that routine surgical equipment, including plastic syringes and intravenous infusion sets, actively sheds microplastics directly into vulnerable patients. They calculated that a single surgical operation could introduce over 30,000 microplastics directly into the bloodstream, bypassing the gut and lungs entirely. “With the widespread use of plastic-based medical devices, MNP contamination in clinical environments is probably unavoidable,” Runting Li and colleagues warned in their Nature Health paper. They stressed that this direct exposure pathway demands global attention and the urgent establishment of stringent quality-control standards within the healthcare industry. The world’s burden of plastic ingestion Global human consumption of microplastics has now grown to six times the rate in 1990. The scale of global exposure extends far beyond the borders of the United States, as human consumption of microplastics has grown to six times the rate recorded in 1990. This burden falls disproportionately on Southeast Asia, which experiences some of the world’s highest microplastic ingestion rates due to severe contamination within its seafood-rich diets. Advocates claim that addressing this crisis requires shifting the focus away from individual consumer choices or speculative human treatment, and toward stringent corporate accountability and the absolute reduction of plastic use and water regulation. To this end, the global community is looking toward the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on Plastic Pollution, which aims to develop a legally binding international treaty. However, progress on the treaty remains slow as major plastic-producing nations, including the US, strongly oppose limits on plastic production. “While we did not land the treaty text we hoped for, we at UNEP will continue the work against plastic pollution,” said Inger Andersen, executive director of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) at the close of last year’s negotiations. “Pollution that is in our groundwater, in our soil, in our rivers, in our oceans and yes, in our bodies.” Image Credits: European Union, Nature Health, Felix Sassmannshausen/HPW, Andreas Mattern/UFZ via EU Commission, Taichi Nakamura via Unsplash. Bangladesh Tightens Control Over Tobacco But Excludes Smokeless Products 20/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan Around a quarter of Bangladeshi men smoke, which has major health impacts. Bangladesh’s new government has approved a wide-ranging anti-tobacco law that bans advertising, promotion and display across print, electronic, digital and social media, entertainment platforms and points of sale. The Smoking and Tobacco Usage (Control) (Amendment) Law, 2025 also prohibits corporate social responsibility initiatives from using tobacco brand names, logos or trademarks. Cigarette packs have to carry pictorial health warnings covering at least 75% of their surface and include the contact numbers of the national quit line. It also expands smoke-free public places and bans the sale and use of tobacco products within 100 meters of schools, hospitals, clinics and playgrounds. This is one of the first laws passed by the government of Prime Minister Tarique Rahman, who was sworn in last month after winning elections in February. Rahman’s Bangladesh National Party took over from an interim administration installed after an uprising in 2024 removed Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and her Awami League from power. the country has a high prevalence of tobacco use, with an estimated 25% of men in Bangladesh smoking – over 21 million. In 2023, around a quarter of deaths among men and 10% of women’s deaths were caused by tobacco – almost 200,000 people in total, according to the Tobacco Atlas. In addition to the substantial health burden, the annual cost of illness attributable to smoking in Bangladesh is estimated to be 730.63 billion takas (approximately US$5.9 billion). Vapes excluded The law does not cover newer tobacco and nicotine products, including vapes, heated tobacco products, electronic nicotine delivery systems and nicotine pouches. This is despite almost 25% of people using smokeless tobacco products, according to the Tobacco Atlas. Welcoming the law, Gan Quan, Vital Strategies’ senior vice president for tobacco control, urged its quick implementation. “This is a positive step, setting the stage to save millions of lives and deliver economic gains, so we must seize this moment with continued collaboration among government agencies, civil society and public health partners, and continuing public education about the harms caused by tobacco,” he said. “Together, we must remain vigilant against the industry’s attempts to subvert or delay these measures and further strengthen policy to address the regulation of emerging tobacco and nicotine products. There is an urgent need to protect youth in particular from being targeted with these products.” Smita Baruah, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids executive vice-president, said that the new measures “will drive down rates of tobacco use, save lives and protect kids from addiction to tobacco.” “Tobacco companies know that strong tobacco control laws work to stop people from smoking and prevent young people from starting to smoke, so they do everything in their power to undermine lifesaving laws like this. It is crucial that these measures be protected from the interests of the world’s largest tobacco companies,” she added. Image Credits: Simon Reza/ Unsplash. Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Include Access to Safe Abortion Services 20/04/2026 Maggie De Block Although the World Health Organization (WHO) recognises comprehensive abortion care as an essential health service, countries all over the world are tightening access, inspired by the United States. But all this means is worse outcomes for women’s health There is a persistent myth that restricting abortion stops it from happening. What restrictions really do – predictably and tragically – is make abortion unsafe. The WHO reports that around 73 million abortions occur worldwide each year, of which – remarkably – 45% are unsafe. The 2017 WHO–Guttmacher report found that 97% of unsafe abortions occurred in developing countries, particularly in Africa, Asia and Latin America, and WHO’s 2022 abortion care guideline notes that around seven million women in developing countries are treated for complications of unsafe abortion every year. Those are only the women who make it to care. Many do not. A preventable cause of maternal mortality The mortality gap between safe and unsafe abortion is stark. In settings where abortion is safe and legal, deaths are rare; where it is unsafe, the risks rise dramatically because the procedure is carried out by unskilled people or in environments that do not meet minimum medical standards, or both. Maternal deaths due to unsafe abortion are often misclassified and under-reported. A review encompassing the period 2009–20 found that 8% of maternal deaths globally were linked to abortion. In low- and middle-income countries, the impact of unsafe abortion is compounded by weak primary care systems, provider shortages, long travel distances, punitive laws, and stigma. The result is delay, secrecy, shame, and complications that could have been prevented. Put simply: when states fail to provide access to safe care, women do not stop seeking abortions. Rather, they are placed in unnecessary danger, with serious health, social and economic consequences. Safe abortion is a basic human right Access to safe abortion is grounded in international human rights law, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. In Africa, the Maputo Protocol provides an especially important regional anchor for women’s reproductive rights. Many human rights bodies and mechanisms agree that lack of access to quality abortion care risks violating the rights of women and girls, including the right to life; the right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health; the right to benefit from scientific progress and its realisation; the right to decide freely and responsibly on the number, spacing and timing of children; rights to privacy and to freedom from discrimination, and the right to be free from torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment. Human rights bodies have also noted that restrictions on access to abortion affect some women disproportionately. The UN Working Group on Discrimination Against Women in Law and in Practice has observed that “in countries where induced termination of pregnancy is restricted by law and/or otherwise unavailable, safe termination of pregnancy is a privilege of the rich, while women with limited resources have little choice but to resort to unsafe providers.” The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women has expressed particular concern that “rural women are more likely to resort to unsafe abortion than their urban counterparts”. The same is true for adolescents, who frequently lack information. The Committee on the Rights of the Child has urged States “to decriminalise abortion to ensure that girls have access to safe abortion and postabortion services, review legislation with a view to guaranteeing the best interests of pregnant adolescents and ensure that their views are always heard and respected in abortion-related decisions.” Comprehensive abortion care is more than medicines The practical case for ensuring access to abortion services is also strong because the tools already exist. WHO’s 2023 clinical guidance and self-care recommendations recognise medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol as a safe and effective option, and these medicines are included on the WHO Essential Medicines List. The WHO guideline also states that medical abortion can be self-managed using mifepristone plus misoprostol or misoprostol alone where people have accurate information and access to a trained health worker if needed. In resource-constrained settings, that matters enormously. Medication abortion can reduce dependence on scarce specialist infrastructure, make earlier care more feasible, and expand access to rural and other underserved women. But medicines alone are not enough. Women also need quality-assured products, clear information, referral pathways, pain management, and emergency backup if needed. A tablet without a system to support its use is not access. Comprehensive abortion care also includes contraception, counselling and information, timely diagnosis, medical or surgical abortion where appropriate, and post-abortion care for complications after miscarriage or unsafe abortion. Post-abortion care is not an optional extra. Abortion access is shaped by many other policies and practices: access to contraception, laws on marital consent, approaches to gender-based violence, access to adoption services, affordability, provider bias, supply chains, transport, privacy and digital information, religious views, and whether women trust the health system enough to use it. If someone must travel for hours, pay out of pocket, or be shamed and harassed for seeking care, she does not have real access. What governments and donors must do: Reform laws and regulations that criminalise or unduly restrict abortion care. Criminalisation of abortion must end. Punitive laws on women and service providers drive delay, secrecy and unsafe methods. Make mifepristone and misoprostol reliably available and affordable. Registration, procurement, quality assurance and distribution are essential policy choices. Integrate abortion into primary health care and universal health coverage packages. Abortion should not be separate from routine sexual, reproductive and maternal health services. Expand provider training and task-sharing. WHO guidance supports community service models, which are crucial in workforce-constrained settings. Guarantee access to post-abortion care. Even in restrictive settings, treating complications is an absolute minimum standard. Invest in information, privacy and building trust. Women need accurate information and safe pathways into care, with compassion, and without stigma. The choice is political The impact of unsafe abortion on maternal mortality is indisputable. The medicines and standards of care for safe abortion are well established. The rights framework is clear. What remains is a political choice – whether governments, donors and multilateral institutions will treat safe abortion as basic health care or continue to support a hierarchy in which women suffer indignity and die of preventable causes while others pass judgement. Above all, let’s start from this simple premise: women and girls are not vessels for state or religious ideology. They are rights-holders. If governments are serious about realising the right to health and reducing maternal mortality, then safe abortion access must be part of the plan – explicitly, urgently, and at scale. Maggie De Block served as Belgium’s Minister of Social Affairs and Health from 2014 to 2020. She is a medical doctor and a member of the Belgian Chamber of Representatives. Image Credits: Center for Reproductive Rights. ‘A Unique Moment’: New Regional Air Pollution Plans Aim to Cut Health Burden Across Latin America 17/04/2026 Sophia Samantaroy Medellin, Colombia’s second largest city, is located in the northern Andes, where smog becomes trapped through meteorological temperature inversions. The Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO) will soon unveil a new Roadmap on Air Quality and Health, following on from a meeting with countries and other stakeholders in February in Mexico. The PAHO strategy dovetails with an ambitious new regional action plan by the UN Environment Programme – which supports the work of environment ministries. While the high mountains of the Andes might be associated in popular imagination with crystal clear air, in fact, these 4000+ meter high mountains also trap air pollution, smothering cities nestled in their towering ranges. It is visual testimony to the health impacts of an air pollution problem that kills some 370,000 people annually across Latin America and the Caribbean. But Latin American and Caribbean countries are at a “unique moment” in terms of opportunities to improve air quality, marking a critical pivot toward treating air pollution not merely as an environmental byproduct, but as a top-tier public health emergency, according to Juan J Castillo who leads the air quality team at PAHO, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) regional office for the Americas. “We see this action plan as an opportunity to send a strong message to the region, to the ministers of health and the environment, that there is a clear case for health in improving air quality,” said Juan Castillo. His team has been leading the plan’s development while also working to bolster collaboration across Latin America, connecting ministries of the environment and health, and closing the air pollution monitoring gap. Meeting the WHO goal to halve deaths from air pollution by 2040 Latin American cities are already taking climate adaptation measures, like Barranquilla, shown here. But air pollution experts highlight the health benefits of green urban desgin. The action plan comes a year after the World Health Organization’s second conference on Air pollution and health, hosted in Cartagena, Colombia. A core aim of the plan is to create a pathway for meeting the WHO target set out at the Cartagena meeting of halving deaths from air pollution by 2040. At the conference, some 20 countries, including many from the Latin American region, made related pledges. But the action plan aims to mainstream the goal into the plans of health ministries. Over 700 stakeholders gathered in Cartagena, Colombia, for the 2nd WHO Air Pollution and Health in 2025. “This is truly a pivotal point,” Castillo said. “Latin America requires solutions that respond to the specific needs of the region. This is why it is charting its own path towards cleaner air- and one that could inspire other lower- and middle-income nations, fostering further South-South cooperation.” Latin America and the Caribbean already have cleaner air, on average, than hot spots like South East Asia, there is still a long way to go to achieve the World Health Organization quality goals. Some cities in the region actually meet WHO air quality guidelines for particulate matter (PM2.5) and others exceed them “only” by one to two times. However, a number of cities in Chile, Brazil, Bolivia and Peru, have average annual PM2.5 concentrations reaching 3-5 times above WHO guidelines, according to the 2025 report of the Swiss-based monitoring firm, IQ-Air. Lima, Peru is one noteworthy example. The health argument for cleaner skies Local authorities in Lima, Peru promote cycling as part of a sustainable mobility effort. “The evidence shows that there is a huge burden of disease linked to air pollution in the region,” said Castillo. “Air pollution is one of the leading causes of non-communicable diseases and also for all kinds of morbidity, such as asthma attacks, respiratory infections and impaired cognitive development. So we’re focused on using the evidence to help countries make the best decision to achieve their public health goals.” Many countries in Latin America have implemented steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but these climate policies often neglect to consider the health benefits of tackling climate pollutants. These health impact assessments of climate mitigation are crucial and are included in the Organization’s Air Quality and Health Plan for Latin America and the Caribbean, said Castillo. “We need to understand the health gains to bolster the argument for environmental policies and to help with the strategic importance of these policies.” Integrating air quality action on climate change “can be particularly beneficial, as it broadens access to funding and delivers greater public health benefits,” notes a December 2025 regional action strategy by the UNEP-hosted Climate and Clean Air Coalition. Action needed beyond the health sector An all-electric bus in Brasilia is one of many rolled out across Latin America. The CCAC strategy is targeted to ministries of the environment, while the PAHO roadmap focuses on ministries of health. But the two aim to work in tandem to build political will for systemic changes that reduce air pollution. Such changes typically require action on finance, transport, building and household energy systems, urban design and waste management – well beyond the traditional domain of health ministries. In terms of transport, a major air pollution factor, Latin America historically has had stronger public transport systems than many other developing regions, and cities such as Curitiba and Bogota became pioneers in developing Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) as well as cycle networks, which helped reduce emissions from private automobiles. Baranquilla has pioneered several clean transport initiatives, such as electric buses, as shown in a Transformative Urban Mobility Initiative brochure. But too often, BRT systems in the region have remained too dependent on dirty diesel – where cleaner electric systems are needed to really clean up the air further. Now, there is a move to electrify BRT systems in key Latin American cities such as Brasilia, Brazil and Barranquilla, Colombia, supported partly by German development assistance as well as local initiatives. Barranquilla, Colombia, has undergone a massive urban renewal effort with the aim of shifting to a 50% electric bus fleet by 2034. Public transport is being integrated with cycle networks and pedestrian-friendly streets – about 30% of travel is on foot – supporting healthier, more active, and low-emissions mobility. PAHO hopes that more cities can see the health benefits of urban design – and use climate funding for greener cities that foster public health. Closing the monitoring and data gap The new PAHO roadmap advocates for better air quality monitoring to better inform policymakers. Tracking air quality progress has been a challenge for the region. Less than 40% of countries have a government standard for chronic exposure to the most dangerous form of particulate pollution, PM2.5. Without these standards, governments cannot chart further regulation to clean up polluted skies. The region has also struggled with tracking air quality. Only a third of cities in the region have active reference monitoring stations- or local inventories of criteria pollutant emissions, active air management programs, or government-published health impact assessments, according to the most recent regional action plan. And only seven cities have air quality forecasting systems. The data that is available raises several concerns. Of the 58 cities with PM2.5 data, only one city complies with the WHO guideline values. The region of Latin America and the Caribbean has, on average, enjoys cleaner air than South Asia or the African continent. Much of the poorer air quality is in urban centers and the Andean region. “Many cities lack key tools, or those that exist are not operational, up to date, or in use, while their populations remain exposed to harmful pollution levels,” says CCAC in its 2025 regional strategy. A consortium of South American researchers echoed that, in a 2025 review that stated: “South America would greatly benefit from expanded monitoring networks, improved air quality modeling, and detailed health data to better understand exposure–health relationships and multipollutant interactions.” Grassroots organizers like Ana Badillo, a co-founder of the Ecuador-based advocacy group Pacha Ayllu, have also championed access to real-time air quality data through the expanded use by “citizen-scientists” of low-cost air pollution sensors in the capital city of Quito. “This citizen-led monitoring network is designed to empower individuals and communities to better understand the quality of the air they breathe and make informed decisions to protect their health and that of their loved ones,” said Badillo in a recent post. The democratization of data is also central to the new CCAC strategy, which is promoting its AQMx Platform, a digital hub designed to support air quality management exchange and integrate conventional air quality monitoring with low-cost sensor networks, relying more on civil society groups like Pacha Ayllu. Collaborating across sectors At COP30 in Belém in 2025, Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus signaled a historic shift by formalizing the Belém Health Action Plan, highlighting the urgency of climate action for health. With funding an “obvious” challenge for cleaning up Latin America’s air, PAHO and its partners have emphasized the health gains of environmental interventions to help governments understand the strategic importance of such changes. In relation to that, collaboration across the energy and environmental sectors is key, says Castillo, whose office is also working closely with the UNEP-hosted CCAC. Tapping into energy sector investments also means cleaner, more affordable, and reliable energy. The new CCAC strategy targets not only air pollution, but a “triple planetary crisis” – climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution – by focusing on the reduction of “super pollutants” like black carbon and methane a precursor of ground level ozone (O3), as well as a powerful climate pollutant. But black carbon and methane do not remain long in the atmosphere, reductions can yield rapid gains for health as well as climate. By making air quality projects “bankable” for multilateral giants like the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), the plan seeks to move beyond sporadic grants toward a flexible financing architecture that includes green bonds and blended finance. Mexico City: a story of success A combination of Mexico City’s high population, geography, and occasional wildfires have made clean air a challenge for decades. Castillo pointed to the example of Mexico City, which once had some of the most polluted air in the Americas, or even the world, as a story of success. It was grassroots organizations that agitated for clean air protections. “They demanded action,” Castillo said. “And many other places are following suit.” Mexico City has developed a robust air quality monitoring system, NowCast – and one of the most ambitious goals for reducing short-lived climate pollutants in the region. “It has helped enormously in terms of health protection, because we can now warn people much sooner, telling them not to go outside, not to exercise outdoors and to avoid inhaling highly polluted air,” said Sergio Zirath, Mexico’s director general of Industry, Clean Energy and Air Quality Management in an interview with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Mexico has now stepped in to provide technical advice to other countries across the region on clean air solutions. Although this is an effort being led by PAHO, an organization that also includes Canada and the United States, by definition as a strategy for Latin America and the Caribbean, neither are part of this new strategy. “PAHO respects every country’s decision on how they want to manage their policy. Our focus is based on evidence, action and available data,” said Castillo, when asked about the absence of the US from regional clean air activities since the Trump administration took over in January 2025. But in the end, Castillo hopes this strategic plan – an undertaking that still includes 21 countries, civil society, and PAHO – will be more than “just another document.” Instead, he hopes it will provide countries with an opportunity to capitalize on changes already happening in the region – ones that might even clean up the air in the region’s worst-polluted cities suffering from smog buffered by the high Andes. Image Credits: Municipality of Bethlehem, S. Samantaroy/HPW, Partnerships for Health Cities, TUMI, IQAir, IQAir, WHO/PAHO/Karina Zambrana . From Vaccines to Racism: RFK Faces Barrage of Questions in House Committee 16/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan Representative Linda Sanchez (left) questioning Kennedy about the explosion of measles cases under his watch. Undermining vaccines, failing pregnant black women, threatening to remove black children with ADHD from their parents – these were some of the barrage of questions put to United States Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr when he appeared before the House Ways and Means Committee on Thursday. Kennedy was testifying about the Trump administration’s 2027 budget, which proposes to cut the HHS budget by 12,5% – including deep cuts for HIV programmes ($923 million less), maternal and child health ($561m), and mental health ($576m). The Trump 2027 budget also proposes to eliminate $4.3 billion from the US government’s global health budget, which falls under the US State Department. Massive measles increase There has been a 675% increase in measles cases since Kennedy was appointed in February last year, according to US Representative Linda Sanchez. “In 2024, under the Biden administration, there were 258 cases of measles. And in 2025, under your leadership at HHS, this ballooned to over 2,000 [cases]. That’s a 675% increase, and we are now on track to suppress to surpass that this year, with over 1,600 confirmed cases in just three and a half months,” said Sanchez. Pointing to the death last year of a six-year-old unvaccinated girl from measles, the first death of a US child from measles in a decade, Sanchez asked Kennedy whether a measles vaccine could have saved her life. “It’s possible,” Kennedy answered. Robert F Kennedy Jr testifying before the House Ways and Means Committee. Sanchez tore into Kennedy for orchestrating the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) decision to remove its “universal vaccine recommendations for children covering seven immunizations, including things like flu, covid, hepatitis A, hepatitis B and rotavirus.” She also quoted Kennedy’s claim on Fox News last year that the adverse effects from the measles vaccine “cause deaths every year… and causes all the illnesses that measles itself causes.” Sanchez said that “CDC data shows that about 80% of children who died from flu this season were not vaccinated, [and] the anti-vaccine rhetoric you ran on and the anti-vaccine actions you have taken over the last year clearly correlates with the dramatic increases in preventable diseases.” She asked Kennedy repeatedly whether Trump agreed with the CDC decision to “suspend public health messaging on vaccines last February” – but Kennedy dodged the question, claiming Sanchez has “a lot of misinformation”. Representative Mike Thompson said that Kennedy is “helping make diseases deadly again.” “Kids have died because measles is running rampant under your watch, in large part because President Trump allowed your conspiracy theories to run our public health,” said Thompson. Undermining health of black women “Black women are nearly three times more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than white women, yet the Trump administration is undermining black maternal health from all sides,” said Representative Danny Davis, a leader of the Congressional Black Caucus. He cited the Trump administration’s decision to cut $1 trillion from Medicaid, “which pays for 40% of births”, the proposed cuts to maternal and child care for 2027, and cuts to research. “DOGE [Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency] cancelled funds for several research projects that could save countless black mothers, like the Morehouse School of Medicine research on improving the health of black pregnant and postpartum women,” said Davis. “How can we lower black maternal health experiences if we’re cutting funds for these critical programmes, and the administration is saying that you can’t consider race or ethnicity in healthcare?” In response, Kennedy claimed that there had been “tremendous duplication” in programmes and “we are investing huge amounts of money in maternal health.” The US has the highest maternal mortality rate in the developed world. ‘Reparenting’ black children? Representative Terri Sewell (centre) raised Kennedy’s comments that black children on ADHD medication should be “reparented” Describing various comments made by Kennedy as “outlandish and frankly disturbing”, Representative Terri Sewell took issue with his stating during a podcast interview that black children on ADHD medication should be “reparented”. “You said every black kid is now just standardly put on Adderall, SSRIs, benzos, which are known to induce violence, and that those children are going to have to go somewhere to get reparented,” said Sewell, reminding Kennedy that there was a long history of black children being removed from their parents, dating back to slavery. Despite Kennedy’s comments being recorded, he denied making them and said he “doesn’t even know what reparenting means”. Budget chief under pressure Meanwhile, health activists interrupted the testimony of Russell Vought, head of the US Office of Management and Budget (OMB), before the House Budget Committee on Wednesday. Minutes after Vought began his opening statement on the 2027 budget proposal, protesters tood up, holding up posters and shouting slogans accusing the Trump administration of killing people with HIV, and urging the administration to spend the funds Congress has allocated to the US President’s Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (PEPFAR). ”Russell Vought is directly responsible for illegally withholding Congressionally appropriated funds for PEPFAR and related global health initiatives. These funding disruptions have already contributed to preventable deaths and threaten to reverse decades of progress in the fight against HIV worldwide,” said Charles King, CEO of Housing Works, in a statement from the protestors issued by Health Gap. They accuse Vought of “blatant defiance of the will of Congress, which has fully funded PEPFAR programs for FY25 and FY26 over Vought’s objections, including by rejecting $400 million in rescission of PEPFAR funding in 2025.” “The FY27 President’s budget request for HIV and global health would eliminate HIV-specific and all disease-specific programming, while slashing overall global health funding by 46% compared with FY26 levels ($9.4 billion in FY26; $5.4 billion proposed in FY27 the President’s budget request),” according to the statement. “In addition to proposing deadly funding cuts, the FY27 budget request also disparages scientific evidence in global health, particularly regarding highly effective methods of HIV prevention, suggesting elimination of funding for condoms and programs for LGBTQ+ people, who face disproportionately high HIV risk of HIV infection due to criminalization and stigma,” according to the statement. Vought also recently diverted $15 million in USAID funding aimed at lifesaving humanitarian assistance to pay for his personal security, according to Reuters. Vought, former vice-president of the right-wing think tank Heritage Foundation, co-authored Project 2025, the conservative blueprint for governance being followed by the Trump administration. Posts navigation Older posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Researchers Dispute US Government’s Upbeat Data About PEPFAR’s Impact on HIV 22/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan PEPFAR funded 80% of the running costs of Luyengo Clinic in Eswatini, and the HIV treatment of 3,000 clients was distrupted when the US froze foreign aid. Researchers have challenged several upbeat claims made by the United States government about the continued impact of the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). The US State Department claims that PEPFAR has sustained its impact on HIV despite the service disruptions and funding cuts introduced by the Trump administration. In a data release covering 1 July through 31 September (the fourth quarter of the US budget cycle), the US government reports that PEPFAR supported 20,6 million people in over 50 countries on anti-retroviral (ARV) treatment. They note that this is “stable from the same FY 2024 reporting period”. “Three million people now receive treatment from national governments rather than external PEPFAR implementers,” with two million “successfully transitioned” during the fourth quarter alone, according to a statement from the US State Department’s Bureau of Global Health Security and Diplomacy (GHSD). PEPFAR initiated 103,000 pregnant and breastfeeding women on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), “more than double the 43,000 from a year ago”, according to the GHSD. PrEP involves HIV negative people taking ARVs to prevent infection. While the GHSD acknowledges a decline in the number of children on HIV treatment – from 643,627 in 2022 to 508,703 in 2025 – it attributes this to “tremendous progress” in prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT). Historically, however, HIV positive children are hard to reach, and only slightly over half of children under the age of 15 who are living with HIV are actually on ARVs, according to UNICEF. “The message is clear: we cut overall spending by 30% while preserving critical frontline HIV care and eliminating wasteful programs. This proves the America First Global Health Strategy works,” according to the GHSD. ‘Substantial disruptions’ But researchers – from AmFAR, the Foundation for AIDS Research, and the International AIDS Society (IAS) – argue in a preprint article that there have been “substantial disruptions across PEPFAR service areas”. Their analysis is based on both the newly released fourth quarter figures plus data from “an earlier inadvertent release [that] included all four quarters.” It covers 31,746 facilities and community service sites, which the researchers classify according to their reporting records as “continuous” (71.3%, who submitted reports every month), “intermittent” (16.9%, submitting some reports) and “community services” (2.5%). They report a “modest” 0,3% decline in people accessing HIV treatment, which is similar to the State Department assertion. But the researchers – Brian Honermann, Elise Lankiewicz, Jennifer Sherwood and Greg Millett from AmFAR and Anna Grimsrud from IAS – assert that this stable figure “obscures substantial changes”. The “continuous facilities” rebounded to slightly above their 2024 level as they maintained “at least some level of support from PEPFAR and are primarily owned and operated by ministries of health”. (Around three-quarters of PEPFAR-supported facilities in 2024 were government facilities.) They describe access to treatment as a “lagging indicator” of the overall health system performance because stable patients on treatment “already have strong routines in place for continually collecting medication.” Decline in testing, PrEP and health workers A Zimbabwean health worker administers an HIV test. The drop in HIV testing portends future weaknesses. There was an overall 17% decline in HIV testing – the gateway to ensuring people with HIV are on treatment – resulting in a 16% decrease in the number of people initiated on ARV treatment. Infant HIV testing declined by 6%, and infant diagnoses declined by 12% in the “continuous facilities”. There was a precipitous decline of 60% in testing and 31% in diagnosis in the “intermittent facilities”. “The significant declines in HIV testing, diagnoses, treatment initiations, and treatment retention programming, however, raise serious concerns for countries’ capacity to maintain progress toward the 95-95-95 targets – the United Nations target of 95% of people with HIV knowing their status; 95% on ARVs and 95% virally suppressed, adopted in 2021. PrEP initiations declined by 33% – largely as the Trump administration has designated PrEP for pregnant and breastfeeding women, rather than the “key populations” most at risk of HIV. The PEPFAR-supported workforce was reduced by 22% between 2024 and 2025, a loss of some 76,051 jobs. Instability, grant cancellation The researchers – Brian Honermann, Elise Lankiewicz, Jennifer Sherwood and Greg Millett from AmFAR and Anna Grimsrud from IAS – recount the damage to PEPFAR starting from Trump’s executive order on 20 January, freezing all foreign aid disbursements. This was followed by a stop work order on 24 January 24 for all foreign aid awards, including PEPFAR. “Following this period, a series of waivers allowed for the partial resumption of PEPFAR programming, including a PEPFAR-specific waiver that permitted a defined subset of HIV care, treatment, and prevention of mother-to-child transmission services to continue,” they note. But “the subsequent months were characterized by considerable instability, including cycles of award cancellations and reinstatements, legal challenges to the freeze, and the permanent dissolution of USAID, which was one of two major PEPFAR implementing agencies.” They point to other research that has modelled the calamitous impact of these disruptions on the fight against HIV. The last PEPFAR data? They also acknowledge that the full implications of the foreign aid review have been “difficult to assess” as the US government has released “no official list of terminated and active awards post-review”. However, they also note that “this is potentially the last data set PEPFAR will ever release”. “Under the terms of the memoranda of understanding (MOUs) that the US State Department is currently signing with partner governments, public disclosure of data from those data sets is prohibited, including with external researchers, academics, or advocacy organizations,” they note. “Without public data sets that enable national, sub-national, facility-level, and implementing mechanism level scrutiny, it is virtually impossible for external oversight and accountability to take place, whether within the US government or outside it.” Image Credits: UNAIDS, UNICEF Zimbabwe. Africa and Europe Announce €100 Million in Joint Initiatives to Strengthen Health Systems 21/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan German Ambassador to Ethiopia Birgitt Ory, Africa CDC Director General Dr Jean Kaseya, Jozef Síkela, European Commissioner for International Partnerships, and Ethiopian Health Minister Dr Mekdes Daba. The African Union and the European Commission have concluded three agreements worth €100 million aimed at strengthening Africa’s health systems. The first initiative supports the national public health institutes of 10 African countries to enhance disease surveillance, early warning systems, emergency response, research and laboratory services. The second, announced at the One Health Summit in Leon earlier this month, involves addressing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and developing a workforce trained in a ‘One Health’ approach to detect and prevent health threats in animals, humans and the environment. The third involves expanding digital health solutions for pandemic preparedness and stronger primary healthcare systems in six African countries. The initiatives were officially launched at the African Union headquarters on Tuesday by Jozef Síkela, European Commissioner for International Partnerships, and Dr Jean Kaseya, Director General of Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, which is the operational partner for the initiatives. “Health remains at the top of the EU’s political agenda, including in the shifting geopolitical landscape. While the others are stepping away, we are stepping up,” Sikela told the launch. “Recent history showed us that a health crisis in one region can turn very quickly into a global emergency, an economic crisis and a security threat. Investing in global health is a strategic investment, not a gesture.” Kaseya said that the support will assist the continent to achieve its Health Security and Sovereignty Agenda, “strengthening its capacity to build resilient health systems, improve preparedness, and reduce dependency by producing, financing and managing more of its own health priorities.” Sikela told the launch that the EU and AU are also working on a global health resilience initiative, with the aim of launching it in May. “This will be a powerful tool, bringing together research with medical technology and innovation programmes, knowledge transfer and systematic cooperation with regulatory agencies, health systems and highly skilled workforces,” he said. “The aim is to equip and empower health systems worldwide so that they are in a better position to prevent and respond to future crises,” he concluded, adding that this includes European investment in the local manufacturing of vaccines and medicines “to avoid health dependency.” Welcoming the initiatives, Ethiopian Health Minister Dr Mekdes Daba noted that “a crisis in one region can, with alarming speed, become a challenge for the continent and the world. From COVID-19 to mpox and the recent Marburg outbreak, we have learnt that preparedness cannot be deferred.” Regions with Worst Air Pollution Receive Least Amount of Philanthropic Support 21/04/2026 Sophia Samantaroy A new report on the status of philanthropy in air pollution from the Clean Air Fund found spending on preserving air quality heavily skewed in favor of North America, which enjoys cleaner air compared to Africa and Latin America. Less than 0.1% of all philanthropic funding has gone to the fight for clean air. Yet globally, nearly eight million deaths are attributed to the particles and gases that pollute the air – making air pollution the second biggest risk factor for premature death after high blood pressure. “Air pollution is one of the world’s largest public health threats,” said Dr Christa Hasenkopf, senior fellow at the Clean Air Fund (CAF). “And not only do we underfund it, we’re not directing the funds available to where they’re needed most. Africa has twice the population of North America and more than twice the air pollution, yet it receives 35 times less philanthropic air quality funding.” CAF’s report on philanthropic funding in air pollution reveals steep disparities in funding, where regions suffering from the worst polluted air receive the least amount of funding. Worldwide, 99% of people live in environments that exceed the World Health Organization’s (WHO) air quality guidelines. CAF found that between 2019 and 2023, philanthropic funding was heavily skewed towards North America, which received 35% of total outdoor air quality funding – yet thanks to over 50 years of clean air regulation, it broadly enjoys clean air. Meanwhile, Africa and Latin America received only 1% and 2% of funding, respectively. The lack of funding also has implications for air quality monitoring, crucial for protecting public health and guiding policies. Hasenkopf noted that “over a third of countries still don’t monitor their air quality at all. But this is a story about opportunity, not just neglect: even modest philanthropic investments in local capacity can unlock pollution reduction for nearly a billion people.” Philanthropies continue to play a critical role in environmental health, especially as unprecedented aid cuts rock the global aid economy. Africa, parts of Asia neglected Peak air pollution levels in the Indo-Gangetic plain, which includes Nepal, Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan. South Asian countries outside of India have a fraction of air quality funds compared to India. While North America has historically enjoyed the largest portion of philanthropic clean air investments at $165.6 million between 2019 and 2023, India and China have also received a significant share of funding- $77.9 million and $43.4 million respectively. CAF analyzed China and India separately from the rest of the Asia region because, in doing so, their report reveals a broader imbalance within Asia. Several Asian countries, notably Nepal, Bangladesh, and Pakistan, have faced some of the most dangerous air quality levels in the past decade. Pakistan and Bangladesh have ranked first and second for the highest levels of fine particulate matter in the world, according to the Swiss-based air quality organization, IQAir. Yet despite this burden, Asian countries -excluding India and China – received only 7% of outdoor air quality philanthropic funding. An IQAir map highlights the scarcity of monitoring data in poor air quality regions like the African continent. In Africa and Latin America, which are also high-need regions, funding remained “particularly low.” Four of the top 10 most air-polluted countries are in African: Chad, the DRC, Uganda, and Egypt. While Latin America has historically enjoyed cleaner air than its regional counterparts and innovative urban design in its cities, many areas still suffer from a lack of air pollution monitoring. The two regions received only 0.9% and 1.5% of total philanthropic outdoor air quality funding between 2019 and 2023, respectively. Philanthropic air quality funding by region between 2019 and 2023. However, the report notes a positive shift in funding to the Global South. The distribution of outdoor air quality funding grew from $5.1 million to $19.8 million in Asia – excluding China and India – and from $1.5 million to $2.2 million in Africa between 2022 and 2023. These figures are still dwarfed by the funding available in North America, although it is decreasing: from $56.2 million in 2022 to $25.1 million in 2023. “The fact that the funds are going to North America and others, is because communities have organized and demanded clean air,” said Dr Maria Neira, WHO’s former director of the environment, in a statement to Health Policy Watch. “We need to ensure that philanthropies are focusing the resources to create demand from the civil society in the countries most affected,” Neira said. Philanthropies step in to shore up funding A philanthropic success story: A map of the contiguous United States, depicting the efforts of the Sierra Club’s campaign to transition away from coal power plants. Retired plants shown in gray; yellow circles denote partially operating; red show fully operating. Historic aid cuts to global health, environment, and humanitarian assistance during 2025 sent shock waves through these sectors – and have jeopardized the lives of millions. The report acknowledges that philanthropies alone cannot fill the gaps left behind by the US and other governments, “they can ensure vital work can continue.” In the past year, Bloomberg Philanthropies has stepped in to cover the US’s funding for the UN Climate convention, while the Skoll and MacArthur Foundations pledged to increase giving after the dismantlement of USAID. Philanthropies are in a unique position to drive progress on clean air. These groups have the flexibility to take greater risks and fund early-stage innovations, pilots, and advocacy campaigns, the report notes – all without the debt burden typically associated with official government-given development assistance. Philanthropies also provide leadership in the political space through lending evidence, raising awareness of air pollution risks, and lobbying. “While philanthropies cannot fill the entire finance gap on their own, we’ve seen the hugely impactful domino effect they create,” said CAF CEO Jane Burston. “Their investments [accelerate] public policy and catalysing public and private finance.” Most of these projects fall under policy and awareness efforts, though the report highlights the need for technical projects like monitoring. Philanthropies have catalyzed change in the air pollution space for decades. In 2002, the Sierra Club launched its Beyond Coal Campaign, one of the most “extensive, effective, and long-lasting campaigns in the history of the environmental movement.” The campaign has advocated shifting away from coal to more renewable sources. Funding needed for other polluting sectors Young people trained by the Green African Youth Organization (GAYO) in Ghana, sort and divert waste from being burned. Philanthropic funding has primarily focused on the transportation sector, with 61% of funding supporting projects such as bus electrification or protecting pedestrian walkways away from busy roads. Other polluting sectors received a far smaller share of funding, notably the energy sector, agriculture, and the waste management sector. “Diversifying investments across sectors can help address several sources of emissions that significantly affect both health and climate outcomes,” the report argues. The waste management sector in particular could greatly benefit from addressing open air burning of solid waste and reducing methane and black carbon emissions. Burning waste generates toxic plumes of dioxins, furans, and heavy metals. More recent research has also pointed to the practice for releasing microplastics into the air. Several grassroots organizations, like the Green African Youth Organization (GAYO) in Ghana, Botswana, and Uganda, have projects that aim to reduce open-air burning and deploy air quality sensors to track open-burning hotspots. GAYO’s anti-incineration and no-burn campaign has trained more than 100 municipal officers and environmental health workers in community-level enforcement and education across Ghana. Their Zero Waste Cities initiative in Accra has recovered 50 to 75 tonnes of waste per month, diverting materials from both landfills and open burning. Engaging in these sectors beyond transportation – like in clean cooking and agricultural practices such as moving away from crop residue burning –“will be critical for improving public health, reducing inequality, and accelerating progress towards cleaner air and a more sustainable future,” the report argues. A call to increase philanthropic giving Waste workers join protest over air pollution exposure in Delhi. In the past several years, the rate of growth in philanthropic funding in clean air has slowed. While the raw numbers of funds invested have more than doubled between 2019 and 2023, reaching a total of $478 million, philanthropic funding for outdoor air quality is showing “signs of stagnation,” the report warns. Between 2022 and 2023, funding grew by only 2%, from $123.1 million to $125.8 million, the report says. Image Credits: Igor Karimov/ Unsplash, University of Chicago , IQAir, Clean Air Fund , Sierra Club, Clean Air Fund. Microplastics: Brain Study Confirms Health Risks, Challenges Kennedy’s Claims 20/04/2026 Felix Sassmannshausen & Sophia Samantaroy A new study reveals how microplastics are infiltrating human brain tissue. A joint announcement by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Health and Human Services (HHS) on microplastics made inaccurate claims about how many plastic particles exist in the brain, while providing an unclear regulatory plan to address this. But a study published in Nature Health found microplastics in nearly every one of its 191 human brain samples. US Health Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr hailed a federal proposal by the EPA to track microplastics contamination in drinking water earlier this month as “a turning point” in the effort to confront microplastics that have “become embedded in modern life.” Kennedy, the leading figure of the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement claimed that there is roughly a “spoonful of plastic in every human brain,” but a newly published study in the journal Nature Health challenges this alarming statistic – while also finding a proliferation of plastic in human brains. The mainly Chinese and US-affiliated researchers analysed 191 brain tissue samples collected across China, using advanced techniques, including laser direct infrared spectroscopy (LDIR) and pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS), to detect micro- and nanoplastics. They found that human brains actually average 50.3 micrograms per gram of healthy tissue, suggesting actual exposure levels are nearly 100 times – or two orders of magnitude – lower than a contested older study cited by Kennedy. Despite this significantly lower concentration, the new findings notably confirm the presence of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) in 100% of the healthy post-mortem brains analysed and in 99.4% of diseased brains. “This study provides evidence of MNP presence in the living human brain, highlighting a need for further research to understand causal links between MNPs and human disease,” Runting Li and colleagues wrote in the publication released on Monday. The toxic legacy of plastic additives This diagram from the Nature Health study maps the presence of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) in the diseased human brain, detailing median concentrations The threat of micro- and nanoplastics contamination in the brain tissue raises significant concern as they can penetrate the blood-brain barrier, where they are subsequently engulfed by the brain’s immune cells, known as microglia. Because these synthetic particles cannot be biologically degraded, they accumulate within the tissue and can trigger severe oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and chronic neuroinflammation. Furthermore, clinical data from patients with brain cancer reveal a concerning correlation regarding tumour progression. The Nature Health researchers found that a larger microplastic surface area within the tissue was positively associated with faster tumour growth and proliferation. The danger extends beyond the physical particles to the thousands of chemical additives used during manufacturing, such as bisphenols and phthalates, which are known endocrine disruptors linked to a host of chronic diseases. Additionally, the degrading particles act as highly effective carriers for other environmental pollutants, absorbing heavy metals, pesticides, and even viruses to carry these dangerous hitchhikers directly into the human bloodstream. This combined chemical and physical burden drives severe health outcomes. Clinical studies indicate that patients with detectable microplastic contamination in their arterial plaque face a 4.5-fold higher risk of suffering a heart attack, stroke, or death within three years. Validating urgent research needs Experts analysing the new study voiced concerns over potential false positives and laboratory contamination. However, the new study, which was evaluated by independent experts, also faces criticism. Scientists raised concerns about methodological flaws, warning that the imaging techniques likely produced false positives by mistaking human proteins for polyamide and human fats for polyethylene, the world’s most common plastic. In a statement to press evaluating the research, Dr Dieter Fischer, head of the microplastics working group at the Leibniz Institute of Polymer Research in Dresden, Germany, argued it is highly unlikely that the identified particles actually originated from the human tissue samples. He suggested the results are likely to be skewed by laboratory contamination and the fundamental difficulty of distinguishing plastics from natural human hydrocarbons. Conversely, other experts not involved in the study praised the researchers for utilising multiple analytical methods, noting that this dual approach makes the findings significantly more robust than previous research. Dr Martin Wagner, head of the bioanalytical toxicology lab at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, concluded that these new metrics regarding the presence and quantity of microplastics in the brain are much more dependable than prior estimates. Furthermore, neuro-oncology experts stress that the higher plastic concentrations found near brain tumours are merely an association, as aggressive tumours actively destroy the blood-brain barrier to allow external particles to passively accumulate. The Nature Health authors acknowledge this unproven causal relationship, warning that their findings should be interpreted with caution to avoid unnecessary public alarm. Standardising microplastics contamination research Despite efforts to define nanoplastics, there is still no standardised protocol for detection. This warning underscores the necessity of further research and standardisation, as the absence of unified detection and reporting protocols makes it very difficult to compare data across studies and reliably estimate human exposure levels. While studies generally describe microplastics as fragments ranging from one micrometre to five millimetres and nanoplastics as an even smaller subfraction measuring under one micrometre, these smallest particles are frequently neglected in research due to current methodological limitations. “The laboratory methods to study micro- and nanoparticles and their health effects are still evolving,” Dr Rebecca Florsheim, a research physician at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine, noted in a statement to the American Lung Association last month. Recognising that current scientific methods remain limited, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) launched a $144 million initiative called the Systematic Targeting of Microplastics (STOMP)nearlier this month. Led by the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), the programme aims to build gold-standard clinical tests to accurately measure, map and ultimately remove microplastics contamination from the human body. Overlooking exposure routes Experts warn that focusing solely on water may overlook other critical pathways for microplastic exposure, including through inhalation and eating processed foods. While public health experts expressed support for the EPA’s proposal to add microplastics and pharmaceuticals to the draft Sixth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 6) for public drinking water, they warn that the focus on water and attempts to “eliminate microplastics from the human body” are too narrow. The CCL6/CCL does not actually regulate America’s public drinking water but signals that a contaminant “warrants serious scientific attention and may be considered for future regulatory action,” the agency noted. Other experts worry that this focus could lead to different critical exposure routes being overlooked. Environmental groups have urged agencies to prioritise the reduction of synthetic textiles, as these fabrics continuously shed microfibers that contaminate indoor air and are inhaled, and also easily bypass wastewater filtration systems. In addition, research by Dr Samantha Romanick, a scientist at the nonprofit Environmental Working Group (EWG), shows that ultra-processed foods typically contain higher plastic levels than less processed alternatives. This contamination largely occurs during industrial manufacturing, as ingredients undergo multiple processing stages and are continually exposed to shedding plastic from conveyor belts, tubes, and packaging. Furthermore, researchers behind the recent brain study discovered that routine surgical equipment, including plastic syringes and intravenous infusion sets, actively sheds microplastics directly into vulnerable patients. They calculated that a single surgical operation could introduce over 30,000 microplastics directly into the bloodstream, bypassing the gut and lungs entirely. “With the widespread use of plastic-based medical devices, MNP contamination in clinical environments is probably unavoidable,” Runting Li and colleagues warned in their Nature Health paper. They stressed that this direct exposure pathway demands global attention and the urgent establishment of stringent quality-control standards within the healthcare industry. The world’s burden of plastic ingestion Global human consumption of microplastics has now grown to six times the rate in 1990. The scale of global exposure extends far beyond the borders of the United States, as human consumption of microplastics has grown to six times the rate recorded in 1990. This burden falls disproportionately on Southeast Asia, which experiences some of the world’s highest microplastic ingestion rates due to severe contamination within its seafood-rich diets. Advocates claim that addressing this crisis requires shifting the focus away from individual consumer choices or speculative human treatment, and toward stringent corporate accountability and the absolute reduction of plastic use and water regulation. To this end, the global community is looking toward the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on Plastic Pollution, which aims to develop a legally binding international treaty. However, progress on the treaty remains slow as major plastic-producing nations, including the US, strongly oppose limits on plastic production. “While we did not land the treaty text we hoped for, we at UNEP will continue the work against plastic pollution,” said Inger Andersen, executive director of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) at the close of last year’s negotiations. “Pollution that is in our groundwater, in our soil, in our rivers, in our oceans and yes, in our bodies.” Image Credits: European Union, Nature Health, Felix Sassmannshausen/HPW, Andreas Mattern/UFZ via EU Commission, Taichi Nakamura via Unsplash. Bangladesh Tightens Control Over Tobacco But Excludes Smokeless Products 20/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan Around a quarter of Bangladeshi men smoke, which has major health impacts. Bangladesh’s new government has approved a wide-ranging anti-tobacco law that bans advertising, promotion and display across print, electronic, digital and social media, entertainment platforms and points of sale. The Smoking and Tobacco Usage (Control) (Amendment) Law, 2025 also prohibits corporate social responsibility initiatives from using tobacco brand names, logos or trademarks. Cigarette packs have to carry pictorial health warnings covering at least 75% of their surface and include the contact numbers of the national quit line. It also expands smoke-free public places and bans the sale and use of tobacco products within 100 meters of schools, hospitals, clinics and playgrounds. This is one of the first laws passed by the government of Prime Minister Tarique Rahman, who was sworn in last month after winning elections in February. Rahman’s Bangladesh National Party took over from an interim administration installed after an uprising in 2024 removed Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and her Awami League from power. the country has a high prevalence of tobacco use, with an estimated 25% of men in Bangladesh smoking – over 21 million. In 2023, around a quarter of deaths among men and 10% of women’s deaths were caused by tobacco – almost 200,000 people in total, according to the Tobacco Atlas. In addition to the substantial health burden, the annual cost of illness attributable to smoking in Bangladesh is estimated to be 730.63 billion takas (approximately US$5.9 billion). Vapes excluded The law does not cover newer tobacco and nicotine products, including vapes, heated tobacco products, electronic nicotine delivery systems and nicotine pouches. This is despite almost 25% of people using smokeless tobacco products, according to the Tobacco Atlas. Welcoming the law, Gan Quan, Vital Strategies’ senior vice president for tobacco control, urged its quick implementation. “This is a positive step, setting the stage to save millions of lives and deliver economic gains, so we must seize this moment with continued collaboration among government agencies, civil society and public health partners, and continuing public education about the harms caused by tobacco,” he said. “Together, we must remain vigilant against the industry’s attempts to subvert or delay these measures and further strengthen policy to address the regulation of emerging tobacco and nicotine products. There is an urgent need to protect youth in particular from being targeted with these products.” Smita Baruah, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids executive vice-president, said that the new measures “will drive down rates of tobacco use, save lives and protect kids from addiction to tobacco.” “Tobacco companies know that strong tobacco control laws work to stop people from smoking and prevent young people from starting to smoke, so they do everything in their power to undermine lifesaving laws like this. It is crucial that these measures be protected from the interests of the world’s largest tobacco companies,” she added. Image Credits: Simon Reza/ Unsplash. Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Include Access to Safe Abortion Services 20/04/2026 Maggie De Block Although the World Health Organization (WHO) recognises comprehensive abortion care as an essential health service, countries all over the world are tightening access, inspired by the United States. But all this means is worse outcomes for women’s health There is a persistent myth that restricting abortion stops it from happening. What restrictions really do – predictably and tragically – is make abortion unsafe. The WHO reports that around 73 million abortions occur worldwide each year, of which – remarkably – 45% are unsafe. The 2017 WHO–Guttmacher report found that 97% of unsafe abortions occurred in developing countries, particularly in Africa, Asia and Latin America, and WHO’s 2022 abortion care guideline notes that around seven million women in developing countries are treated for complications of unsafe abortion every year. Those are only the women who make it to care. Many do not. A preventable cause of maternal mortality The mortality gap between safe and unsafe abortion is stark. In settings where abortion is safe and legal, deaths are rare; where it is unsafe, the risks rise dramatically because the procedure is carried out by unskilled people or in environments that do not meet minimum medical standards, or both. Maternal deaths due to unsafe abortion are often misclassified and under-reported. A review encompassing the period 2009–20 found that 8% of maternal deaths globally were linked to abortion. In low- and middle-income countries, the impact of unsafe abortion is compounded by weak primary care systems, provider shortages, long travel distances, punitive laws, and stigma. The result is delay, secrecy, shame, and complications that could have been prevented. Put simply: when states fail to provide access to safe care, women do not stop seeking abortions. Rather, they are placed in unnecessary danger, with serious health, social and economic consequences. Safe abortion is a basic human right Access to safe abortion is grounded in international human rights law, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. In Africa, the Maputo Protocol provides an especially important regional anchor for women’s reproductive rights. Many human rights bodies and mechanisms agree that lack of access to quality abortion care risks violating the rights of women and girls, including the right to life; the right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health; the right to benefit from scientific progress and its realisation; the right to decide freely and responsibly on the number, spacing and timing of children; rights to privacy and to freedom from discrimination, and the right to be free from torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment. Human rights bodies have also noted that restrictions on access to abortion affect some women disproportionately. The UN Working Group on Discrimination Against Women in Law and in Practice has observed that “in countries where induced termination of pregnancy is restricted by law and/or otherwise unavailable, safe termination of pregnancy is a privilege of the rich, while women with limited resources have little choice but to resort to unsafe providers.” The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women has expressed particular concern that “rural women are more likely to resort to unsafe abortion than their urban counterparts”. The same is true for adolescents, who frequently lack information. The Committee on the Rights of the Child has urged States “to decriminalise abortion to ensure that girls have access to safe abortion and postabortion services, review legislation with a view to guaranteeing the best interests of pregnant adolescents and ensure that their views are always heard and respected in abortion-related decisions.” Comprehensive abortion care is more than medicines The practical case for ensuring access to abortion services is also strong because the tools already exist. WHO’s 2023 clinical guidance and self-care recommendations recognise medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol as a safe and effective option, and these medicines are included on the WHO Essential Medicines List. The WHO guideline also states that medical abortion can be self-managed using mifepristone plus misoprostol or misoprostol alone where people have accurate information and access to a trained health worker if needed. In resource-constrained settings, that matters enormously. Medication abortion can reduce dependence on scarce specialist infrastructure, make earlier care more feasible, and expand access to rural and other underserved women. But medicines alone are not enough. Women also need quality-assured products, clear information, referral pathways, pain management, and emergency backup if needed. A tablet without a system to support its use is not access. Comprehensive abortion care also includes contraception, counselling and information, timely diagnosis, medical or surgical abortion where appropriate, and post-abortion care for complications after miscarriage or unsafe abortion. Post-abortion care is not an optional extra. Abortion access is shaped by many other policies and practices: access to contraception, laws on marital consent, approaches to gender-based violence, access to adoption services, affordability, provider bias, supply chains, transport, privacy and digital information, religious views, and whether women trust the health system enough to use it. If someone must travel for hours, pay out of pocket, or be shamed and harassed for seeking care, she does not have real access. What governments and donors must do: Reform laws and regulations that criminalise or unduly restrict abortion care. Criminalisation of abortion must end. Punitive laws on women and service providers drive delay, secrecy and unsafe methods. Make mifepristone and misoprostol reliably available and affordable. Registration, procurement, quality assurance and distribution are essential policy choices. Integrate abortion into primary health care and universal health coverage packages. Abortion should not be separate from routine sexual, reproductive and maternal health services. Expand provider training and task-sharing. WHO guidance supports community service models, which are crucial in workforce-constrained settings. Guarantee access to post-abortion care. Even in restrictive settings, treating complications is an absolute minimum standard. Invest in information, privacy and building trust. Women need accurate information and safe pathways into care, with compassion, and without stigma. The choice is political The impact of unsafe abortion on maternal mortality is indisputable. The medicines and standards of care for safe abortion are well established. The rights framework is clear. What remains is a political choice – whether governments, donors and multilateral institutions will treat safe abortion as basic health care or continue to support a hierarchy in which women suffer indignity and die of preventable causes while others pass judgement. Above all, let’s start from this simple premise: women and girls are not vessels for state or religious ideology. They are rights-holders. If governments are serious about realising the right to health and reducing maternal mortality, then safe abortion access must be part of the plan – explicitly, urgently, and at scale. Maggie De Block served as Belgium’s Minister of Social Affairs and Health from 2014 to 2020. She is a medical doctor and a member of the Belgian Chamber of Representatives. Image Credits: Center for Reproductive Rights. ‘A Unique Moment’: New Regional Air Pollution Plans Aim to Cut Health Burden Across Latin America 17/04/2026 Sophia Samantaroy Medellin, Colombia’s second largest city, is located in the northern Andes, where smog becomes trapped through meteorological temperature inversions. The Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO) will soon unveil a new Roadmap on Air Quality and Health, following on from a meeting with countries and other stakeholders in February in Mexico. The PAHO strategy dovetails with an ambitious new regional action plan by the UN Environment Programme – which supports the work of environment ministries. While the high mountains of the Andes might be associated in popular imagination with crystal clear air, in fact, these 4000+ meter high mountains also trap air pollution, smothering cities nestled in their towering ranges. It is visual testimony to the health impacts of an air pollution problem that kills some 370,000 people annually across Latin America and the Caribbean. But Latin American and Caribbean countries are at a “unique moment” in terms of opportunities to improve air quality, marking a critical pivot toward treating air pollution not merely as an environmental byproduct, but as a top-tier public health emergency, according to Juan J Castillo who leads the air quality team at PAHO, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) regional office for the Americas. “We see this action plan as an opportunity to send a strong message to the region, to the ministers of health and the environment, that there is a clear case for health in improving air quality,” said Juan Castillo. His team has been leading the plan’s development while also working to bolster collaboration across Latin America, connecting ministries of the environment and health, and closing the air pollution monitoring gap. Meeting the WHO goal to halve deaths from air pollution by 2040 Latin American cities are already taking climate adaptation measures, like Barranquilla, shown here. But air pollution experts highlight the health benefits of green urban desgin. The action plan comes a year after the World Health Organization’s second conference on Air pollution and health, hosted in Cartagena, Colombia. A core aim of the plan is to create a pathway for meeting the WHO target set out at the Cartagena meeting of halving deaths from air pollution by 2040. At the conference, some 20 countries, including many from the Latin American region, made related pledges. But the action plan aims to mainstream the goal into the plans of health ministries. Over 700 stakeholders gathered in Cartagena, Colombia, for the 2nd WHO Air Pollution and Health in 2025. “This is truly a pivotal point,” Castillo said. “Latin America requires solutions that respond to the specific needs of the region. This is why it is charting its own path towards cleaner air- and one that could inspire other lower- and middle-income nations, fostering further South-South cooperation.” Latin America and the Caribbean already have cleaner air, on average, than hot spots like South East Asia, there is still a long way to go to achieve the World Health Organization quality goals. Some cities in the region actually meet WHO air quality guidelines for particulate matter (PM2.5) and others exceed them “only” by one to two times. However, a number of cities in Chile, Brazil, Bolivia and Peru, have average annual PM2.5 concentrations reaching 3-5 times above WHO guidelines, according to the 2025 report of the Swiss-based monitoring firm, IQ-Air. Lima, Peru is one noteworthy example. The health argument for cleaner skies Local authorities in Lima, Peru promote cycling as part of a sustainable mobility effort. “The evidence shows that there is a huge burden of disease linked to air pollution in the region,” said Castillo. “Air pollution is one of the leading causes of non-communicable diseases and also for all kinds of morbidity, such as asthma attacks, respiratory infections and impaired cognitive development. So we’re focused on using the evidence to help countries make the best decision to achieve their public health goals.” Many countries in Latin America have implemented steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but these climate policies often neglect to consider the health benefits of tackling climate pollutants. These health impact assessments of climate mitigation are crucial and are included in the Organization’s Air Quality and Health Plan for Latin America and the Caribbean, said Castillo. “We need to understand the health gains to bolster the argument for environmental policies and to help with the strategic importance of these policies.” Integrating air quality action on climate change “can be particularly beneficial, as it broadens access to funding and delivers greater public health benefits,” notes a December 2025 regional action strategy by the UNEP-hosted Climate and Clean Air Coalition. Action needed beyond the health sector An all-electric bus in Brasilia is one of many rolled out across Latin America. The CCAC strategy is targeted to ministries of the environment, while the PAHO roadmap focuses on ministries of health. But the two aim to work in tandem to build political will for systemic changes that reduce air pollution. Such changes typically require action on finance, transport, building and household energy systems, urban design and waste management – well beyond the traditional domain of health ministries. In terms of transport, a major air pollution factor, Latin America historically has had stronger public transport systems than many other developing regions, and cities such as Curitiba and Bogota became pioneers in developing Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) as well as cycle networks, which helped reduce emissions from private automobiles. Baranquilla has pioneered several clean transport initiatives, such as electric buses, as shown in a Transformative Urban Mobility Initiative brochure. But too often, BRT systems in the region have remained too dependent on dirty diesel – where cleaner electric systems are needed to really clean up the air further. Now, there is a move to electrify BRT systems in key Latin American cities such as Brasilia, Brazil and Barranquilla, Colombia, supported partly by German development assistance as well as local initiatives. Barranquilla, Colombia, has undergone a massive urban renewal effort with the aim of shifting to a 50% electric bus fleet by 2034. Public transport is being integrated with cycle networks and pedestrian-friendly streets – about 30% of travel is on foot – supporting healthier, more active, and low-emissions mobility. PAHO hopes that more cities can see the health benefits of urban design – and use climate funding for greener cities that foster public health. Closing the monitoring and data gap The new PAHO roadmap advocates for better air quality monitoring to better inform policymakers. Tracking air quality progress has been a challenge for the region. Less than 40% of countries have a government standard for chronic exposure to the most dangerous form of particulate pollution, PM2.5. Without these standards, governments cannot chart further regulation to clean up polluted skies. The region has also struggled with tracking air quality. Only a third of cities in the region have active reference monitoring stations- or local inventories of criteria pollutant emissions, active air management programs, or government-published health impact assessments, according to the most recent regional action plan. And only seven cities have air quality forecasting systems. The data that is available raises several concerns. Of the 58 cities with PM2.5 data, only one city complies with the WHO guideline values. The region of Latin America and the Caribbean has, on average, enjoys cleaner air than South Asia or the African continent. Much of the poorer air quality is in urban centers and the Andean region. “Many cities lack key tools, or those that exist are not operational, up to date, or in use, while their populations remain exposed to harmful pollution levels,” says CCAC in its 2025 regional strategy. A consortium of South American researchers echoed that, in a 2025 review that stated: “South America would greatly benefit from expanded monitoring networks, improved air quality modeling, and detailed health data to better understand exposure–health relationships and multipollutant interactions.” Grassroots organizers like Ana Badillo, a co-founder of the Ecuador-based advocacy group Pacha Ayllu, have also championed access to real-time air quality data through the expanded use by “citizen-scientists” of low-cost air pollution sensors in the capital city of Quito. “This citizen-led monitoring network is designed to empower individuals and communities to better understand the quality of the air they breathe and make informed decisions to protect their health and that of their loved ones,” said Badillo in a recent post. The democratization of data is also central to the new CCAC strategy, which is promoting its AQMx Platform, a digital hub designed to support air quality management exchange and integrate conventional air quality monitoring with low-cost sensor networks, relying more on civil society groups like Pacha Ayllu. Collaborating across sectors At COP30 in Belém in 2025, Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus signaled a historic shift by formalizing the Belém Health Action Plan, highlighting the urgency of climate action for health. With funding an “obvious” challenge for cleaning up Latin America’s air, PAHO and its partners have emphasized the health gains of environmental interventions to help governments understand the strategic importance of such changes. In relation to that, collaboration across the energy and environmental sectors is key, says Castillo, whose office is also working closely with the UNEP-hosted CCAC. Tapping into energy sector investments also means cleaner, more affordable, and reliable energy. The new CCAC strategy targets not only air pollution, but a “triple planetary crisis” – climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution – by focusing on the reduction of “super pollutants” like black carbon and methane a precursor of ground level ozone (O3), as well as a powerful climate pollutant. But black carbon and methane do not remain long in the atmosphere, reductions can yield rapid gains for health as well as climate. By making air quality projects “bankable” for multilateral giants like the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), the plan seeks to move beyond sporadic grants toward a flexible financing architecture that includes green bonds and blended finance. Mexico City: a story of success A combination of Mexico City’s high population, geography, and occasional wildfires have made clean air a challenge for decades. Castillo pointed to the example of Mexico City, which once had some of the most polluted air in the Americas, or even the world, as a story of success. It was grassroots organizations that agitated for clean air protections. “They demanded action,” Castillo said. “And many other places are following suit.” Mexico City has developed a robust air quality monitoring system, NowCast – and one of the most ambitious goals for reducing short-lived climate pollutants in the region. “It has helped enormously in terms of health protection, because we can now warn people much sooner, telling them not to go outside, not to exercise outdoors and to avoid inhaling highly polluted air,” said Sergio Zirath, Mexico’s director general of Industry, Clean Energy and Air Quality Management in an interview with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Mexico has now stepped in to provide technical advice to other countries across the region on clean air solutions. Although this is an effort being led by PAHO, an organization that also includes Canada and the United States, by definition as a strategy for Latin America and the Caribbean, neither are part of this new strategy. “PAHO respects every country’s decision on how they want to manage their policy. Our focus is based on evidence, action and available data,” said Castillo, when asked about the absence of the US from regional clean air activities since the Trump administration took over in January 2025. But in the end, Castillo hopes this strategic plan – an undertaking that still includes 21 countries, civil society, and PAHO – will be more than “just another document.” Instead, he hopes it will provide countries with an opportunity to capitalize on changes already happening in the region – ones that might even clean up the air in the region’s worst-polluted cities suffering from smog buffered by the high Andes. Image Credits: Municipality of Bethlehem, S. Samantaroy/HPW, Partnerships for Health Cities, TUMI, IQAir, IQAir, WHO/PAHO/Karina Zambrana . From Vaccines to Racism: RFK Faces Barrage of Questions in House Committee 16/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan Representative Linda Sanchez (left) questioning Kennedy about the explosion of measles cases under his watch. Undermining vaccines, failing pregnant black women, threatening to remove black children with ADHD from their parents – these were some of the barrage of questions put to United States Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr when he appeared before the House Ways and Means Committee on Thursday. Kennedy was testifying about the Trump administration’s 2027 budget, which proposes to cut the HHS budget by 12,5% – including deep cuts for HIV programmes ($923 million less), maternal and child health ($561m), and mental health ($576m). The Trump 2027 budget also proposes to eliminate $4.3 billion from the US government’s global health budget, which falls under the US State Department. Massive measles increase There has been a 675% increase in measles cases since Kennedy was appointed in February last year, according to US Representative Linda Sanchez. “In 2024, under the Biden administration, there were 258 cases of measles. And in 2025, under your leadership at HHS, this ballooned to over 2,000 [cases]. That’s a 675% increase, and we are now on track to suppress to surpass that this year, with over 1,600 confirmed cases in just three and a half months,” said Sanchez. Pointing to the death last year of a six-year-old unvaccinated girl from measles, the first death of a US child from measles in a decade, Sanchez asked Kennedy whether a measles vaccine could have saved her life. “It’s possible,” Kennedy answered. Robert F Kennedy Jr testifying before the House Ways and Means Committee. Sanchez tore into Kennedy for orchestrating the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) decision to remove its “universal vaccine recommendations for children covering seven immunizations, including things like flu, covid, hepatitis A, hepatitis B and rotavirus.” She also quoted Kennedy’s claim on Fox News last year that the adverse effects from the measles vaccine “cause deaths every year… and causes all the illnesses that measles itself causes.” Sanchez said that “CDC data shows that about 80% of children who died from flu this season were not vaccinated, [and] the anti-vaccine rhetoric you ran on and the anti-vaccine actions you have taken over the last year clearly correlates with the dramatic increases in preventable diseases.” She asked Kennedy repeatedly whether Trump agreed with the CDC decision to “suspend public health messaging on vaccines last February” – but Kennedy dodged the question, claiming Sanchez has “a lot of misinformation”. Representative Mike Thompson said that Kennedy is “helping make diseases deadly again.” “Kids have died because measles is running rampant under your watch, in large part because President Trump allowed your conspiracy theories to run our public health,” said Thompson. Undermining health of black women “Black women are nearly three times more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than white women, yet the Trump administration is undermining black maternal health from all sides,” said Representative Danny Davis, a leader of the Congressional Black Caucus. He cited the Trump administration’s decision to cut $1 trillion from Medicaid, “which pays for 40% of births”, the proposed cuts to maternal and child care for 2027, and cuts to research. “DOGE [Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency] cancelled funds for several research projects that could save countless black mothers, like the Morehouse School of Medicine research on improving the health of black pregnant and postpartum women,” said Davis. “How can we lower black maternal health experiences if we’re cutting funds for these critical programmes, and the administration is saying that you can’t consider race or ethnicity in healthcare?” In response, Kennedy claimed that there had been “tremendous duplication” in programmes and “we are investing huge amounts of money in maternal health.” The US has the highest maternal mortality rate in the developed world. ‘Reparenting’ black children? Representative Terri Sewell (centre) raised Kennedy’s comments that black children on ADHD medication should be “reparented” Describing various comments made by Kennedy as “outlandish and frankly disturbing”, Representative Terri Sewell took issue with his stating during a podcast interview that black children on ADHD medication should be “reparented”. “You said every black kid is now just standardly put on Adderall, SSRIs, benzos, which are known to induce violence, and that those children are going to have to go somewhere to get reparented,” said Sewell, reminding Kennedy that there was a long history of black children being removed from their parents, dating back to slavery. Despite Kennedy’s comments being recorded, he denied making them and said he “doesn’t even know what reparenting means”. Budget chief under pressure Meanwhile, health activists interrupted the testimony of Russell Vought, head of the US Office of Management and Budget (OMB), before the House Budget Committee on Wednesday. Minutes after Vought began his opening statement on the 2027 budget proposal, protesters tood up, holding up posters and shouting slogans accusing the Trump administration of killing people with HIV, and urging the administration to spend the funds Congress has allocated to the US President’s Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (PEPFAR). ”Russell Vought is directly responsible for illegally withholding Congressionally appropriated funds for PEPFAR and related global health initiatives. These funding disruptions have already contributed to preventable deaths and threaten to reverse decades of progress in the fight against HIV worldwide,” said Charles King, CEO of Housing Works, in a statement from the protestors issued by Health Gap. They accuse Vought of “blatant defiance of the will of Congress, which has fully funded PEPFAR programs for FY25 and FY26 over Vought’s objections, including by rejecting $400 million in rescission of PEPFAR funding in 2025.” “The FY27 President’s budget request for HIV and global health would eliminate HIV-specific and all disease-specific programming, while slashing overall global health funding by 46% compared with FY26 levels ($9.4 billion in FY26; $5.4 billion proposed in FY27 the President’s budget request),” according to the statement. “In addition to proposing deadly funding cuts, the FY27 budget request also disparages scientific evidence in global health, particularly regarding highly effective methods of HIV prevention, suggesting elimination of funding for condoms and programs for LGBTQ+ people, who face disproportionately high HIV risk of HIV infection due to criminalization and stigma,” according to the statement. Vought also recently diverted $15 million in USAID funding aimed at lifesaving humanitarian assistance to pay for his personal security, according to Reuters. Vought, former vice-president of the right-wing think tank Heritage Foundation, co-authored Project 2025, the conservative blueprint for governance being followed by the Trump administration. Posts navigation Older posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Africa and Europe Announce €100 Million in Joint Initiatives to Strengthen Health Systems 21/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan German Ambassador to Ethiopia Birgitt Ory, Africa CDC Director General Dr Jean Kaseya, Jozef Síkela, European Commissioner for International Partnerships, and Ethiopian Health Minister Dr Mekdes Daba. The African Union and the European Commission have concluded three agreements worth €100 million aimed at strengthening Africa’s health systems. The first initiative supports the national public health institutes of 10 African countries to enhance disease surveillance, early warning systems, emergency response, research and laboratory services. The second, announced at the One Health Summit in Leon earlier this month, involves addressing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and developing a workforce trained in a ‘One Health’ approach to detect and prevent health threats in animals, humans and the environment. The third involves expanding digital health solutions for pandemic preparedness and stronger primary healthcare systems in six African countries. The initiatives were officially launched at the African Union headquarters on Tuesday by Jozef Síkela, European Commissioner for International Partnerships, and Dr Jean Kaseya, Director General of Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, which is the operational partner for the initiatives. “Health remains at the top of the EU’s political agenda, including in the shifting geopolitical landscape. While the others are stepping away, we are stepping up,” Sikela told the launch. “Recent history showed us that a health crisis in one region can turn very quickly into a global emergency, an economic crisis and a security threat. Investing in global health is a strategic investment, not a gesture.” Kaseya said that the support will assist the continent to achieve its Health Security and Sovereignty Agenda, “strengthening its capacity to build resilient health systems, improve preparedness, and reduce dependency by producing, financing and managing more of its own health priorities.” Sikela told the launch that the EU and AU are also working on a global health resilience initiative, with the aim of launching it in May. “This will be a powerful tool, bringing together research with medical technology and innovation programmes, knowledge transfer and systematic cooperation with regulatory agencies, health systems and highly skilled workforces,” he said. “The aim is to equip and empower health systems worldwide so that they are in a better position to prevent and respond to future crises,” he concluded, adding that this includes European investment in the local manufacturing of vaccines and medicines “to avoid health dependency.” Welcoming the initiatives, Ethiopian Health Minister Dr Mekdes Daba noted that “a crisis in one region can, with alarming speed, become a challenge for the continent and the world. From COVID-19 to mpox and the recent Marburg outbreak, we have learnt that preparedness cannot be deferred.” Regions with Worst Air Pollution Receive Least Amount of Philanthropic Support 21/04/2026 Sophia Samantaroy A new report on the status of philanthropy in air pollution from the Clean Air Fund found spending on preserving air quality heavily skewed in favor of North America, which enjoys cleaner air compared to Africa and Latin America. Less than 0.1% of all philanthropic funding has gone to the fight for clean air. Yet globally, nearly eight million deaths are attributed to the particles and gases that pollute the air – making air pollution the second biggest risk factor for premature death after high blood pressure. “Air pollution is one of the world’s largest public health threats,” said Dr Christa Hasenkopf, senior fellow at the Clean Air Fund (CAF). “And not only do we underfund it, we’re not directing the funds available to where they’re needed most. Africa has twice the population of North America and more than twice the air pollution, yet it receives 35 times less philanthropic air quality funding.” CAF’s report on philanthropic funding in air pollution reveals steep disparities in funding, where regions suffering from the worst polluted air receive the least amount of funding. Worldwide, 99% of people live in environments that exceed the World Health Organization’s (WHO) air quality guidelines. CAF found that between 2019 and 2023, philanthropic funding was heavily skewed towards North America, which received 35% of total outdoor air quality funding – yet thanks to over 50 years of clean air regulation, it broadly enjoys clean air. Meanwhile, Africa and Latin America received only 1% and 2% of funding, respectively. The lack of funding also has implications for air quality monitoring, crucial for protecting public health and guiding policies. Hasenkopf noted that “over a third of countries still don’t monitor their air quality at all. But this is a story about opportunity, not just neglect: even modest philanthropic investments in local capacity can unlock pollution reduction for nearly a billion people.” Philanthropies continue to play a critical role in environmental health, especially as unprecedented aid cuts rock the global aid economy. Africa, parts of Asia neglected Peak air pollution levels in the Indo-Gangetic plain, which includes Nepal, Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan. South Asian countries outside of India have a fraction of air quality funds compared to India. While North America has historically enjoyed the largest portion of philanthropic clean air investments at $165.6 million between 2019 and 2023, India and China have also received a significant share of funding- $77.9 million and $43.4 million respectively. CAF analyzed China and India separately from the rest of the Asia region because, in doing so, their report reveals a broader imbalance within Asia. Several Asian countries, notably Nepal, Bangladesh, and Pakistan, have faced some of the most dangerous air quality levels in the past decade. Pakistan and Bangladesh have ranked first and second for the highest levels of fine particulate matter in the world, according to the Swiss-based air quality organization, IQAir. Yet despite this burden, Asian countries -excluding India and China – received only 7% of outdoor air quality philanthropic funding. An IQAir map highlights the scarcity of monitoring data in poor air quality regions like the African continent. In Africa and Latin America, which are also high-need regions, funding remained “particularly low.” Four of the top 10 most air-polluted countries are in African: Chad, the DRC, Uganda, and Egypt. While Latin America has historically enjoyed cleaner air than its regional counterparts and innovative urban design in its cities, many areas still suffer from a lack of air pollution monitoring. The two regions received only 0.9% and 1.5% of total philanthropic outdoor air quality funding between 2019 and 2023, respectively. Philanthropic air quality funding by region between 2019 and 2023. However, the report notes a positive shift in funding to the Global South. The distribution of outdoor air quality funding grew from $5.1 million to $19.8 million in Asia – excluding China and India – and from $1.5 million to $2.2 million in Africa between 2022 and 2023. These figures are still dwarfed by the funding available in North America, although it is decreasing: from $56.2 million in 2022 to $25.1 million in 2023. “The fact that the funds are going to North America and others, is because communities have organized and demanded clean air,” said Dr Maria Neira, WHO’s former director of the environment, in a statement to Health Policy Watch. “We need to ensure that philanthropies are focusing the resources to create demand from the civil society in the countries most affected,” Neira said. Philanthropies step in to shore up funding A philanthropic success story: A map of the contiguous United States, depicting the efforts of the Sierra Club’s campaign to transition away from coal power plants. Retired plants shown in gray; yellow circles denote partially operating; red show fully operating. Historic aid cuts to global health, environment, and humanitarian assistance during 2025 sent shock waves through these sectors – and have jeopardized the lives of millions. The report acknowledges that philanthropies alone cannot fill the gaps left behind by the US and other governments, “they can ensure vital work can continue.” In the past year, Bloomberg Philanthropies has stepped in to cover the US’s funding for the UN Climate convention, while the Skoll and MacArthur Foundations pledged to increase giving after the dismantlement of USAID. Philanthropies are in a unique position to drive progress on clean air. These groups have the flexibility to take greater risks and fund early-stage innovations, pilots, and advocacy campaigns, the report notes – all without the debt burden typically associated with official government-given development assistance. Philanthropies also provide leadership in the political space through lending evidence, raising awareness of air pollution risks, and lobbying. “While philanthropies cannot fill the entire finance gap on their own, we’ve seen the hugely impactful domino effect they create,” said CAF CEO Jane Burston. “Their investments [accelerate] public policy and catalysing public and private finance.” Most of these projects fall under policy and awareness efforts, though the report highlights the need for technical projects like monitoring. Philanthropies have catalyzed change in the air pollution space for decades. In 2002, the Sierra Club launched its Beyond Coal Campaign, one of the most “extensive, effective, and long-lasting campaigns in the history of the environmental movement.” The campaign has advocated shifting away from coal to more renewable sources. Funding needed for other polluting sectors Young people trained by the Green African Youth Organization (GAYO) in Ghana, sort and divert waste from being burned. Philanthropic funding has primarily focused on the transportation sector, with 61% of funding supporting projects such as bus electrification or protecting pedestrian walkways away from busy roads. Other polluting sectors received a far smaller share of funding, notably the energy sector, agriculture, and the waste management sector. “Diversifying investments across sectors can help address several sources of emissions that significantly affect both health and climate outcomes,” the report argues. The waste management sector in particular could greatly benefit from addressing open air burning of solid waste and reducing methane and black carbon emissions. Burning waste generates toxic plumes of dioxins, furans, and heavy metals. More recent research has also pointed to the practice for releasing microplastics into the air. Several grassroots organizations, like the Green African Youth Organization (GAYO) in Ghana, Botswana, and Uganda, have projects that aim to reduce open-air burning and deploy air quality sensors to track open-burning hotspots. GAYO’s anti-incineration and no-burn campaign has trained more than 100 municipal officers and environmental health workers in community-level enforcement and education across Ghana. Their Zero Waste Cities initiative in Accra has recovered 50 to 75 tonnes of waste per month, diverting materials from both landfills and open burning. Engaging in these sectors beyond transportation – like in clean cooking and agricultural practices such as moving away from crop residue burning –“will be critical for improving public health, reducing inequality, and accelerating progress towards cleaner air and a more sustainable future,” the report argues. A call to increase philanthropic giving Waste workers join protest over air pollution exposure in Delhi. In the past several years, the rate of growth in philanthropic funding in clean air has slowed. While the raw numbers of funds invested have more than doubled between 2019 and 2023, reaching a total of $478 million, philanthropic funding for outdoor air quality is showing “signs of stagnation,” the report warns. Between 2022 and 2023, funding grew by only 2%, from $123.1 million to $125.8 million, the report says. Image Credits: Igor Karimov/ Unsplash, University of Chicago , IQAir, Clean Air Fund , Sierra Club, Clean Air Fund. Microplastics: Brain Study Confirms Health Risks, Challenges Kennedy’s Claims 20/04/2026 Felix Sassmannshausen & Sophia Samantaroy A new study reveals how microplastics are infiltrating human brain tissue. A joint announcement by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Health and Human Services (HHS) on microplastics made inaccurate claims about how many plastic particles exist in the brain, while providing an unclear regulatory plan to address this. But a study published in Nature Health found microplastics in nearly every one of its 191 human brain samples. US Health Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr hailed a federal proposal by the EPA to track microplastics contamination in drinking water earlier this month as “a turning point” in the effort to confront microplastics that have “become embedded in modern life.” Kennedy, the leading figure of the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement claimed that there is roughly a “spoonful of plastic in every human brain,” but a newly published study in the journal Nature Health challenges this alarming statistic – while also finding a proliferation of plastic in human brains. The mainly Chinese and US-affiliated researchers analysed 191 brain tissue samples collected across China, using advanced techniques, including laser direct infrared spectroscopy (LDIR) and pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS), to detect micro- and nanoplastics. They found that human brains actually average 50.3 micrograms per gram of healthy tissue, suggesting actual exposure levels are nearly 100 times – or two orders of magnitude – lower than a contested older study cited by Kennedy. Despite this significantly lower concentration, the new findings notably confirm the presence of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) in 100% of the healthy post-mortem brains analysed and in 99.4% of diseased brains. “This study provides evidence of MNP presence in the living human brain, highlighting a need for further research to understand causal links between MNPs and human disease,” Runting Li and colleagues wrote in the publication released on Monday. The toxic legacy of plastic additives This diagram from the Nature Health study maps the presence of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) in the diseased human brain, detailing median concentrations The threat of micro- and nanoplastics contamination in the brain tissue raises significant concern as they can penetrate the blood-brain barrier, where they are subsequently engulfed by the brain’s immune cells, known as microglia. Because these synthetic particles cannot be biologically degraded, they accumulate within the tissue and can trigger severe oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and chronic neuroinflammation. Furthermore, clinical data from patients with brain cancer reveal a concerning correlation regarding tumour progression. The Nature Health researchers found that a larger microplastic surface area within the tissue was positively associated with faster tumour growth and proliferation. The danger extends beyond the physical particles to the thousands of chemical additives used during manufacturing, such as bisphenols and phthalates, which are known endocrine disruptors linked to a host of chronic diseases. Additionally, the degrading particles act as highly effective carriers for other environmental pollutants, absorbing heavy metals, pesticides, and even viruses to carry these dangerous hitchhikers directly into the human bloodstream. This combined chemical and physical burden drives severe health outcomes. Clinical studies indicate that patients with detectable microplastic contamination in their arterial plaque face a 4.5-fold higher risk of suffering a heart attack, stroke, or death within three years. Validating urgent research needs Experts analysing the new study voiced concerns over potential false positives and laboratory contamination. However, the new study, which was evaluated by independent experts, also faces criticism. Scientists raised concerns about methodological flaws, warning that the imaging techniques likely produced false positives by mistaking human proteins for polyamide and human fats for polyethylene, the world’s most common plastic. In a statement to press evaluating the research, Dr Dieter Fischer, head of the microplastics working group at the Leibniz Institute of Polymer Research in Dresden, Germany, argued it is highly unlikely that the identified particles actually originated from the human tissue samples. He suggested the results are likely to be skewed by laboratory contamination and the fundamental difficulty of distinguishing plastics from natural human hydrocarbons. Conversely, other experts not involved in the study praised the researchers for utilising multiple analytical methods, noting that this dual approach makes the findings significantly more robust than previous research. Dr Martin Wagner, head of the bioanalytical toxicology lab at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, concluded that these new metrics regarding the presence and quantity of microplastics in the brain are much more dependable than prior estimates. Furthermore, neuro-oncology experts stress that the higher plastic concentrations found near brain tumours are merely an association, as aggressive tumours actively destroy the blood-brain barrier to allow external particles to passively accumulate. The Nature Health authors acknowledge this unproven causal relationship, warning that their findings should be interpreted with caution to avoid unnecessary public alarm. Standardising microplastics contamination research Despite efforts to define nanoplastics, there is still no standardised protocol for detection. This warning underscores the necessity of further research and standardisation, as the absence of unified detection and reporting protocols makes it very difficult to compare data across studies and reliably estimate human exposure levels. While studies generally describe microplastics as fragments ranging from one micrometre to five millimetres and nanoplastics as an even smaller subfraction measuring under one micrometre, these smallest particles are frequently neglected in research due to current methodological limitations. “The laboratory methods to study micro- and nanoparticles and their health effects are still evolving,” Dr Rebecca Florsheim, a research physician at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine, noted in a statement to the American Lung Association last month. Recognising that current scientific methods remain limited, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) launched a $144 million initiative called the Systematic Targeting of Microplastics (STOMP)nearlier this month. Led by the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), the programme aims to build gold-standard clinical tests to accurately measure, map and ultimately remove microplastics contamination from the human body. Overlooking exposure routes Experts warn that focusing solely on water may overlook other critical pathways for microplastic exposure, including through inhalation and eating processed foods. While public health experts expressed support for the EPA’s proposal to add microplastics and pharmaceuticals to the draft Sixth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 6) for public drinking water, they warn that the focus on water and attempts to “eliminate microplastics from the human body” are too narrow. The CCL6/CCL does not actually regulate America’s public drinking water but signals that a contaminant “warrants serious scientific attention and may be considered for future regulatory action,” the agency noted. Other experts worry that this focus could lead to different critical exposure routes being overlooked. Environmental groups have urged agencies to prioritise the reduction of synthetic textiles, as these fabrics continuously shed microfibers that contaminate indoor air and are inhaled, and also easily bypass wastewater filtration systems. In addition, research by Dr Samantha Romanick, a scientist at the nonprofit Environmental Working Group (EWG), shows that ultra-processed foods typically contain higher plastic levels than less processed alternatives. This contamination largely occurs during industrial manufacturing, as ingredients undergo multiple processing stages and are continually exposed to shedding plastic from conveyor belts, tubes, and packaging. Furthermore, researchers behind the recent brain study discovered that routine surgical equipment, including plastic syringes and intravenous infusion sets, actively sheds microplastics directly into vulnerable patients. They calculated that a single surgical operation could introduce over 30,000 microplastics directly into the bloodstream, bypassing the gut and lungs entirely. “With the widespread use of plastic-based medical devices, MNP contamination in clinical environments is probably unavoidable,” Runting Li and colleagues warned in their Nature Health paper. They stressed that this direct exposure pathway demands global attention and the urgent establishment of stringent quality-control standards within the healthcare industry. The world’s burden of plastic ingestion Global human consumption of microplastics has now grown to six times the rate in 1990. The scale of global exposure extends far beyond the borders of the United States, as human consumption of microplastics has grown to six times the rate recorded in 1990. This burden falls disproportionately on Southeast Asia, which experiences some of the world’s highest microplastic ingestion rates due to severe contamination within its seafood-rich diets. Advocates claim that addressing this crisis requires shifting the focus away from individual consumer choices or speculative human treatment, and toward stringent corporate accountability and the absolute reduction of plastic use and water regulation. To this end, the global community is looking toward the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on Plastic Pollution, which aims to develop a legally binding international treaty. However, progress on the treaty remains slow as major plastic-producing nations, including the US, strongly oppose limits on plastic production. “While we did not land the treaty text we hoped for, we at UNEP will continue the work against plastic pollution,” said Inger Andersen, executive director of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) at the close of last year’s negotiations. “Pollution that is in our groundwater, in our soil, in our rivers, in our oceans and yes, in our bodies.” Image Credits: European Union, Nature Health, Felix Sassmannshausen/HPW, Andreas Mattern/UFZ via EU Commission, Taichi Nakamura via Unsplash. Bangladesh Tightens Control Over Tobacco But Excludes Smokeless Products 20/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan Around a quarter of Bangladeshi men smoke, which has major health impacts. Bangladesh’s new government has approved a wide-ranging anti-tobacco law that bans advertising, promotion and display across print, electronic, digital and social media, entertainment platforms and points of sale. The Smoking and Tobacco Usage (Control) (Amendment) Law, 2025 also prohibits corporate social responsibility initiatives from using tobacco brand names, logos or trademarks. Cigarette packs have to carry pictorial health warnings covering at least 75% of their surface and include the contact numbers of the national quit line. It also expands smoke-free public places and bans the sale and use of tobacco products within 100 meters of schools, hospitals, clinics and playgrounds. This is one of the first laws passed by the government of Prime Minister Tarique Rahman, who was sworn in last month after winning elections in February. Rahman’s Bangladesh National Party took over from an interim administration installed after an uprising in 2024 removed Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and her Awami League from power. the country has a high prevalence of tobacco use, with an estimated 25% of men in Bangladesh smoking – over 21 million. In 2023, around a quarter of deaths among men and 10% of women’s deaths were caused by tobacco – almost 200,000 people in total, according to the Tobacco Atlas. In addition to the substantial health burden, the annual cost of illness attributable to smoking in Bangladesh is estimated to be 730.63 billion takas (approximately US$5.9 billion). Vapes excluded The law does not cover newer tobacco and nicotine products, including vapes, heated tobacco products, electronic nicotine delivery systems and nicotine pouches. This is despite almost 25% of people using smokeless tobacco products, according to the Tobacco Atlas. Welcoming the law, Gan Quan, Vital Strategies’ senior vice president for tobacco control, urged its quick implementation. “This is a positive step, setting the stage to save millions of lives and deliver economic gains, so we must seize this moment with continued collaboration among government agencies, civil society and public health partners, and continuing public education about the harms caused by tobacco,” he said. “Together, we must remain vigilant against the industry’s attempts to subvert or delay these measures and further strengthen policy to address the regulation of emerging tobacco and nicotine products. There is an urgent need to protect youth in particular from being targeted with these products.” Smita Baruah, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids executive vice-president, said that the new measures “will drive down rates of tobacco use, save lives and protect kids from addiction to tobacco.” “Tobacco companies know that strong tobacco control laws work to stop people from smoking and prevent young people from starting to smoke, so they do everything in their power to undermine lifesaving laws like this. It is crucial that these measures be protected from the interests of the world’s largest tobacco companies,” she added. Image Credits: Simon Reza/ Unsplash. Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Include Access to Safe Abortion Services 20/04/2026 Maggie De Block Although the World Health Organization (WHO) recognises comprehensive abortion care as an essential health service, countries all over the world are tightening access, inspired by the United States. But all this means is worse outcomes for women’s health There is a persistent myth that restricting abortion stops it from happening. What restrictions really do – predictably and tragically – is make abortion unsafe. The WHO reports that around 73 million abortions occur worldwide each year, of which – remarkably – 45% are unsafe. The 2017 WHO–Guttmacher report found that 97% of unsafe abortions occurred in developing countries, particularly in Africa, Asia and Latin America, and WHO’s 2022 abortion care guideline notes that around seven million women in developing countries are treated for complications of unsafe abortion every year. Those are only the women who make it to care. Many do not. A preventable cause of maternal mortality The mortality gap between safe and unsafe abortion is stark. In settings where abortion is safe and legal, deaths are rare; where it is unsafe, the risks rise dramatically because the procedure is carried out by unskilled people or in environments that do not meet minimum medical standards, or both. Maternal deaths due to unsafe abortion are often misclassified and under-reported. A review encompassing the period 2009–20 found that 8% of maternal deaths globally were linked to abortion. In low- and middle-income countries, the impact of unsafe abortion is compounded by weak primary care systems, provider shortages, long travel distances, punitive laws, and stigma. The result is delay, secrecy, shame, and complications that could have been prevented. Put simply: when states fail to provide access to safe care, women do not stop seeking abortions. Rather, they are placed in unnecessary danger, with serious health, social and economic consequences. Safe abortion is a basic human right Access to safe abortion is grounded in international human rights law, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. In Africa, the Maputo Protocol provides an especially important regional anchor for women’s reproductive rights. Many human rights bodies and mechanisms agree that lack of access to quality abortion care risks violating the rights of women and girls, including the right to life; the right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health; the right to benefit from scientific progress and its realisation; the right to decide freely and responsibly on the number, spacing and timing of children; rights to privacy and to freedom from discrimination, and the right to be free from torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment. Human rights bodies have also noted that restrictions on access to abortion affect some women disproportionately. The UN Working Group on Discrimination Against Women in Law and in Practice has observed that “in countries where induced termination of pregnancy is restricted by law and/or otherwise unavailable, safe termination of pregnancy is a privilege of the rich, while women with limited resources have little choice but to resort to unsafe providers.” The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women has expressed particular concern that “rural women are more likely to resort to unsafe abortion than their urban counterparts”. The same is true for adolescents, who frequently lack information. The Committee on the Rights of the Child has urged States “to decriminalise abortion to ensure that girls have access to safe abortion and postabortion services, review legislation with a view to guaranteeing the best interests of pregnant adolescents and ensure that their views are always heard and respected in abortion-related decisions.” Comprehensive abortion care is more than medicines The practical case for ensuring access to abortion services is also strong because the tools already exist. WHO’s 2023 clinical guidance and self-care recommendations recognise medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol as a safe and effective option, and these medicines are included on the WHO Essential Medicines List. The WHO guideline also states that medical abortion can be self-managed using mifepristone plus misoprostol or misoprostol alone where people have accurate information and access to a trained health worker if needed. In resource-constrained settings, that matters enormously. Medication abortion can reduce dependence on scarce specialist infrastructure, make earlier care more feasible, and expand access to rural and other underserved women. But medicines alone are not enough. Women also need quality-assured products, clear information, referral pathways, pain management, and emergency backup if needed. A tablet without a system to support its use is not access. Comprehensive abortion care also includes contraception, counselling and information, timely diagnosis, medical or surgical abortion where appropriate, and post-abortion care for complications after miscarriage or unsafe abortion. Post-abortion care is not an optional extra. Abortion access is shaped by many other policies and practices: access to contraception, laws on marital consent, approaches to gender-based violence, access to adoption services, affordability, provider bias, supply chains, transport, privacy and digital information, religious views, and whether women trust the health system enough to use it. If someone must travel for hours, pay out of pocket, or be shamed and harassed for seeking care, she does not have real access. What governments and donors must do: Reform laws and regulations that criminalise or unduly restrict abortion care. Criminalisation of abortion must end. Punitive laws on women and service providers drive delay, secrecy and unsafe methods. Make mifepristone and misoprostol reliably available and affordable. Registration, procurement, quality assurance and distribution are essential policy choices. Integrate abortion into primary health care and universal health coverage packages. Abortion should not be separate from routine sexual, reproductive and maternal health services. Expand provider training and task-sharing. WHO guidance supports community service models, which are crucial in workforce-constrained settings. Guarantee access to post-abortion care. Even in restrictive settings, treating complications is an absolute minimum standard. Invest in information, privacy and building trust. Women need accurate information and safe pathways into care, with compassion, and without stigma. The choice is political The impact of unsafe abortion on maternal mortality is indisputable. The medicines and standards of care for safe abortion are well established. The rights framework is clear. What remains is a political choice – whether governments, donors and multilateral institutions will treat safe abortion as basic health care or continue to support a hierarchy in which women suffer indignity and die of preventable causes while others pass judgement. Above all, let’s start from this simple premise: women and girls are not vessels for state or religious ideology. They are rights-holders. If governments are serious about realising the right to health and reducing maternal mortality, then safe abortion access must be part of the plan – explicitly, urgently, and at scale. Maggie De Block served as Belgium’s Minister of Social Affairs and Health from 2014 to 2020. She is a medical doctor and a member of the Belgian Chamber of Representatives. Image Credits: Center for Reproductive Rights. ‘A Unique Moment’: New Regional Air Pollution Plans Aim to Cut Health Burden Across Latin America 17/04/2026 Sophia Samantaroy Medellin, Colombia’s second largest city, is located in the northern Andes, where smog becomes trapped through meteorological temperature inversions. The Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO) will soon unveil a new Roadmap on Air Quality and Health, following on from a meeting with countries and other stakeholders in February in Mexico. The PAHO strategy dovetails with an ambitious new regional action plan by the UN Environment Programme – which supports the work of environment ministries. While the high mountains of the Andes might be associated in popular imagination with crystal clear air, in fact, these 4000+ meter high mountains also trap air pollution, smothering cities nestled in their towering ranges. It is visual testimony to the health impacts of an air pollution problem that kills some 370,000 people annually across Latin America and the Caribbean. But Latin American and Caribbean countries are at a “unique moment” in terms of opportunities to improve air quality, marking a critical pivot toward treating air pollution not merely as an environmental byproduct, but as a top-tier public health emergency, according to Juan J Castillo who leads the air quality team at PAHO, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) regional office for the Americas. “We see this action plan as an opportunity to send a strong message to the region, to the ministers of health and the environment, that there is a clear case for health in improving air quality,” said Juan Castillo. His team has been leading the plan’s development while also working to bolster collaboration across Latin America, connecting ministries of the environment and health, and closing the air pollution monitoring gap. Meeting the WHO goal to halve deaths from air pollution by 2040 Latin American cities are already taking climate adaptation measures, like Barranquilla, shown here. But air pollution experts highlight the health benefits of green urban desgin. The action plan comes a year after the World Health Organization’s second conference on Air pollution and health, hosted in Cartagena, Colombia. A core aim of the plan is to create a pathway for meeting the WHO target set out at the Cartagena meeting of halving deaths from air pollution by 2040. At the conference, some 20 countries, including many from the Latin American region, made related pledges. But the action plan aims to mainstream the goal into the plans of health ministries. Over 700 stakeholders gathered in Cartagena, Colombia, for the 2nd WHO Air Pollution and Health in 2025. “This is truly a pivotal point,” Castillo said. “Latin America requires solutions that respond to the specific needs of the region. This is why it is charting its own path towards cleaner air- and one that could inspire other lower- and middle-income nations, fostering further South-South cooperation.” Latin America and the Caribbean already have cleaner air, on average, than hot spots like South East Asia, there is still a long way to go to achieve the World Health Organization quality goals. Some cities in the region actually meet WHO air quality guidelines for particulate matter (PM2.5) and others exceed them “only” by one to two times. However, a number of cities in Chile, Brazil, Bolivia and Peru, have average annual PM2.5 concentrations reaching 3-5 times above WHO guidelines, according to the 2025 report of the Swiss-based monitoring firm, IQ-Air. Lima, Peru is one noteworthy example. The health argument for cleaner skies Local authorities in Lima, Peru promote cycling as part of a sustainable mobility effort. “The evidence shows that there is a huge burden of disease linked to air pollution in the region,” said Castillo. “Air pollution is one of the leading causes of non-communicable diseases and also for all kinds of morbidity, such as asthma attacks, respiratory infections and impaired cognitive development. So we’re focused on using the evidence to help countries make the best decision to achieve their public health goals.” Many countries in Latin America have implemented steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but these climate policies often neglect to consider the health benefits of tackling climate pollutants. These health impact assessments of climate mitigation are crucial and are included in the Organization’s Air Quality and Health Plan for Latin America and the Caribbean, said Castillo. “We need to understand the health gains to bolster the argument for environmental policies and to help with the strategic importance of these policies.” Integrating air quality action on climate change “can be particularly beneficial, as it broadens access to funding and delivers greater public health benefits,” notes a December 2025 regional action strategy by the UNEP-hosted Climate and Clean Air Coalition. Action needed beyond the health sector An all-electric bus in Brasilia is one of many rolled out across Latin America. The CCAC strategy is targeted to ministries of the environment, while the PAHO roadmap focuses on ministries of health. But the two aim to work in tandem to build political will for systemic changes that reduce air pollution. Such changes typically require action on finance, transport, building and household energy systems, urban design and waste management – well beyond the traditional domain of health ministries. In terms of transport, a major air pollution factor, Latin America historically has had stronger public transport systems than many other developing regions, and cities such as Curitiba and Bogota became pioneers in developing Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) as well as cycle networks, which helped reduce emissions from private automobiles. Baranquilla has pioneered several clean transport initiatives, such as electric buses, as shown in a Transformative Urban Mobility Initiative brochure. But too often, BRT systems in the region have remained too dependent on dirty diesel – where cleaner electric systems are needed to really clean up the air further. Now, there is a move to electrify BRT systems in key Latin American cities such as Brasilia, Brazil and Barranquilla, Colombia, supported partly by German development assistance as well as local initiatives. Barranquilla, Colombia, has undergone a massive urban renewal effort with the aim of shifting to a 50% electric bus fleet by 2034. Public transport is being integrated with cycle networks and pedestrian-friendly streets – about 30% of travel is on foot – supporting healthier, more active, and low-emissions mobility. PAHO hopes that more cities can see the health benefits of urban design – and use climate funding for greener cities that foster public health. Closing the monitoring and data gap The new PAHO roadmap advocates for better air quality monitoring to better inform policymakers. Tracking air quality progress has been a challenge for the region. Less than 40% of countries have a government standard for chronic exposure to the most dangerous form of particulate pollution, PM2.5. Without these standards, governments cannot chart further regulation to clean up polluted skies. The region has also struggled with tracking air quality. Only a third of cities in the region have active reference monitoring stations- or local inventories of criteria pollutant emissions, active air management programs, or government-published health impact assessments, according to the most recent regional action plan. And only seven cities have air quality forecasting systems. The data that is available raises several concerns. Of the 58 cities with PM2.5 data, only one city complies with the WHO guideline values. The region of Latin America and the Caribbean has, on average, enjoys cleaner air than South Asia or the African continent. Much of the poorer air quality is in urban centers and the Andean region. “Many cities lack key tools, or those that exist are not operational, up to date, or in use, while their populations remain exposed to harmful pollution levels,” says CCAC in its 2025 regional strategy. A consortium of South American researchers echoed that, in a 2025 review that stated: “South America would greatly benefit from expanded monitoring networks, improved air quality modeling, and detailed health data to better understand exposure–health relationships and multipollutant interactions.” Grassroots organizers like Ana Badillo, a co-founder of the Ecuador-based advocacy group Pacha Ayllu, have also championed access to real-time air quality data through the expanded use by “citizen-scientists” of low-cost air pollution sensors in the capital city of Quito. “This citizen-led monitoring network is designed to empower individuals and communities to better understand the quality of the air they breathe and make informed decisions to protect their health and that of their loved ones,” said Badillo in a recent post. The democratization of data is also central to the new CCAC strategy, which is promoting its AQMx Platform, a digital hub designed to support air quality management exchange and integrate conventional air quality monitoring with low-cost sensor networks, relying more on civil society groups like Pacha Ayllu. Collaborating across sectors At COP30 in Belém in 2025, Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus signaled a historic shift by formalizing the Belém Health Action Plan, highlighting the urgency of climate action for health. With funding an “obvious” challenge for cleaning up Latin America’s air, PAHO and its partners have emphasized the health gains of environmental interventions to help governments understand the strategic importance of such changes. In relation to that, collaboration across the energy and environmental sectors is key, says Castillo, whose office is also working closely with the UNEP-hosted CCAC. Tapping into energy sector investments also means cleaner, more affordable, and reliable energy. The new CCAC strategy targets not only air pollution, but a “triple planetary crisis” – climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution – by focusing on the reduction of “super pollutants” like black carbon and methane a precursor of ground level ozone (O3), as well as a powerful climate pollutant. But black carbon and methane do not remain long in the atmosphere, reductions can yield rapid gains for health as well as climate. By making air quality projects “bankable” for multilateral giants like the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), the plan seeks to move beyond sporadic grants toward a flexible financing architecture that includes green bonds and blended finance. Mexico City: a story of success A combination of Mexico City’s high population, geography, and occasional wildfires have made clean air a challenge for decades. Castillo pointed to the example of Mexico City, which once had some of the most polluted air in the Americas, or even the world, as a story of success. It was grassroots organizations that agitated for clean air protections. “They demanded action,” Castillo said. “And many other places are following suit.” Mexico City has developed a robust air quality monitoring system, NowCast – and one of the most ambitious goals for reducing short-lived climate pollutants in the region. “It has helped enormously in terms of health protection, because we can now warn people much sooner, telling them not to go outside, not to exercise outdoors and to avoid inhaling highly polluted air,” said Sergio Zirath, Mexico’s director general of Industry, Clean Energy and Air Quality Management in an interview with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Mexico has now stepped in to provide technical advice to other countries across the region on clean air solutions. Although this is an effort being led by PAHO, an organization that also includes Canada and the United States, by definition as a strategy for Latin America and the Caribbean, neither are part of this new strategy. “PAHO respects every country’s decision on how they want to manage their policy. Our focus is based on evidence, action and available data,” said Castillo, when asked about the absence of the US from regional clean air activities since the Trump administration took over in January 2025. But in the end, Castillo hopes this strategic plan – an undertaking that still includes 21 countries, civil society, and PAHO – will be more than “just another document.” Instead, he hopes it will provide countries with an opportunity to capitalize on changes already happening in the region – ones that might even clean up the air in the region’s worst-polluted cities suffering from smog buffered by the high Andes. Image Credits: Municipality of Bethlehem, S. Samantaroy/HPW, Partnerships for Health Cities, TUMI, IQAir, IQAir, WHO/PAHO/Karina Zambrana . From Vaccines to Racism: RFK Faces Barrage of Questions in House Committee 16/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan Representative Linda Sanchez (left) questioning Kennedy about the explosion of measles cases under his watch. Undermining vaccines, failing pregnant black women, threatening to remove black children with ADHD from their parents – these were some of the barrage of questions put to United States Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr when he appeared before the House Ways and Means Committee on Thursday. Kennedy was testifying about the Trump administration’s 2027 budget, which proposes to cut the HHS budget by 12,5% – including deep cuts for HIV programmes ($923 million less), maternal and child health ($561m), and mental health ($576m). The Trump 2027 budget also proposes to eliminate $4.3 billion from the US government’s global health budget, which falls under the US State Department. Massive measles increase There has been a 675% increase in measles cases since Kennedy was appointed in February last year, according to US Representative Linda Sanchez. “In 2024, under the Biden administration, there were 258 cases of measles. And in 2025, under your leadership at HHS, this ballooned to over 2,000 [cases]. That’s a 675% increase, and we are now on track to suppress to surpass that this year, with over 1,600 confirmed cases in just three and a half months,” said Sanchez. Pointing to the death last year of a six-year-old unvaccinated girl from measles, the first death of a US child from measles in a decade, Sanchez asked Kennedy whether a measles vaccine could have saved her life. “It’s possible,” Kennedy answered. Robert F Kennedy Jr testifying before the House Ways and Means Committee. Sanchez tore into Kennedy for orchestrating the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) decision to remove its “universal vaccine recommendations for children covering seven immunizations, including things like flu, covid, hepatitis A, hepatitis B and rotavirus.” She also quoted Kennedy’s claim on Fox News last year that the adverse effects from the measles vaccine “cause deaths every year… and causes all the illnesses that measles itself causes.” Sanchez said that “CDC data shows that about 80% of children who died from flu this season were not vaccinated, [and] the anti-vaccine rhetoric you ran on and the anti-vaccine actions you have taken over the last year clearly correlates with the dramatic increases in preventable diseases.” She asked Kennedy repeatedly whether Trump agreed with the CDC decision to “suspend public health messaging on vaccines last February” – but Kennedy dodged the question, claiming Sanchez has “a lot of misinformation”. Representative Mike Thompson said that Kennedy is “helping make diseases deadly again.” “Kids have died because measles is running rampant under your watch, in large part because President Trump allowed your conspiracy theories to run our public health,” said Thompson. Undermining health of black women “Black women are nearly three times more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than white women, yet the Trump administration is undermining black maternal health from all sides,” said Representative Danny Davis, a leader of the Congressional Black Caucus. He cited the Trump administration’s decision to cut $1 trillion from Medicaid, “which pays for 40% of births”, the proposed cuts to maternal and child care for 2027, and cuts to research. “DOGE [Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency] cancelled funds for several research projects that could save countless black mothers, like the Morehouse School of Medicine research on improving the health of black pregnant and postpartum women,” said Davis. “How can we lower black maternal health experiences if we’re cutting funds for these critical programmes, and the administration is saying that you can’t consider race or ethnicity in healthcare?” In response, Kennedy claimed that there had been “tremendous duplication” in programmes and “we are investing huge amounts of money in maternal health.” The US has the highest maternal mortality rate in the developed world. ‘Reparenting’ black children? Representative Terri Sewell (centre) raised Kennedy’s comments that black children on ADHD medication should be “reparented” Describing various comments made by Kennedy as “outlandish and frankly disturbing”, Representative Terri Sewell took issue with his stating during a podcast interview that black children on ADHD medication should be “reparented”. “You said every black kid is now just standardly put on Adderall, SSRIs, benzos, which are known to induce violence, and that those children are going to have to go somewhere to get reparented,” said Sewell, reminding Kennedy that there was a long history of black children being removed from their parents, dating back to slavery. Despite Kennedy’s comments being recorded, he denied making them and said he “doesn’t even know what reparenting means”. Budget chief under pressure Meanwhile, health activists interrupted the testimony of Russell Vought, head of the US Office of Management and Budget (OMB), before the House Budget Committee on Wednesday. Minutes after Vought began his opening statement on the 2027 budget proposal, protesters tood up, holding up posters and shouting slogans accusing the Trump administration of killing people with HIV, and urging the administration to spend the funds Congress has allocated to the US President’s Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (PEPFAR). ”Russell Vought is directly responsible for illegally withholding Congressionally appropriated funds for PEPFAR and related global health initiatives. These funding disruptions have already contributed to preventable deaths and threaten to reverse decades of progress in the fight against HIV worldwide,” said Charles King, CEO of Housing Works, in a statement from the protestors issued by Health Gap. They accuse Vought of “blatant defiance of the will of Congress, which has fully funded PEPFAR programs for FY25 and FY26 over Vought’s objections, including by rejecting $400 million in rescission of PEPFAR funding in 2025.” “The FY27 President’s budget request for HIV and global health would eliminate HIV-specific and all disease-specific programming, while slashing overall global health funding by 46% compared with FY26 levels ($9.4 billion in FY26; $5.4 billion proposed in FY27 the President’s budget request),” according to the statement. “In addition to proposing deadly funding cuts, the FY27 budget request also disparages scientific evidence in global health, particularly regarding highly effective methods of HIV prevention, suggesting elimination of funding for condoms and programs for LGBTQ+ people, who face disproportionately high HIV risk of HIV infection due to criminalization and stigma,” according to the statement. Vought also recently diverted $15 million in USAID funding aimed at lifesaving humanitarian assistance to pay for his personal security, according to Reuters. Vought, former vice-president of the right-wing think tank Heritage Foundation, co-authored Project 2025, the conservative blueprint for governance being followed by the Trump administration. Posts navigation Older posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Regions with Worst Air Pollution Receive Least Amount of Philanthropic Support 21/04/2026 Sophia Samantaroy A new report on the status of philanthropy in air pollution from the Clean Air Fund found spending on preserving air quality heavily skewed in favor of North America, which enjoys cleaner air compared to Africa and Latin America. Less than 0.1% of all philanthropic funding has gone to the fight for clean air. Yet globally, nearly eight million deaths are attributed to the particles and gases that pollute the air – making air pollution the second biggest risk factor for premature death after high blood pressure. “Air pollution is one of the world’s largest public health threats,” said Dr Christa Hasenkopf, senior fellow at the Clean Air Fund (CAF). “And not only do we underfund it, we’re not directing the funds available to where they’re needed most. Africa has twice the population of North America and more than twice the air pollution, yet it receives 35 times less philanthropic air quality funding.” CAF’s report on philanthropic funding in air pollution reveals steep disparities in funding, where regions suffering from the worst polluted air receive the least amount of funding. Worldwide, 99% of people live in environments that exceed the World Health Organization’s (WHO) air quality guidelines. CAF found that between 2019 and 2023, philanthropic funding was heavily skewed towards North America, which received 35% of total outdoor air quality funding – yet thanks to over 50 years of clean air regulation, it broadly enjoys clean air. Meanwhile, Africa and Latin America received only 1% and 2% of funding, respectively. The lack of funding also has implications for air quality monitoring, crucial for protecting public health and guiding policies. Hasenkopf noted that “over a third of countries still don’t monitor their air quality at all. But this is a story about opportunity, not just neglect: even modest philanthropic investments in local capacity can unlock pollution reduction for nearly a billion people.” Philanthropies continue to play a critical role in environmental health, especially as unprecedented aid cuts rock the global aid economy. Africa, parts of Asia neglected Peak air pollution levels in the Indo-Gangetic plain, which includes Nepal, Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan. South Asian countries outside of India have a fraction of air quality funds compared to India. While North America has historically enjoyed the largest portion of philanthropic clean air investments at $165.6 million between 2019 and 2023, India and China have also received a significant share of funding- $77.9 million and $43.4 million respectively. CAF analyzed China and India separately from the rest of the Asia region because, in doing so, their report reveals a broader imbalance within Asia. Several Asian countries, notably Nepal, Bangladesh, and Pakistan, have faced some of the most dangerous air quality levels in the past decade. Pakistan and Bangladesh have ranked first and second for the highest levels of fine particulate matter in the world, according to the Swiss-based air quality organization, IQAir. Yet despite this burden, Asian countries -excluding India and China – received only 7% of outdoor air quality philanthropic funding. An IQAir map highlights the scarcity of monitoring data in poor air quality regions like the African continent. In Africa and Latin America, which are also high-need regions, funding remained “particularly low.” Four of the top 10 most air-polluted countries are in African: Chad, the DRC, Uganda, and Egypt. While Latin America has historically enjoyed cleaner air than its regional counterparts and innovative urban design in its cities, many areas still suffer from a lack of air pollution monitoring. The two regions received only 0.9% and 1.5% of total philanthropic outdoor air quality funding between 2019 and 2023, respectively. Philanthropic air quality funding by region between 2019 and 2023. However, the report notes a positive shift in funding to the Global South. The distribution of outdoor air quality funding grew from $5.1 million to $19.8 million in Asia – excluding China and India – and from $1.5 million to $2.2 million in Africa between 2022 and 2023. These figures are still dwarfed by the funding available in North America, although it is decreasing: from $56.2 million in 2022 to $25.1 million in 2023. “The fact that the funds are going to North America and others, is because communities have organized and demanded clean air,” said Dr Maria Neira, WHO’s former director of the environment, in a statement to Health Policy Watch. “We need to ensure that philanthropies are focusing the resources to create demand from the civil society in the countries most affected,” Neira said. Philanthropies step in to shore up funding A philanthropic success story: A map of the contiguous United States, depicting the efforts of the Sierra Club’s campaign to transition away from coal power plants. Retired plants shown in gray; yellow circles denote partially operating; red show fully operating. Historic aid cuts to global health, environment, and humanitarian assistance during 2025 sent shock waves through these sectors – and have jeopardized the lives of millions. The report acknowledges that philanthropies alone cannot fill the gaps left behind by the US and other governments, “they can ensure vital work can continue.” In the past year, Bloomberg Philanthropies has stepped in to cover the US’s funding for the UN Climate convention, while the Skoll and MacArthur Foundations pledged to increase giving after the dismantlement of USAID. Philanthropies are in a unique position to drive progress on clean air. These groups have the flexibility to take greater risks and fund early-stage innovations, pilots, and advocacy campaigns, the report notes – all without the debt burden typically associated with official government-given development assistance. Philanthropies also provide leadership in the political space through lending evidence, raising awareness of air pollution risks, and lobbying. “While philanthropies cannot fill the entire finance gap on their own, we’ve seen the hugely impactful domino effect they create,” said CAF CEO Jane Burston. “Their investments [accelerate] public policy and catalysing public and private finance.” Most of these projects fall under policy and awareness efforts, though the report highlights the need for technical projects like monitoring. Philanthropies have catalyzed change in the air pollution space for decades. In 2002, the Sierra Club launched its Beyond Coal Campaign, one of the most “extensive, effective, and long-lasting campaigns in the history of the environmental movement.” The campaign has advocated shifting away from coal to more renewable sources. Funding needed for other polluting sectors Young people trained by the Green African Youth Organization (GAYO) in Ghana, sort and divert waste from being burned. Philanthropic funding has primarily focused on the transportation sector, with 61% of funding supporting projects such as bus electrification or protecting pedestrian walkways away from busy roads. Other polluting sectors received a far smaller share of funding, notably the energy sector, agriculture, and the waste management sector. “Diversifying investments across sectors can help address several sources of emissions that significantly affect both health and climate outcomes,” the report argues. The waste management sector in particular could greatly benefit from addressing open air burning of solid waste and reducing methane and black carbon emissions. Burning waste generates toxic plumes of dioxins, furans, and heavy metals. More recent research has also pointed to the practice for releasing microplastics into the air. Several grassroots organizations, like the Green African Youth Organization (GAYO) in Ghana, Botswana, and Uganda, have projects that aim to reduce open-air burning and deploy air quality sensors to track open-burning hotspots. GAYO’s anti-incineration and no-burn campaign has trained more than 100 municipal officers and environmental health workers in community-level enforcement and education across Ghana. Their Zero Waste Cities initiative in Accra has recovered 50 to 75 tonnes of waste per month, diverting materials from both landfills and open burning. Engaging in these sectors beyond transportation – like in clean cooking and agricultural practices such as moving away from crop residue burning –“will be critical for improving public health, reducing inequality, and accelerating progress towards cleaner air and a more sustainable future,” the report argues. A call to increase philanthropic giving Waste workers join protest over air pollution exposure in Delhi. In the past several years, the rate of growth in philanthropic funding in clean air has slowed. While the raw numbers of funds invested have more than doubled between 2019 and 2023, reaching a total of $478 million, philanthropic funding for outdoor air quality is showing “signs of stagnation,” the report warns. Between 2022 and 2023, funding grew by only 2%, from $123.1 million to $125.8 million, the report says. Image Credits: Igor Karimov/ Unsplash, University of Chicago , IQAir, Clean Air Fund , Sierra Club, Clean Air Fund. Microplastics: Brain Study Confirms Health Risks, Challenges Kennedy’s Claims 20/04/2026 Felix Sassmannshausen & Sophia Samantaroy A new study reveals how microplastics are infiltrating human brain tissue. A joint announcement by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Health and Human Services (HHS) on microplastics made inaccurate claims about how many plastic particles exist in the brain, while providing an unclear regulatory plan to address this. But a study published in Nature Health found microplastics in nearly every one of its 191 human brain samples. US Health Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr hailed a federal proposal by the EPA to track microplastics contamination in drinking water earlier this month as “a turning point” in the effort to confront microplastics that have “become embedded in modern life.” Kennedy, the leading figure of the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement claimed that there is roughly a “spoonful of plastic in every human brain,” but a newly published study in the journal Nature Health challenges this alarming statistic – while also finding a proliferation of plastic in human brains. The mainly Chinese and US-affiliated researchers analysed 191 brain tissue samples collected across China, using advanced techniques, including laser direct infrared spectroscopy (LDIR) and pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS), to detect micro- and nanoplastics. They found that human brains actually average 50.3 micrograms per gram of healthy tissue, suggesting actual exposure levels are nearly 100 times – or two orders of magnitude – lower than a contested older study cited by Kennedy. Despite this significantly lower concentration, the new findings notably confirm the presence of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) in 100% of the healthy post-mortem brains analysed and in 99.4% of diseased brains. “This study provides evidence of MNP presence in the living human brain, highlighting a need for further research to understand causal links between MNPs and human disease,” Runting Li and colleagues wrote in the publication released on Monday. The toxic legacy of plastic additives This diagram from the Nature Health study maps the presence of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) in the diseased human brain, detailing median concentrations The threat of micro- and nanoplastics contamination in the brain tissue raises significant concern as they can penetrate the blood-brain barrier, where they are subsequently engulfed by the brain’s immune cells, known as microglia. Because these synthetic particles cannot be biologically degraded, they accumulate within the tissue and can trigger severe oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and chronic neuroinflammation. Furthermore, clinical data from patients with brain cancer reveal a concerning correlation regarding tumour progression. The Nature Health researchers found that a larger microplastic surface area within the tissue was positively associated with faster tumour growth and proliferation. The danger extends beyond the physical particles to the thousands of chemical additives used during manufacturing, such as bisphenols and phthalates, which are known endocrine disruptors linked to a host of chronic diseases. Additionally, the degrading particles act as highly effective carriers for other environmental pollutants, absorbing heavy metals, pesticides, and even viruses to carry these dangerous hitchhikers directly into the human bloodstream. This combined chemical and physical burden drives severe health outcomes. Clinical studies indicate that patients with detectable microplastic contamination in their arterial plaque face a 4.5-fold higher risk of suffering a heart attack, stroke, or death within three years. Validating urgent research needs Experts analysing the new study voiced concerns over potential false positives and laboratory contamination. However, the new study, which was evaluated by independent experts, also faces criticism. Scientists raised concerns about methodological flaws, warning that the imaging techniques likely produced false positives by mistaking human proteins for polyamide and human fats for polyethylene, the world’s most common plastic. In a statement to press evaluating the research, Dr Dieter Fischer, head of the microplastics working group at the Leibniz Institute of Polymer Research in Dresden, Germany, argued it is highly unlikely that the identified particles actually originated from the human tissue samples. He suggested the results are likely to be skewed by laboratory contamination and the fundamental difficulty of distinguishing plastics from natural human hydrocarbons. Conversely, other experts not involved in the study praised the researchers for utilising multiple analytical methods, noting that this dual approach makes the findings significantly more robust than previous research. Dr Martin Wagner, head of the bioanalytical toxicology lab at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, concluded that these new metrics regarding the presence and quantity of microplastics in the brain are much more dependable than prior estimates. Furthermore, neuro-oncology experts stress that the higher plastic concentrations found near brain tumours are merely an association, as aggressive tumours actively destroy the blood-brain barrier to allow external particles to passively accumulate. The Nature Health authors acknowledge this unproven causal relationship, warning that their findings should be interpreted with caution to avoid unnecessary public alarm. Standardising microplastics contamination research Despite efforts to define nanoplastics, there is still no standardised protocol for detection. This warning underscores the necessity of further research and standardisation, as the absence of unified detection and reporting protocols makes it very difficult to compare data across studies and reliably estimate human exposure levels. While studies generally describe microplastics as fragments ranging from one micrometre to five millimetres and nanoplastics as an even smaller subfraction measuring under one micrometre, these smallest particles are frequently neglected in research due to current methodological limitations. “The laboratory methods to study micro- and nanoparticles and their health effects are still evolving,” Dr Rebecca Florsheim, a research physician at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine, noted in a statement to the American Lung Association last month. Recognising that current scientific methods remain limited, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) launched a $144 million initiative called the Systematic Targeting of Microplastics (STOMP)nearlier this month. Led by the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), the programme aims to build gold-standard clinical tests to accurately measure, map and ultimately remove microplastics contamination from the human body. Overlooking exposure routes Experts warn that focusing solely on water may overlook other critical pathways for microplastic exposure, including through inhalation and eating processed foods. While public health experts expressed support for the EPA’s proposal to add microplastics and pharmaceuticals to the draft Sixth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 6) for public drinking water, they warn that the focus on water and attempts to “eliminate microplastics from the human body” are too narrow. The CCL6/CCL does not actually regulate America’s public drinking water but signals that a contaminant “warrants serious scientific attention and may be considered for future regulatory action,” the agency noted. Other experts worry that this focus could lead to different critical exposure routes being overlooked. Environmental groups have urged agencies to prioritise the reduction of synthetic textiles, as these fabrics continuously shed microfibers that contaminate indoor air and are inhaled, and also easily bypass wastewater filtration systems. In addition, research by Dr Samantha Romanick, a scientist at the nonprofit Environmental Working Group (EWG), shows that ultra-processed foods typically contain higher plastic levels than less processed alternatives. This contamination largely occurs during industrial manufacturing, as ingredients undergo multiple processing stages and are continually exposed to shedding plastic from conveyor belts, tubes, and packaging. Furthermore, researchers behind the recent brain study discovered that routine surgical equipment, including plastic syringes and intravenous infusion sets, actively sheds microplastics directly into vulnerable patients. They calculated that a single surgical operation could introduce over 30,000 microplastics directly into the bloodstream, bypassing the gut and lungs entirely. “With the widespread use of plastic-based medical devices, MNP contamination in clinical environments is probably unavoidable,” Runting Li and colleagues warned in their Nature Health paper. They stressed that this direct exposure pathway demands global attention and the urgent establishment of stringent quality-control standards within the healthcare industry. The world’s burden of plastic ingestion Global human consumption of microplastics has now grown to six times the rate in 1990. The scale of global exposure extends far beyond the borders of the United States, as human consumption of microplastics has grown to six times the rate recorded in 1990. This burden falls disproportionately on Southeast Asia, which experiences some of the world’s highest microplastic ingestion rates due to severe contamination within its seafood-rich diets. Advocates claim that addressing this crisis requires shifting the focus away from individual consumer choices or speculative human treatment, and toward stringent corporate accountability and the absolute reduction of plastic use and water regulation. To this end, the global community is looking toward the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on Plastic Pollution, which aims to develop a legally binding international treaty. However, progress on the treaty remains slow as major plastic-producing nations, including the US, strongly oppose limits on plastic production. “While we did not land the treaty text we hoped for, we at UNEP will continue the work against plastic pollution,” said Inger Andersen, executive director of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) at the close of last year’s negotiations. “Pollution that is in our groundwater, in our soil, in our rivers, in our oceans and yes, in our bodies.” Image Credits: European Union, Nature Health, Felix Sassmannshausen/HPW, Andreas Mattern/UFZ via EU Commission, Taichi Nakamura via Unsplash. Bangladesh Tightens Control Over Tobacco But Excludes Smokeless Products 20/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan Around a quarter of Bangladeshi men smoke, which has major health impacts. Bangladesh’s new government has approved a wide-ranging anti-tobacco law that bans advertising, promotion and display across print, electronic, digital and social media, entertainment platforms and points of sale. The Smoking and Tobacco Usage (Control) (Amendment) Law, 2025 also prohibits corporate social responsibility initiatives from using tobacco brand names, logos or trademarks. Cigarette packs have to carry pictorial health warnings covering at least 75% of their surface and include the contact numbers of the national quit line. It also expands smoke-free public places and bans the sale and use of tobacco products within 100 meters of schools, hospitals, clinics and playgrounds. This is one of the first laws passed by the government of Prime Minister Tarique Rahman, who was sworn in last month after winning elections in February. Rahman’s Bangladesh National Party took over from an interim administration installed after an uprising in 2024 removed Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and her Awami League from power. the country has a high prevalence of tobacco use, with an estimated 25% of men in Bangladesh smoking – over 21 million. In 2023, around a quarter of deaths among men and 10% of women’s deaths were caused by tobacco – almost 200,000 people in total, according to the Tobacco Atlas. In addition to the substantial health burden, the annual cost of illness attributable to smoking in Bangladesh is estimated to be 730.63 billion takas (approximately US$5.9 billion). Vapes excluded The law does not cover newer tobacco and nicotine products, including vapes, heated tobacco products, electronic nicotine delivery systems and nicotine pouches. This is despite almost 25% of people using smokeless tobacco products, according to the Tobacco Atlas. Welcoming the law, Gan Quan, Vital Strategies’ senior vice president for tobacco control, urged its quick implementation. “This is a positive step, setting the stage to save millions of lives and deliver economic gains, so we must seize this moment with continued collaboration among government agencies, civil society and public health partners, and continuing public education about the harms caused by tobacco,” he said. “Together, we must remain vigilant against the industry’s attempts to subvert or delay these measures and further strengthen policy to address the regulation of emerging tobacco and nicotine products. There is an urgent need to protect youth in particular from being targeted with these products.” Smita Baruah, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids executive vice-president, said that the new measures “will drive down rates of tobacco use, save lives and protect kids from addiction to tobacco.” “Tobacco companies know that strong tobacco control laws work to stop people from smoking and prevent young people from starting to smoke, so they do everything in their power to undermine lifesaving laws like this. It is crucial that these measures be protected from the interests of the world’s largest tobacco companies,” she added. Image Credits: Simon Reza/ Unsplash. Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Include Access to Safe Abortion Services 20/04/2026 Maggie De Block Although the World Health Organization (WHO) recognises comprehensive abortion care as an essential health service, countries all over the world are tightening access, inspired by the United States. But all this means is worse outcomes for women’s health There is a persistent myth that restricting abortion stops it from happening. What restrictions really do – predictably and tragically – is make abortion unsafe. The WHO reports that around 73 million abortions occur worldwide each year, of which – remarkably – 45% are unsafe. The 2017 WHO–Guttmacher report found that 97% of unsafe abortions occurred in developing countries, particularly in Africa, Asia and Latin America, and WHO’s 2022 abortion care guideline notes that around seven million women in developing countries are treated for complications of unsafe abortion every year. Those are only the women who make it to care. Many do not. A preventable cause of maternal mortality The mortality gap between safe and unsafe abortion is stark. In settings where abortion is safe and legal, deaths are rare; where it is unsafe, the risks rise dramatically because the procedure is carried out by unskilled people or in environments that do not meet minimum medical standards, or both. Maternal deaths due to unsafe abortion are often misclassified and under-reported. A review encompassing the period 2009–20 found that 8% of maternal deaths globally were linked to abortion. In low- and middle-income countries, the impact of unsafe abortion is compounded by weak primary care systems, provider shortages, long travel distances, punitive laws, and stigma. The result is delay, secrecy, shame, and complications that could have been prevented. Put simply: when states fail to provide access to safe care, women do not stop seeking abortions. Rather, they are placed in unnecessary danger, with serious health, social and economic consequences. Safe abortion is a basic human right Access to safe abortion is grounded in international human rights law, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. In Africa, the Maputo Protocol provides an especially important regional anchor for women’s reproductive rights. Many human rights bodies and mechanisms agree that lack of access to quality abortion care risks violating the rights of women and girls, including the right to life; the right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health; the right to benefit from scientific progress and its realisation; the right to decide freely and responsibly on the number, spacing and timing of children; rights to privacy and to freedom from discrimination, and the right to be free from torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment. Human rights bodies have also noted that restrictions on access to abortion affect some women disproportionately. The UN Working Group on Discrimination Against Women in Law and in Practice has observed that “in countries where induced termination of pregnancy is restricted by law and/or otherwise unavailable, safe termination of pregnancy is a privilege of the rich, while women with limited resources have little choice but to resort to unsafe providers.” The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women has expressed particular concern that “rural women are more likely to resort to unsafe abortion than their urban counterparts”. The same is true for adolescents, who frequently lack information. The Committee on the Rights of the Child has urged States “to decriminalise abortion to ensure that girls have access to safe abortion and postabortion services, review legislation with a view to guaranteeing the best interests of pregnant adolescents and ensure that their views are always heard and respected in abortion-related decisions.” Comprehensive abortion care is more than medicines The practical case for ensuring access to abortion services is also strong because the tools already exist. WHO’s 2023 clinical guidance and self-care recommendations recognise medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol as a safe and effective option, and these medicines are included on the WHO Essential Medicines List. The WHO guideline also states that medical abortion can be self-managed using mifepristone plus misoprostol or misoprostol alone where people have accurate information and access to a trained health worker if needed. In resource-constrained settings, that matters enormously. Medication abortion can reduce dependence on scarce specialist infrastructure, make earlier care more feasible, and expand access to rural and other underserved women. But medicines alone are not enough. Women also need quality-assured products, clear information, referral pathways, pain management, and emergency backup if needed. A tablet without a system to support its use is not access. Comprehensive abortion care also includes contraception, counselling and information, timely diagnosis, medical or surgical abortion where appropriate, and post-abortion care for complications after miscarriage or unsafe abortion. Post-abortion care is not an optional extra. Abortion access is shaped by many other policies and practices: access to contraception, laws on marital consent, approaches to gender-based violence, access to adoption services, affordability, provider bias, supply chains, transport, privacy and digital information, religious views, and whether women trust the health system enough to use it. If someone must travel for hours, pay out of pocket, or be shamed and harassed for seeking care, she does not have real access. What governments and donors must do: Reform laws and regulations that criminalise or unduly restrict abortion care. Criminalisation of abortion must end. Punitive laws on women and service providers drive delay, secrecy and unsafe methods. Make mifepristone and misoprostol reliably available and affordable. Registration, procurement, quality assurance and distribution are essential policy choices. Integrate abortion into primary health care and universal health coverage packages. Abortion should not be separate from routine sexual, reproductive and maternal health services. Expand provider training and task-sharing. WHO guidance supports community service models, which are crucial in workforce-constrained settings. Guarantee access to post-abortion care. Even in restrictive settings, treating complications is an absolute minimum standard. Invest in information, privacy and building trust. Women need accurate information and safe pathways into care, with compassion, and without stigma. The choice is political The impact of unsafe abortion on maternal mortality is indisputable. The medicines and standards of care for safe abortion are well established. The rights framework is clear. What remains is a political choice – whether governments, donors and multilateral institutions will treat safe abortion as basic health care or continue to support a hierarchy in which women suffer indignity and die of preventable causes while others pass judgement. Above all, let’s start from this simple premise: women and girls are not vessels for state or religious ideology. They are rights-holders. If governments are serious about realising the right to health and reducing maternal mortality, then safe abortion access must be part of the plan – explicitly, urgently, and at scale. Maggie De Block served as Belgium’s Minister of Social Affairs and Health from 2014 to 2020. She is a medical doctor and a member of the Belgian Chamber of Representatives. Image Credits: Center for Reproductive Rights. ‘A Unique Moment’: New Regional Air Pollution Plans Aim to Cut Health Burden Across Latin America 17/04/2026 Sophia Samantaroy Medellin, Colombia’s second largest city, is located in the northern Andes, where smog becomes trapped through meteorological temperature inversions. The Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO) will soon unveil a new Roadmap on Air Quality and Health, following on from a meeting with countries and other stakeholders in February in Mexico. The PAHO strategy dovetails with an ambitious new regional action plan by the UN Environment Programme – which supports the work of environment ministries. While the high mountains of the Andes might be associated in popular imagination with crystal clear air, in fact, these 4000+ meter high mountains also trap air pollution, smothering cities nestled in their towering ranges. It is visual testimony to the health impacts of an air pollution problem that kills some 370,000 people annually across Latin America and the Caribbean. But Latin American and Caribbean countries are at a “unique moment” in terms of opportunities to improve air quality, marking a critical pivot toward treating air pollution not merely as an environmental byproduct, but as a top-tier public health emergency, according to Juan J Castillo who leads the air quality team at PAHO, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) regional office for the Americas. “We see this action plan as an opportunity to send a strong message to the region, to the ministers of health and the environment, that there is a clear case for health in improving air quality,” said Juan Castillo. His team has been leading the plan’s development while also working to bolster collaboration across Latin America, connecting ministries of the environment and health, and closing the air pollution monitoring gap. Meeting the WHO goal to halve deaths from air pollution by 2040 Latin American cities are already taking climate adaptation measures, like Barranquilla, shown here. But air pollution experts highlight the health benefits of green urban desgin. The action plan comes a year after the World Health Organization’s second conference on Air pollution and health, hosted in Cartagena, Colombia. A core aim of the plan is to create a pathway for meeting the WHO target set out at the Cartagena meeting of halving deaths from air pollution by 2040. At the conference, some 20 countries, including many from the Latin American region, made related pledges. But the action plan aims to mainstream the goal into the plans of health ministries. Over 700 stakeholders gathered in Cartagena, Colombia, for the 2nd WHO Air Pollution and Health in 2025. “This is truly a pivotal point,” Castillo said. “Latin America requires solutions that respond to the specific needs of the region. This is why it is charting its own path towards cleaner air- and one that could inspire other lower- and middle-income nations, fostering further South-South cooperation.” Latin America and the Caribbean already have cleaner air, on average, than hot spots like South East Asia, there is still a long way to go to achieve the World Health Organization quality goals. Some cities in the region actually meet WHO air quality guidelines for particulate matter (PM2.5) and others exceed them “only” by one to two times. However, a number of cities in Chile, Brazil, Bolivia and Peru, have average annual PM2.5 concentrations reaching 3-5 times above WHO guidelines, according to the 2025 report of the Swiss-based monitoring firm, IQ-Air. Lima, Peru is one noteworthy example. The health argument for cleaner skies Local authorities in Lima, Peru promote cycling as part of a sustainable mobility effort. “The evidence shows that there is a huge burden of disease linked to air pollution in the region,” said Castillo. “Air pollution is one of the leading causes of non-communicable diseases and also for all kinds of morbidity, such as asthma attacks, respiratory infections and impaired cognitive development. So we’re focused on using the evidence to help countries make the best decision to achieve their public health goals.” Many countries in Latin America have implemented steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but these climate policies often neglect to consider the health benefits of tackling climate pollutants. These health impact assessments of climate mitigation are crucial and are included in the Organization’s Air Quality and Health Plan for Latin America and the Caribbean, said Castillo. “We need to understand the health gains to bolster the argument for environmental policies and to help with the strategic importance of these policies.” Integrating air quality action on climate change “can be particularly beneficial, as it broadens access to funding and delivers greater public health benefits,” notes a December 2025 regional action strategy by the UNEP-hosted Climate and Clean Air Coalition. Action needed beyond the health sector An all-electric bus in Brasilia is one of many rolled out across Latin America. The CCAC strategy is targeted to ministries of the environment, while the PAHO roadmap focuses on ministries of health. But the two aim to work in tandem to build political will for systemic changes that reduce air pollution. Such changes typically require action on finance, transport, building and household energy systems, urban design and waste management – well beyond the traditional domain of health ministries. In terms of transport, a major air pollution factor, Latin America historically has had stronger public transport systems than many other developing regions, and cities such as Curitiba and Bogota became pioneers in developing Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) as well as cycle networks, which helped reduce emissions from private automobiles. Baranquilla has pioneered several clean transport initiatives, such as electric buses, as shown in a Transformative Urban Mobility Initiative brochure. But too often, BRT systems in the region have remained too dependent on dirty diesel – where cleaner electric systems are needed to really clean up the air further. Now, there is a move to electrify BRT systems in key Latin American cities such as Brasilia, Brazil and Barranquilla, Colombia, supported partly by German development assistance as well as local initiatives. Barranquilla, Colombia, has undergone a massive urban renewal effort with the aim of shifting to a 50% electric bus fleet by 2034. Public transport is being integrated with cycle networks and pedestrian-friendly streets – about 30% of travel is on foot – supporting healthier, more active, and low-emissions mobility. PAHO hopes that more cities can see the health benefits of urban design – and use climate funding for greener cities that foster public health. Closing the monitoring and data gap The new PAHO roadmap advocates for better air quality monitoring to better inform policymakers. Tracking air quality progress has been a challenge for the region. Less than 40% of countries have a government standard for chronic exposure to the most dangerous form of particulate pollution, PM2.5. Without these standards, governments cannot chart further regulation to clean up polluted skies. The region has also struggled with tracking air quality. Only a third of cities in the region have active reference monitoring stations- or local inventories of criteria pollutant emissions, active air management programs, or government-published health impact assessments, according to the most recent regional action plan. And only seven cities have air quality forecasting systems. The data that is available raises several concerns. Of the 58 cities with PM2.5 data, only one city complies with the WHO guideline values. The region of Latin America and the Caribbean has, on average, enjoys cleaner air than South Asia or the African continent. Much of the poorer air quality is in urban centers and the Andean region. “Many cities lack key tools, or those that exist are not operational, up to date, or in use, while their populations remain exposed to harmful pollution levels,” says CCAC in its 2025 regional strategy. A consortium of South American researchers echoed that, in a 2025 review that stated: “South America would greatly benefit from expanded monitoring networks, improved air quality modeling, and detailed health data to better understand exposure–health relationships and multipollutant interactions.” Grassroots organizers like Ana Badillo, a co-founder of the Ecuador-based advocacy group Pacha Ayllu, have also championed access to real-time air quality data through the expanded use by “citizen-scientists” of low-cost air pollution sensors in the capital city of Quito. “This citizen-led monitoring network is designed to empower individuals and communities to better understand the quality of the air they breathe and make informed decisions to protect their health and that of their loved ones,” said Badillo in a recent post. The democratization of data is also central to the new CCAC strategy, which is promoting its AQMx Platform, a digital hub designed to support air quality management exchange and integrate conventional air quality monitoring with low-cost sensor networks, relying more on civil society groups like Pacha Ayllu. Collaborating across sectors At COP30 in Belém in 2025, Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus signaled a historic shift by formalizing the Belém Health Action Plan, highlighting the urgency of climate action for health. With funding an “obvious” challenge for cleaning up Latin America’s air, PAHO and its partners have emphasized the health gains of environmental interventions to help governments understand the strategic importance of such changes. In relation to that, collaboration across the energy and environmental sectors is key, says Castillo, whose office is also working closely with the UNEP-hosted CCAC. Tapping into energy sector investments also means cleaner, more affordable, and reliable energy. The new CCAC strategy targets not only air pollution, but a “triple planetary crisis” – climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution – by focusing on the reduction of “super pollutants” like black carbon and methane a precursor of ground level ozone (O3), as well as a powerful climate pollutant. But black carbon and methane do not remain long in the atmosphere, reductions can yield rapid gains for health as well as climate. By making air quality projects “bankable” for multilateral giants like the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), the plan seeks to move beyond sporadic grants toward a flexible financing architecture that includes green bonds and blended finance. Mexico City: a story of success A combination of Mexico City’s high population, geography, and occasional wildfires have made clean air a challenge for decades. Castillo pointed to the example of Mexico City, which once had some of the most polluted air in the Americas, or even the world, as a story of success. It was grassroots organizations that agitated for clean air protections. “They demanded action,” Castillo said. “And many other places are following suit.” Mexico City has developed a robust air quality monitoring system, NowCast – and one of the most ambitious goals for reducing short-lived climate pollutants in the region. “It has helped enormously in terms of health protection, because we can now warn people much sooner, telling them not to go outside, not to exercise outdoors and to avoid inhaling highly polluted air,” said Sergio Zirath, Mexico’s director general of Industry, Clean Energy and Air Quality Management in an interview with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Mexico has now stepped in to provide technical advice to other countries across the region on clean air solutions. Although this is an effort being led by PAHO, an organization that also includes Canada and the United States, by definition as a strategy for Latin America and the Caribbean, neither are part of this new strategy. “PAHO respects every country’s decision on how they want to manage their policy. Our focus is based on evidence, action and available data,” said Castillo, when asked about the absence of the US from regional clean air activities since the Trump administration took over in January 2025. But in the end, Castillo hopes this strategic plan – an undertaking that still includes 21 countries, civil society, and PAHO – will be more than “just another document.” Instead, he hopes it will provide countries with an opportunity to capitalize on changes already happening in the region – ones that might even clean up the air in the region’s worst-polluted cities suffering from smog buffered by the high Andes. Image Credits: Municipality of Bethlehem, S. Samantaroy/HPW, Partnerships for Health Cities, TUMI, IQAir, IQAir, WHO/PAHO/Karina Zambrana . From Vaccines to Racism: RFK Faces Barrage of Questions in House Committee 16/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan Representative Linda Sanchez (left) questioning Kennedy about the explosion of measles cases under his watch. Undermining vaccines, failing pregnant black women, threatening to remove black children with ADHD from their parents – these were some of the barrage of questions put to United States Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr when he appeared before the House Ways and Means Committee on Thursday. Kennedy was testifying about the Trump administration’s 2027 budget, which proposes to cut the HHS budget by 12,5% – including deep cuts for HIV programmes ($923 million less), maternal and child health ($561m), and mental health ($576m). The Trump 2027 budget also proposes to eliminate $4.3 billion from the US government’s global health budget, which falls under the US State Department. Massive measles increase There has been a 675% increase in measles cases since Kennedy was appointed in February last year, according to US Representative Linda Sanchez. “In 2024, under the Biden administration, there were 258 cases of measles. And in 2025, under your leadership at HHS, this ballooned to over 2,000 [cases]. That’s a 675% increase, and we are now on track to suppress to surpass that this year, with over 1,600 confirmed cases in just three and a half months,” said Sanchez. Pointing to the death last year of a six-year-old unvaccinated girl from measles, the first death of a US child from measles in a decade, Sanchez asked Kennedy whether a measles vaccine could have saved her life. “It’s possible,” Kennedy answered. Robert F Kennedy Jr testifying before the House Ways and Means Committee. Sanchez tore into Kennedy for orchestrating the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) decision to remove its “universal vaccine recommendations for children covering seven immunizations, including things like flu, covid, hepatitis A, hepatitis B and rotavirus.” She also quoted Kennedy’s claim on Fox News last year that the adverse effects from the measles vaccine “cause deaths every year… and causes all the illnesses that measles itself causes.” Sanchez said that “CDC data shows that about 80% of children who died from flu this season were not vaccinated, [and] the anti-vaccine rhetoric you ran on and the anti-vaccine actions you have taken over the last year clearly correlates with the dramatic increases in preventable diseases.” She asked Kennedy repeatedly whether Trump agreed with the CDC decision to “suspend public health messaging on vaccines last February” – but Kennedy dodged the question, claiming Sanchez has “a lot of misinformation”. Representative Mike Thompson said that Kennedy is “helping make diseases deadly again.” “Kids have died because measles is running rampant under your watch, in large part because President Trump allowed your conspiracy theories to run our public health,” said Thompson. Undermining health of black women “Black women are nearly three times more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than white women, yet the Trump administration is undermining black maternal health from all sides,” said Representative Danny Davis, a leader of the Congressional Black Caucus. He cited the Trump administration’s decision to cut $1 trillion from Medicaid, “which pays for 40% of births”, the proposed cuts to maternal and child care for 2027, and cuts to research. “DOGE [Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency] cancelled funds for several research projects that could save countless black mothers, like the Morehouse School of Medicine research on improving the health of black pregnant and postpartum women,” said Davis. “How can we lower black maternal health experiences if we’re cutting funds for these critical programmes, and the administration is saying that you can’t consider race or ethnicity in healthcare?” In response, Kennedy claimed that there had been “tremendous duplication” in programmes and “we are investing huge amounts of money in maternal health.” The US has the highest maternal mortality rate in the developed world. ‘Reparenting’ black children? Representative Terri Sewell (centre) raised Kennedy’s comments that black children on ADHD medication should be “reparented” Describing various comments made by Kennedy as “outlandish and frankly disturbing”, Representative Terri Sewell took issue with his stating during a podcast interview that black children on ADHD medication should be “reparented”. “You said every black kid is now just standardly put on Adderall, SSRIs, benzos, which are known to induce violence, and that those children are going to have to go somewhere to get reparented,” said Sewell, reminding Kennedy that there was a long history of black children being removed from their parents, dating back to slavery. Despite Kennedy’s comments being recorded, he denied making them and said he “doesn’t even know what reparenting means”. Budget chief under pressure Meanwhile, health activists interrupted the testimony of Russell Vought, head of the US Office of Management and Budget (OMB), before the House Budget Committee on Wednesday. Minutes after Vought began his opening statement on the 2027 budget proposal, protesters tood up, holding up posters and shouting slogans accusing the Trump administration of killing people with HIV, and urging the administration to spend the funds Congress has allocated to the US President’s Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (PEPFAR). ”Russell Vought is directly responsible for illegally withholding Congressionally appropriated funds for PEPFAR and related global health initiatives. These funding disruptions have already contributed to preventable deaths and threaten to reverse decades of progress in the fight against HIV worldwide,” said Charles King, CEO of Housing Works, in a statement from the protestors issued by Health Gap. They accuse Vought of “blatant defiance of the will of Congress, which has fully funded PEPFAR programs for FY25 and FY26 over Vought’s objections, including by rejecting $400 million in rescission of PEPFAR funding in 2025.” “The FY27 President’s budget request for HIV and global health would eliminate HIV-specific and all disease-specific programming, while slashing overall global health funding by 46% compared with FY26 levels ($9.4 billion in FY26; $5.4 billion proposed in FY27 the President’s budget request),” according to the statement. “In addition to proposing deadly funding cuts, the FY27 budget request also disparages scientific evidence in global health, particularly regarding highly effective methods of HIV prevention, suggesting elimination of funding for condoms and programs for LGBTQ+ people, who face disproportionately high HIV risk of HIV infection due to criminalization and stigma,” according to the statement. Vought also recently diverted $15 million in USAID funding aimed at lifesaving humanitarian assistance to pay for his personal security, according to Reuters. Vought, former vice-president of the right-wing think tank Heritage Foundation, co-authored Project 2025, the conservative blueprint for governance being followed by the Trump administration. Posts navigation Older posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Microplastics: Brain Study Confirms Health Risks, Challenges Kennedy’s Claims 20/04/2026 Felix Sassmannshausen & Sophia Samantaroy A new study reveals how microplastics are infiltrating human brain tissue. A joint announcement by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Health and Human Services (HHS) on microplastics made inaccurate claims about how many plastic particles exist in the brain, while providing an unclear regulatory plan to address this. But a study published in Nature Health found microplastics in nearly every one of its 191 human brain samples. US Health Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr hailed a federal proposal by the EPA to track microplastics contamination in drinking water earlier this month as “a turning point” in the effort to confront microplastics that have “become embedded in modern life.” Kennedy, the leading figure of the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement claimed that there is roughly a “spoonful of plastic in every human brain,” but a newly published study in the journal Nature Health challenges this alarming statistic – while also finding a proliferation of plastic in human brains. The mainly Chinese and US-affiliated researchers analysed 191 brain tissue samples collected across China, using advanced techniques, including laser direct infrared spectroscopy (LDIR) and pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS), to detect micro- and nanoplastics. They found that human brains actually average 50.3 micrograms per gram of healthy tissue, suggesting actual exposure levels are nearly 100 times – or two orders of magnitude – lower than a contested older study cited by Kennedy. Despite this significantly lower concentration, the new findings notably confirm the presence of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) in 100% of the healthy post-mortem brains analysed and in 99.4% of diseased brains. “This study provides evidence of MNP presence in the living human brain, highlighting a need for further research to understand causal links between MNPs and human disease,” Runting Li and colleagues wrote in the publication released on Monday. The toxic legacy of plastic additives This diagram from the Nature Health study maps the presence of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) in the diseased human brain, detailing median concentrations The threat of micro- and nanoplastics contamination in the brain tissue raises significant concern as they can penetrate the blood-brain barrier, where they are subsequently engulfed by the brain’s immune cells, known as microglia. Because these synthetic particles cannot be biologically degraded, they accumulate within the tissue and can trigger severe oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and chronic neuroinflammation. Furthermore, clinical data from patients with brain cancer reveal a concerning correlation regarding tumour progression. The Nature Health researchers found that a larger microplastic surface area within the tissue was positively associated with faster tumour growth and proliferation. The danger extends beyond the physical particles to the thousands of chemical additives used during manufacturing, such as bisphenols and phthalates, which are known endocrine disruptors linked to a host of chronic diseases. Additionally, the degrading particles act as highly effective carriers for other environmental pollutants, absorbing heavy metals, pesticides, and even viruses to carry these dangerous hitchhikers directly into the human bloodstream. This combined chemical and physical burden drives severe health outcomes. Clinical studies indicate that patients with detectable microplastic contamination in their arterial plaque face a 4.5-fold higher risk of suffering a heart attack, stroke, or death within three years. Validating urgent research needs Experts analysing the new study voiced concerns over potential false positives and laboratory contamination. However, the new study, which was evaluated by independent experts, also faces criticism. Scientists raised concerns about methodological flaws, warning that the imaging techniques likely produced false positives by mistaking human proteins for polyamide and human fats for polyethylene, the world’s most common plastic. In a statement to press evaluating the research, Dr Dieter Fischer, head of the microplastics working group at the Leibniz Institute of Polymer Research in Dresden, Germany, argued it is highly unlikely that the identified particles actually originated from the human tissue samples. He suggested the results are likely to be skewed by laboratory contamination and the fundamental difficulty of distinguishing plastics from natural human hydrocarbons. Conversely, other experts not involved in the study praised the researchers for utilising multiple analytical methods, noting that this dual approach makes the findings significantly more robust than previous research. Dr Martin Wagner, head of the bioanalytical toxicology lab at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, concluded that these new metrics regarding the presence and quantity of microplastics in the brain are much more dependable than prior estimates. Furthermore, neuro-oncology experts stress that the higher plastic concentrations found near brain tumours are merely an association, as aggressive tumours actively destroy the blood-brain barrier to allow external particles to passively accumulate. The Nature Health authors acknowledge this unproven causal relationship, warning that their findings should be interpreted with caution to avoid unnecessary public alarm. Standardising microplastics contamination research Despite efforts to define nanoplastics, there is still no standardised protocol for detection. This warning underscores the necessity of further research and standardisation, as the absence of unified detection and reporting protocols makes it very difficult to compare data across studies and reliably estimate human exposure levels. While studies generally describe microplastics as fragments ranging from one micrometre to five millimetres and nanoplastics as an even smaller subfraction measuring under one micrometre, these smallest particles are frequently neglected in research due to current methodological limitations. “The laboratory methods to study micro- and nanoparticles and their health effects are still evolving,” Dr Rebecca Florsheim, a research physician at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine, noted in a statement to the American Lung Association last month. Recognising that current scientific methods remain limited, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) launched a $144 million initiative called the Systematic Targeting of Microplastics (STOMP)nearlier this month. Led by the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), the programme aims to build gold-standard clinical tests to accurately measure, map and ultimately remove microplastics contamination from the human body. Overlooking exposure routes Experts warn that focusing solely on water may overlook other critical pathways for microplastic exposure, including through inhalation and eating processed foods. While public health experts expressed support for the EPA’s proposal to add microplastics and pharmaceuticals to the draft Sixth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 6) for public drinking water, they warn that the focus on water and attempts to “eliminate microplastics from the human body” are too narrow. The CCL6/CCL does not actually regulate America’s public drinking water but signals that a contaminant “warrants serious scientific attention and may be considered for future regulatory action,” the agency noted. Other experts worry that this focus could lead to different critical exposure routes being overlooked. Environmental groups have urged agencies to prioritise the reduction of synthetic textiles, as these fabrics continuously shed microfibers that contaminate indoor air and are inhaled, and also easily bypass wastewater filtration systems. In addition, research by Dr Samantha Romanick, a scientist at the nonprofit Environmental Working Group (EWG), shows that ultra-processed foods typically contain higher plastic levels than less processed alternatives. This contamination largely occurs during industrial manufacturing, as ingredients undergo multiple processing stages and are continually exposed to shedding plastic from conveyor belts, tubes, and packaging. Furthermore, researchers behind the recent brain study discovered that routine surgical equipment, including plastic syringes and intravenous infusion sets, actively sheds microplastics directly into vulnerable patients. They calculated that a single surgical operation could introduce over 30,000 microplastics directly into the bloodstream, bypassing the gut and lungs entirely. “With the widespread use of plastic-based medical devices, MNP contamination in clinical environments is probably unavoidable,” Runting Li and colleagues warned in their Nature Health paper. They stressed that this direct exposure pathway demands global attention and the urgent establishment of stringent quality-control standards within the healthcare industry. The world’s burden of plastic ingestion Global human consumption of microplastics has now grown to six times the rate in 1990. The scale of global exposure extends far beyond the borders of the United States, as human consumption of microplastics has grown to six times the rate recorded in 1990. This burden falls disproportionately on Southeast Asia, which experiences some of the world’s highest microplastic ingestion rates due to severe contamination within its seafood-rich diets. Advocates claim that addressing this crisis requires shifting the focus away from individual consumer choices or speculative human treatment, and toward stringent corporate accountability and the absolute reduction of plastic use and water regulation. To this end, the global community is looking toward the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on Plastic Pollution, which aims to develop a legally binding international treaty. However, progress on the treaty remains slow as major plastic-producing nations, including the US, strongly oppose limits on plastic production. “While we did not land the treaty text we hoped for, we at UNEP will continue the work against plastic pollution,” said Inger Andersen, executive director of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) at the close of last year’s negotiations. “Pollution that is in our groundwater, in our soil, in our rivers, in our oceans and yes, in our bodies.” Image Credits: European Union, Nature Health, Felix Sassmannshausen/HPW, Andreas Mattern/UFZ via EU Commission, Taichi Nakamura via Unsplash. Bangladesh Tightens Control Over Tobacco But Excludes Smokeless Products 20/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan Around a quarter of Bangladeshi men smoke, which has major health impacts. Bangladesh’s new government has approved a wide-ranging anti-tobacco law that bans advertising, promotion and display across print, electronic, digital and social media, entertainment platforms and points of sale. The Smoking and Tobacco Usage (Control) (Amendment) Law, 2025 also prohibits corporate social responsibility initiatives from using tobacco brand names, logos or trademarks. Cigarette packs have to carry pictorial health warnings covering at least 75% of their surface and include the contact numbers of the national quit line. It also expands smoke-free public places and bans the sale and use of tobacco products within 100 meters of schools, hospitals, clinics and playgrounds. This is one of the first laws passed by the government of Prime Minister Tarique Rahman, who was sworn in last month after winning elections in February. Rahman’s Bangladesh National Party took over from an interim administration installed after an uprising in 2024 removed Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and her Awami League from power. the country has a high prevalence of tobacco use, with an estimated 25% of men in Bangladesh smoking – over 21 million. In 2023, around a quarter of deaths among men and 10% of women’s deaths were caused by tobacco – almost 200,000 people in total, according to the Tobacco Atlas. In addition to the substantial health burden, the annual cost of illness attributable to smoking in Bangladesh is estimated to be 730.63 billion takas (approximately US$5.9 billion). Vapes excluded The law does not cover newer tobacco and nicotine products, including vapes, heated tobacco products, electronic nicotine delivery systems and nicotine pouches. This is despite almost 25% of people using smokeless tobacco products, according to the Tobacco Atlas. Welcoming the law, Gan Quan, Vital Strategies’ senior vice president for tobacco control, urged its quick implementation. “This is a positive step, setting the stage to save millions of lives and deliver economic gains, so we must seize this moment with continued collaboration among government agencies, civil society and public health partners, and continuing public education about the harms caused by tobacco,” he said. “Together, we must remain vigilant against the industry’s attempts to subvert or delay these measures and further strengthen policy to address the regulation of emerging tobacco and nicotine products. There is an urgent need to protect youth in particular from being targeted with these products.” Smita Baruah, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids executive vice-president, said that the new measures “will drive down rates of tobacco use, save lives and protect kids from addiction to tobacco.” “Tobacco companies know that strong tobacco control laws work to stop people from smoking and prevent young people from starting to smoke, so they do everything in their power to undermine lifesaving laws like this. It is crucial that these measures be protected from the interests of the world’s largest tobacco companies,” she added. Image Credits: Simon Reza/ Unsplash. Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Include Access to Safe Abortion Services 20/04/2026 Maggie De Block Although the World Health Organization (WHO) recognises comprehensive abortion care as an essential health service, countries all over the world are tightening access, inspired by the United States. But all this means is worse outcomes for women’s health There is a persistent myth that restricting abortion stops it from happening. What restrictions really do – predictably and tragically – is make abortion unsafe. The WHO reports that around 73 million abortions occur worldwide each year, of which – remarkably – 45% are unsafe. The 2017 WHO–Guttmacher report found that 97% of unsafe abortions occurred in developing countries, particularly in Africa, Asia and Latin America, and WHO’s 2022 abortion care guideline notes that around seven million women in developing countries are treated for complications of unsafe abortion every year. Those are only the women who make it to care. Many do not. A preventable cause of maternal mortality The mortality gap between safe and unsafe abortion is stark. In settings where abortion is safe and legal, deaths are rare; where it is unsafe, the risks rise dramatically because the procedure is carried out by unskilled people or in environments that do not meet minimum medical standards, or both. Maternal deaths due to unsafe abortion are often misclassified and under-reported. A review encompassing the period 2009–20 found that 8% of maternal deaths globally were linked to abortion. In low- and middle-income countries, the impact of unsafe abortion is compounded by weak primary care systems, provider shortages, long travel distances, punitive laws, and stigma. The result is delay, secrecy, shame, and complications that could have been prevented. Put simply: when states fail to provide access to safe care, women do not stop seeking abortions. Rather, they are placed in unnecessary danger, with serious health, social and economic consequences. Safe abortion is a basic human right Access to safe abortion is grounded in international human rights law, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. In Africa, the Maputo Protocol provides an especially important regional anchor for women’s reproductive rights. Many human rights bodies and mechanisms agree that lack of access to quality abortion care risks violating the rights of women and girls, including the right to life; the right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health; the right to benefit from scientific progress and its realisation; the right to decide freely and responsibly on the number, spacing and timing of children; rights to privacy and to freedom from discrimination, and the right to be free from torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment. Human rights bodies have also noted that restrictions on access to abortion affect some women disproportionately. The UN Working Group on Discrimination Against Women in Law and in Practice has observed that “in countries where induced termination of pregnancy is restricted by law and/or otherwise unavailable, safe termination of pregnancy is a privilege of the rich, while women with limited resources have little choice but to resort to unsafe providers.” The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women has expressed particular concern that “rural women are more likely to resort to unsafe abortion than their urban counterparts”. The same is true for adolescents, who frequently lack information. The Committee on the Rights of the Child has urged States “to decriminalise abortion to ensure that girls have access to safe abortion and postabortion services, review legislation with a view to guaranteeing the best interests of pregnant adolescents and ensure that their views are always heard and respected in abortion-related decisions.” Comprehensive abortion care is more than medicines The practical case for ensuring access to abortion services is also strong because the tools already exist. WHO’s 2023 clinical guidance and self-care recommendations recognise medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol as a safe and effective option, and these medicines are included on the WHO Essential Medicines List. The WHO guideline also states that medical abortion can be self-managed using mifepristone plus misoprostol or misoprostol alone where people have accurate information and access to a trained health worker if needed. In resource-constrained settings, that matters enormously. Medication abortion can reduce dependence on scarce specialist infrastructure, make earlier care more feasible, and expand access to rural and other underserved women. But medicines alone are not enough. Women also need quality-assured products, clear information, referral pathways, pain management, and emergency backup if needed. A tablet without a system to support its use is not access. Comprehensive abortion care also includes contraception, counselling and information, timely diagnosis, medical or surgical abortion where appropriate, and post-abortion care for complications after miscarriage or unsafe abortion. Post-abortion care is not an optional extra. Abortion access is shaped by many other policies and practices: access to contraception, laws on marital consent, approaches to gender-based violence, access to adoption services, affordability, provider bias, supply chains, transport, privacy and digital information, religious views, and whether women trust the health system enough to use it. If someone must travel for hours, pay out of pocket, or be shamed and harassed for seeking care, she does not have real access. What governments and donors must do: Reform laws and regulations that criminalise or unduly restrict abortion care. Criminalisation of abortion must end. Punitive laws on women and service providers drive delay, secrecy and unsafe methods. Make mifepristone and misoprostol reliably available and affordable. Registration, procurement, quality assurance and distribution are essential policy choices. Integrate abortion into primary health care and universal health coverage packages. Abortion should not be separate from routine sexual, reproductive and maternal health services. Expand provider training and task-sharing. WHO guidance supports community service models, which are crucial in workforce-constrained settings. Guarantee access to post-abortion care. Even in restrictive settings, treating complications is an absolute minimum standard. Invest in information, privacy and building trust. Women need accurate information and safe pathways into care, with compassion, and without stigma. The choice is political The impact of unsafe abortion on maternal mortality is indisputable. The medicines and standards of care for safe abortion are well established. The rights framework is clear. What remains is a political choice – whether governments, donors and multilateral institutions will treat safe abortion as basic health care or continue to support a hierarchy in which women suffer indignity and die of preventable causes while others pass judgement. Above all, let’s start from this simple premise: women and girls are not vessels for state or religious ideology. They are rights-holders. If governments are serious about realising the right to health and reducing maternal mortality, then safe abortion access must be part of the plan – explicitly, urgently, and at scale. Maggie De Block served as Belgium’s Minister of Social Affairs and Health from 2014 to 2020. She is a medical doctor and a member of the Belgian Chamber of Representatives. Image Credits: Center for Reproductive Rights. ‘A Unique Moment’: New Regional Air Pollution Plans Aim to Cut Health Burden Across Latin America 17/04/2026 Sophia Samantaroy Medellin, Colombia’s second largest city, is located in the northern Andes, where smog becomes trapped through meteorological temperature inversions. The Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO) will soon unveil a new Roadmap on Air Quality and Health, following on from a meeting with countries and other stakeholders in February in Mexico. The PAHO strategy dovetails with an ambitious new regional action plan by the UN Environment Programme – which supports the work of environment ministries. While the high mountains of the Andes might be associated in popular imagination with crystal clear air, in fact, these 4000+ meter high mountains also trap air pollution, smothering cities nestled in their towering ranges. It is visual testimony to the health impacts of an air pollution problem that kills some 370,000 people annually across Latin America and the Caribbean. But Latin American and Caribbean countries are at a “unique moment” in terms of opportunities to improve air quality, marking a critical pivot toward treating air pollution not merely as an environmental byproduct, but as a top-tier public health emergency, according to Juan J Castillo who leads the air quality team at PAHO, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) regional office for the Americas. “We see this action plan as an opportunity to send a strong message to the region, to the ministers of health and the environment, that there is a clear case for health in improving air quality,” said Juan Castillo. His team has been leading the plan’s development while also working to bolster collaboration across Latin America, connecting ministries of the environment and health, and closing the air pollution monitoring gap. Meeting the WHO goal to halve deaths from air pollution by 2040 Latin American cities are already taking climate adaptation measures, like Barranquilla, shown here. But air pollution experts highlight the health benefits of green urban desgin. The action plan comes a year after the World Health Organization’s second conference on Air pollution and health, hosted in Cartagena, Colombia. A core aim of the plan is to create a pathway for meeting the WHO target set out at the Cartagena meeting of halving deaths from air pollution by 2040. At the conference, some 20 countries, including many from the Latin American region, made related pledges. But the action plan aims to mainstream the goal into the plans of health ministries. Over 700 stakeholders gathered in Cartagena, Colombia, for the 2nd WHO Air Pollution and Health in 2025. “This is truly a pivotal point,” Castillo said. “Latin America requires solutions that respond to the specific needs of the region. This is why it is charting its own path towards cleaner air- and one that could inspire other lower- and middle-income nations, fostering further South-South cooperation.” Latin America and the Caribbean already have cleaner air, on average, than hot spots like South East Asia, there is still a long way to go to achieve the World Health Organization quality goals. Some cities in the region actually meet WHO air quality guidelines for particulate matter (PM2.5) and others exceed them “only” by one to two times. However, a number of cities in Chile, Brazil, Bolivia and Peru, have average annual PM2.5 concentrations reaching 3-5 times above WHO guidelines, according to the 2025 report of the Swiss-based monitoring firm, IQ-Air. Lima, Peru is one noteworthy example. The health argument for cleaner skies Local authorities in Lima, Peru promote cycling as part of a sustainable mobility effort. “The evidence shows that there is a huge burden of disease linked to air pollution in the region,” said Castillo. “Air pollution is one of the leading causes of non-communicable diseases and also for all kinds of morbidity, such as asthma attacks, respiratory infections and impaired cognitive development. So we’re focused on using the evidence to help countries make the best decision to achieve their public health goals.” Many countries in Latin America have implemented steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but these climate policies often neglect to consider the health benefits of tackling climate pollutants. These health impact assessments of climate mitigation are crucial and are included in the Organization’s Air Quality and Health Plan for Latin America and the Caribbean, said Castillo. “We need to understand the health gains to bolster the argument for environmental policies and to help with the strategic importance of these policies.” Integrating air quality action on climate change “can be particularly beneficial, as it broadens access to funding and delivers greater public health benefits,” notes a December 2025 regional action strategy by the UNEP-hosted Climate and Clean Air Coalition. Action needed beyond the health sector An all-electric bus in Brasilia is one of many rolled out across Latin America. The CCAC strategy is targeted to ministries of the environment, while the PAHO roadmap focuses on ministries of health. But the two aim to work in tandem to build political will for systemic changes that reduce air pollution. Such changes typically require action on finance, transport, building and household energy systems, urban design and waste management – well beyond the traditional domain of health ministries. In terms of transport, a major air pollution factor, Latin America historically has had stronger public transport systems than many other developing regions, and cities such as Curitiba and Bogota became pioneers in developing Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) as well as cycle networks, which helped reduce emissions from private automobiles. Baranquilla has pioneered several clean transport initiatives, such as electric buses, as shown in a Transformative Urban Mobility Initiative brochure. But too often, BRT systems in the region have remained too dependent on dirty diesel – where cleaner electric systems are needed to really clean up the air further. Now, there is a move to electrify BRT systems in key Latin American cities such as Brasilia, Brazil and Barranquilla, Colombia, supported partly by German development assistance as well as local initiatives. Barranquilla, Colombia, has undergone a massive urban renewal effort with the aim of shifting to a 50% electric bus fleet by 2034. Public transport is being integrated with cycle networks and pedestrian-friendly streets – about 30% of travel is on foot – supporting healthier, more active, and low-emissions mobility. PAHO hopes that more cities can see the health benefits of urban design – and use climate funding for greener cities that foster public health. Closing the monitoring and data gap The new PAHO roadmap advocates for better air quality monitoring to better inform policymakers. Tracking air quality progress has been a challenge for the region. Less than 40% of countries have a government standard for chronic exposure to the most dangerous form of particulate pollution, PM2.5. Without these standards, governments cannot chart further regulation to clean up polluted skies. The region has also struggled with tracking air quality. Only a third of cities in the region have active reference monitoring stations- or local inventories of criteria pollutant emissions, active air management programs, or government-published health impact assessments, according to the most recent regional action plan. And only seven cities have air quality forecasting systems. The data that is available raises several concerns. Of the 58 cities with PM2.5 data, only one city complies with the WHO guideline values. The region of Latin America and the Caribbean has, on average, enjoys cleaner air than South Asia or the African continent. Much of the poorer air quality is in urban centers and the Andean region. “Many cities lack key tools, or those that exist are not operational, up to date, or in use, while their populations remain exposed to harmful pollution levels,” says CCAC in its 2025 regional strategy. A consortium of South American researchers echoed that, in a 2025 review that stated: “South America would greatly benefit from expanded monitoring networks, improved air quality modeling, and detailed health data to better understand exposure–health relationships and multipollutant interactions.” Grassroots organizers like Ana Badillo, a co-founder of the Ecuador-based advocacy group Pacha Ayllu, have also championed access to real-time air quality data through the expanded use by “citizen-scientists” of low-cost air pollution sensors in the capital city of Quito. “This citizen-led monitoring network is designed to empower individuals and communities to better understand the quality of the air they breathe and make informed decisions to protect their health and that of their loved ones,” said Badillo in a recent post. The democratization of data is also central to the new CCAC strategy, which is promoting its AQMx Platform, a digital hub designed to support air quality management exchange and integrate conventional air quality monitoring with low-cost sensor networks, relying more on civil society groups like Pacha Ayllu. Collaborating across sectors At COP30 in Belém in 2025, Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus signaled a historic shift by formalizing the Belém Health Action Plan, highlighting the urgency of climate action for health. With funding an “obvious” challenge for cleaning up Latin America’s air, PAHO and its partners have emphasized the health gains of environmental interventions to help governments understand the strategic importance of such changes. In relation to that, collaboration across the energy and environmental sectors is key, says Castillo, whose office is also working closely with the UNEP-hosted CCAC. Tapping into energy sector investments also means cleaner, more affordable, and reliable energy. The new CCAC strategy targets not only air pollution, but a “triple planetary crisis” – climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution – by focusing on the reduction of “super pollutants” like black carbon and methane a precursor of ground level ozone (O3), as well as a powerful climate pollutant. But black carbon and methane do not remain long in the atmosphere, reductions can yield rapid gains for health as well as climate. By making air quality projects “bankable” for multilateral giants like the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), the plan seeks to move beyond sporadic grants toward a flexible financing architecture that includes green bonds and blended finance. Mexico City: a story of success A combination of Mexico City’s high population, geography, and occasional wildfires have made clean air a challenge for decades. Castillo pointed to the example of Mexico City, which once had some of the most polluted air in the Americas, or even the world, as a story of success. It was grassroots organizations that agitated for clean air protections. “They demanded action,” Castillo said. “And many other places are following suit.” Mexico City has developed a robust air quality monitoring system, NowCast – and one of the most ambitious goals for reducing short-lived climate pollutants in the region. “It has helped enormously in terms of health protection, because we can now warn people much sooner, telling them not to go outside, not to exercise outdoors and to avoid inhaling highly polluted air,” said Sergio Zirath, Mexico’s director general of Industry, Clean Energy and Air Quality Management in an interview with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Mexico has now stepped in to provide technical advice to other countries across the region on clean air solutions. Although this is an effort being led by PAHO, an organization that also includes Canada and the United States, by definition as a strategy for Latin America and the Caribbean, neither are part of this new strategy. “PAHO respects every country’s decision on how they want to manage their policy. Our focus is based on evidence, action and available data,” said Castillo, when asked about the absence of the US from regional clean air activities since the Trump administration took over in January 2025. But in the end, Castillo hopes this strategic plan – an undertaking that still includes 21 countries, civil society, and PAHO – will be more than “just another document.” Instead, he hopes it will provide countries with an opportunity to capitalize on changes already happening in the region – ones that might even clean up the air in the region’s worst-polluted cities suffering from smog buffered by the high Andes. Image Credits: Municipality of Bethlehem, S. Samantaroy/HPW, Partnerships for Health Cities, TUMI, IQAir, IQAir, WHO/PAHO/Karina Zambrana . From Vaccines to Racism: RFK Faces Barrage of Questions in House Committee 16/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan Representative Linda Sanchez (left) questioning Kennedy about the explosion of measles cases under his watch. Undermining vaccines, failing pregnant black women, threatening to remove black children with ADHD from their parents – these were some of the barrage of questions put to United States Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr when he appeared before the House Ways and Means Committee on Thursday. Kennedy was testifying about the Trump administration’s 2027 budget, which proposes to cut the HHS budget by 12,5% – including deep cuts for HIV programmes ($923 million less), maternal and child health ($561m), and mental health ($576m). The Trump 2027 budget also proposes to eliminate $4.3 billion from the US government’s global health budget, which falls under the US State Department. Massive measles increase There has been a 675% increase in measles cases since Kennedy was appointed in February last year, according to US Representative Linda Sanchez. “In 2024, under the Biden administration, there were 258 cases of measles. And in 2025, under your leadership at HHS, this ballooned to over 2,000 [cases]. That’s a 675% increase, and we are now on track to suppress to surpass that this year, with over 1,600 confirmed cases in just three and a half months,” said Sanchez. Pointing to the death last year of a six-year-old unvaccinated girl from measles, the first death of a US child from measles in a decade, Sanchez asked Kennedy whether a measles vaccine could have saved her life. “It’s possible,” Kennedy answered. Robert F Kennedy Jr testifying before the House Ways and Means Committee. Sanchez tore into Kennedy for orchestrating the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) decision to remove its “universal vaccine recommendations for children covering seven immunizations, including things like flu, covid, hepatitis A, hepatitis B and rotavirus.” She also quoted Kennedy’s claim on Fox News last year that the adverse effects from the measles vaccine “cause deaths every year… and causes all the illnesses that measles itself causes.” Sanchez said that “CDC data shows that about 80% of children who died from flu this season were not vaccinated, [and] the anti-vaccine rhetoric you ran on and the anti-vaccine actions you have taken over the last year clearly correlates with the dramatic increases in preventable diseases.” She asked Kennedy repeatedly whether Trump agreed with the CDC decision to “suspend public health messaging on vaccines last February” – but Kennedy dodged the question, claiming Sanchez has “a lot of misinformation”. Representative Mike Thompson said that Kennedy is “helping make diseases deadly again.” “Kids have died because measles is running rampant under your watch, in large part because President Trump allowed your conspiracy theories to run our public health,” said Thompson. Undermining health of black women “Black women are nearly three times more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than white women, yet the Trump administration is undermining black maternal health from all sides,” said Representative Danny Davis, a leader of the Congressional Black Caucus. He cited the Trump administration’s decision to cut $1 trillion from Medicaid, “which pays for 40% of births”, the proposed cuts to maternal and child care for 2027, and cuts to research. “DOGE [Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency] cancelled funds for several research projects that could save countless black mothers, like the Morehouse School of Medicine research on improving the health of black pregnant and postpartum women,” said Davis. “How can we lower black maternal health experiences if we’re cutting funds for these critical programmes, and the administration is saying that you can’t consider race or ethnicity in healthcare?” In response, Kennedy claimed that there had been “tremendous duplication” in programmes and “we are investing huge amounts of money in maternal health.” The US has the highest maternal mortality rate in the developed world. ‘Reparenting’ black children? Representative Terri Sewell (centre) raised Kennedy’s comments that black children on ADHD medication should be “reparented” Describing various comments made by Kennedy as “outlandish and frankly disturbing”, Representative Terri Sewell took issue with his stating during a podcast interview that black children on ADHD medication should be “reparented”. “You said every black kid is now just standardly put on Adderall, SSRIs, benzos, which are known to induce violence, and that those children are going to have to go somewhere to get reparented,” said Sewell, reminding Kennedy that there was a long history of black children being removed from their parents, dating back to slavery. Despite Kennedy’s comments being recorded, he denied making them and said he “doesn’t even know what reparenting means”. Budget chief under pressure Meanwhile, health activists interrupted the testimony of Russell Vought, head of the US Office of Management and Budget (OMB), before the House Budget Committee on Wednesday. Minutes after Vought began his opening statement on the 2027 budget proposal, protesters tood up, holding up posters and shouting slogans accusing the Trump administration of killing people with HIV, and urging the administration to spend the funds Congress has allocated to the US President’s Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (PEPFAR). ”Russell Vought is directly responsible for illegally withholding Congressionally appropriated funds for PEPFAR and related global health initiatives. These funding disruptions have already contributed to preventable deaths and threaten to reverse decades of progress in the fight against HIV worldwide,” said Charles King, CEO of Housing Works, in a statement from the protestors issued by Health Gap. They accuse Vought of “blatant defiance of the will of Congress, which has fully funded PEPFAR programs for FY25 and FY26 over Vought’s objections, including by rejecting $400 million in rescission of PEPFAR funding in 2025.” “The FY27 President’s budget request for HIV and global health would eliminate HIV-specific and all disease-specific programming, while slashing overall global health funding by 46% compared with FY26 levels ($9.4 billion in FY26; $5.4 billion proposed in FY27 the President’s budget request),” according to the statement. “In addition to proposing deadly funding cuts, the FY27 budget request also disparages scientific evidence in global health, particularly regarding highly effective methods of HIV prevention, suggesting elimination of funding for condoms and programs for LGBTQ+ people, who face disproportionately high HIV risk of HIV infection due to criminalization and stigma,” according to the statement. Vought also recently diverted $15 million in USAID funding aimed at lifesaving humanitarian assistance to pay for his personal security, according to Reuters. Vought, former vice-president of the right-wing think tank Heritage Foundation, co-authored Project 2025, the conservative blueprint for governance being followed by the Trump administration. Posts navigation Older posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Bangladesh Tightens Control Over Tobacco But Excludes Smokeless Products 20/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan Around a quarter of Bangladeshi men smoke, which has major health impacts. Bangladesh’s new government has approved a wide-ranging anti-tobacco law that bans advertising, promotion and display across print, electronic, digital and social media, entertainment platforms and points of sale. The Smoking and Tobacco Usage (Control) (Amendment) Law, 2025 also prohibits corporate social responsibility initiatives from using tobacco brand names, logos or trademarks. Cigarette packs have to carry pictorial health warnings covering at least 75% of their surface and include the contact numbers of the national quit line. It also expands smoke-free public places and bans the sale and use of tobacco products within 100 meters of schools, hospitals, clinics and playgrounds. This is one of the first laws passed by the government of Prime Minister Tarique Rahman, who was sworn in last month after winning elections in February. Rahman’s Bangladesh National Party took over from an interim administration installed after an uprising in 2024 removed Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and her Awami League from power. the country has a high prevalence of tobacco use, with an estimated 25% of men in Bangladesh smoking – over 21 million. In 2023, around a quarter of deaths among men and 10% of women’s deaths were caused by tobacco – almost 200,000 people in total, according to the Tobacco Atlas. In addition to the substantial health burden, the annual cost of illness attributable to smoking in Bangladesh is estimated to be 730.63 billion takas (approximately US$5.9 billion). Vapes excluded The law does not cover newer tobacco and nicotine products, including vapes, heated tobacco products, electronic nicotine delivery systems and nicotine pouches. This is despite almost 25% of people using smokeless tobacco products, according to the Tobacco Atlas. Welcoming the law, Gan Quan, Vital Strategies’ senior vice president for tobacco control, urged its quick implementation. “This is a positive step, setting the stage to save millions of lives and deliver economic gains, so we must seize this moment with continued collaboration among government agencies, civil society and public health partners, and continuing public education about the harms caused by tobacco,” he said. “Together, we must remain vigilant against the industry’s attempts to subvert or delay these measures and further strengthen policy to address the regulation of emerging tobacco and nicotine products. There is an urgent need to protect youth in particular from being targeted with these products.” Smita Baruah, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids executive vice-president, said that the new measures “will drive down rates of tobacco use, save lives and protect kids from addiction to tobacco.” “Tobacco companies know that strong tobacco control laws work to stop people from smoking and prevent young people from starting to smoke, so they do everything in their power to undermine lifesaving laws like this. It is crucial that these measures be protected from the interests of the world’s largest tobacco companies,” she added. Image Credits: Simon Reza/ Unsplash. Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Include Access to Safe Abortion Services 20/04/2026 Maggie De Block Although the World Health Organization (WHO) recognises comprehensive abortion care as an essential health service, countries all over the world are tightening access, inspired by the United States. But all this means is worse outcomes for women’s health There is a persistent myth that restricting abortion stops it from happening. What restrictions really do – predictably and tragically – is make abortion unsafe. The WHO reports that around 73 million abortions occur worldwide each year, of which – remarkably – 45% are unsafe. The 2017 WHO–Guttmacher report found that 97% of unsafe abortions occurred in developing countries, particularly in Africa, Asia and Latin America, and WHO’s 2022 abortion care guideline notes that around seven million women in developing countries are treated for complications of unsafe abortion every year. Those are only the women who make it to care. Many do not. A preventable cause of maternal mortality The mortality gap between safe and unsafe abortion is stark. In settings where abortion is safe and legal, deaths are rare; where it is unsafe, the risks rise dramatically because the procedure is carried out by unskilled people or in environments that do not meet minimum medical standards, or both. Maternal deaths due to unsafe abortion are often misclassified and under-reported. A review encompassing the period 2009–20 found that 8% of maternal deaths globally were linked to abortion. In low- and middle-income countries, the impact of unsafe abortion is compounded by weak primary care systems, provider shortages, long travel distances, punitive laws, and stigma. The result is delay, secrecy, shame, and complications that could have been prevented. Put simply: when states fail to provide access to safe care, women do not stop seeking abortions. Rather, they are placed in unnecessary danger, with serious health, social and economic consequences. Safe abortion is a basic human right Access to safe abortion is grounded in international human rights law, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. In Africa, the Maputo Protocol provides an especially important regional anchor for women’s reproductive rights. Many human rights bodies and mechanisms agree that lack of access to quality abortion care risks violating the rights of women and girls, including the right to life; the right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health; the right to benefit from scientific progress and its realisation; the right to decide freely and responsibly on the number, spacing and timing of children; rights to privacy and to freedom from discrimination, and the right to be free from torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment. Human rights bodies have also noted that restrictions on access to abortion affect some women disproportionately. The UN Working Group on Discrimination Against Women in Law and in Practice has observed that “in countries where induced termination of pregnancy is restricted by law and/or otherwise unavailable, safe termination of pregnancy is a privilege of the rich, while women with limited resources have little choice but to resort to unsafe providers.” The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women has expressed particular concern that “rural women are more likely to resort to unsafe abortion than their urban counterparts”. The same is true for adolescents, who frequently lack information. The Committee on the Rights of the Child has urged States “to decriminalise abortion to ensure that girls have access to safe abortion and postabortion services, review legislation with a view to guaranteeing the best interests of pregnant adolescents and ensure that their views are always heard and respected in abortion-related decisions.” Comprehensive abortion care is more than medicines The practical case for ensuring access to abortion services is also strong because the tools already exist. WHO’s 2023 clinical guidance and self-care recommendations recognise medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol as a safe and effective option, and these medicines are included on the WHO Essential Medicines List. The WHO guideline also states that medical abortion can be self-managed using mifepristone plus misoprostol or misoprostol alone where people have accurate information and access to a trained health worker if needed. In resource-constrained settings, that matters enormously. Medication abortion can reduce dependence on scarce specialist infrastructure, make earlier care more feasible, and expand access to rural and other underserved women. But medicines alone are not enough. Women also need quality-assured products, clear information, referral pathways, pain management, and emergency backup if needed. A tablet without a system to support its use is not access. Comprehensive abortion care also includes contraception, counselling and information, timely diagnosis, medical or surgical abortion where appropriate, and post-abortion care for complications after miscarriage or unsafe abortion. Post-abortion care is not an optional extra. Abortion access is shaped by many other policies and practices: access to contraception, laws on marital consent, approaches to gender-based violence, access to adoption services, affordability, provider bias, supply chains, transport, privacy and digital information, religious views, and whether women trust the health system enough to use it. If someone must travel for hours, pay out of pocket, or be shamed and harassed for seeking care, she does not have real access. What governments and donors must do: Reform laws and regulations that criminalise or unduly restrict abortion care. Criminalisation of abortion must end. Punitive laws on women and service providers drive delay, secrecy and unsafe methods. Make mifepristone and misoprostol reliably available and affordable. Registration, procurement, quality assurance and distribution are essential policy choices. Integrate abortion into primary health care and universal health coverage packages. Abortion should not be separate from routine sexual, reproductive and maternal health services. Expand provider training and task-sharing. WHO guidance supports community service models, which are crucial in workforce-constrained settings. Guarantee access to post-abortion care. Even in restrictive settings, treating complications is an absolute minimum standard. Invest in information, privacy and building trust. Women need accurate information and safe pathways into care, with compassion, and without stigma. The choice is political The impact of unsafe abortion on maternal mortality is indisputable. The medicines and standards of care for safe abortion are well established. The rights framework is clear. What remains is a political choice – whether governments, donors and multilateral institutions will treat safe abortion as basic health care or continue to support a hierarchy in which women suffer indignity and die of preventable causes while others pass judgement. Above all, let’s start from this simple premise: women and girls are not vessels for state or religious ideology. They are rights-holders. If governments are serious about realising the right to health and reducing maternal mortality, then safe abortion access must be part of the plan – explicitly, urgently, and at scale. Maggie De Block served as Belgium’s Minister of Social Affairs and Health from 2014 to 2020. She is a medical doctor and a member of the Belgian Chamber of Representatives. Image Credits: Center for Reproductive Rights. ‘A Unique Moment’: New Regional Air Pollution Plans Aim to Cut Health Burden Across Latin America 17/04/2026 Sophia Samantaroy Medellin, Colombia’s second largest city, is located in the northern Andes, where smog becomes trapped through meteorological temperature inversions. The Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO) will soon unveil a new Roadmap on Air Quality and Health, following on from a meeting with countries and other stakeholders in February in Mexico. The PAHO strategy dovetails with an ambitious new regional action plan by the UN Environment Programme – which supports the work of environment ministries. While the high mountains of the Andes might be associated in popular imagination with crystal clear air, in fact, these 4000+ meter high mountains also trap air pollution, smothering cities nestled in their towering ranges. It is visual testimony to the health impacts of an air pollution problem that kills some 370,000 people annually across Latin America and the Caribbean. But Latin American and Caribbean countries are at a “unique moment” in terms of opportunities to improve air quality, marking a critical pivot toward treating air pollution not merely as an environmental byproduct, but as a top-tier public health emergency, according to Juan J Castillo who leads the air quality team at PAHO, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) regional office for the Americas. “We see this action plan as an opportunity to send a strong message to the region, to the ministers of health and the environment, that there is a clear case for health in improving air quality,” said Juan Castillo. His team has been leading the plan’s development while also working to bolster collaboration across Latin America, connecting ministries of the environment and health, and closing the air pollution monitoring gap. Meeting the WHO goal to halve deaths from air pollution by 2040 Latin American cities are already taking climate adaptation measures, like Barranquilla, shown here. But air pollution experts highlight the health benefits of green urban desgin. The action plan comes a year after the World Health Organization’s second conference on Air pollution and health, hosted in Cartagena, Colombia. A core aim of the plan is to create a pathway for meeting the WHO target set out at the Cartagena meeting of halving deaths from air pollution by 2040. At the conference, some 20 countries, including many from the Latin American region, made related pledges. But the action plan aims to mainstream the goal into the plans of health ministries. Over 700 stakeholders gathered in Cartagena, Colombia, for the 2nd WHO Air Pollution and Health in 2025. “This is truly a pivotal point,” Castillo said. “Latin America requires solutions that respond to the specific needs of the region. This is why it is charting its own path towards cleaner air- and one that could inspire other lower- and middle-income nations, fostering further South-South cooperation.” Latin America and the Caribbean already have cleaner air, on average, than hot spots like South East Asia, there is still a long way to go to achieve the World Health Organization quality goals. Some cities in the region actually meet WHO air quality guidelines for particulate matter (PM2.5) and others exceed them “only” by one to two times. However, a number of cities in Chile, Brazil, Bolivia and Peru, have average annual PM2.5 concentrations reaching 3-5 times above WHO guidelines, according to the 2025 report of the Swiss-based monitoring firm, IQ-Air. Lima, Peru is one noteworthy example. The health argument for cleaner skies Local authorities in Lima, Peru promote cycling as part of a sustainable mobility effort. “The evidence shows that there is a huge burden of disease linked to air pollution in the region,” said Castillo. “Air pollution is one of the leading causes of non-communicable diseases and also for all kinds of morbidity, such as asthma attacks, respiratory infections and impaired cognitive development. So we’re focused on using the evidence to help countries make the best decision to achieve their public health goals.” Many countries in Latin America have implemented steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but these climate policies often neglect to consider the health benefits of tackling climate pollutants. These health impact assessments of climate mitigation are crucial and are included in the Organization’s Air Quality and Health Plan for Latin America and the Caribbean, said Castillo. “We need to understand the health gains to bolster the argument for environmental policies and to help with the strategic importance of these policies.” Integrating air quality action on climate change “can be particularly beneficial, as it broadens access to funding and delivers greater public health benefits,” notes a December 2025 regional action strategy by the UNEP-hosted Climate and Clean Air Coalition. Action needed beyond the health sector An all-electric bus in Brasilia is one of many rolled out across Latin America. The CCAC strategy is targeted to ministries of the environment, while the PAHO roadmap focuses on ministries of health. But the two aim to work in tandem to build political will for systemic changes that reduce air pollution. Such changes typically require action on finance, transport, building and household energy systems, urban design and waste management – well beyond the traditional domain of health ministries. In terms of transport, a major air pollution factor, Latin America historically has had stronger public transport systems than many other developing regions, and cities such as Curitiba and Bogota became pioneers in developing Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) as well as cycle networks, which helped reduce emissions from private automobiles. Baranquilla has pioneered several clean transport initiatives, such as electric buses, as shown in a Transformative Urban Mobility Initiative brochure. But too often, BRT systems in the region have remained too dependent on dirty diesel – where cleaner electric systems are needed to really clean up the air further. Now, there is a move to electrify BRT systems in key Latin American cities such as Brasilia, Brazil and Barranquilla, Colombia, supported partly by German development assistance as well as local initiatives. Barranquilla, Colombia, has undergone a massive urban renewal effort with the aim of shifting to a 50% electric bus fleet by 2034. Public transport is being integrated with cycle networks and pedestrian-friendly streets – about 30% of travel is on foot – supporting healthier, more active, and low-emissions mobility. PAHO hopes that more cities can see the health benefits of urban design – and use climate funding for greener cities that foster public health. Closing the monitoring and data gap The new PAHO roadmap advocates for better air quality monitoring to better inform policymakers. Tracking air quality progress has been a challenge for the region. Less than 40% of countries have a government standard for chronic exposure to the most dangerous form of particulate pollution, PM2.5. Without these standards, governments cannot chart further regulation to clean up polluted skies. The region has also struggled with tracking air quality. Only a third of cities in the region have active reference monitoring stations- or local inventories of criteria pollutant emissions, active air management programs, or government-published health impact assessments, according to the most recent regional action plan. And only seven cities have air quality forecasting systems. The data that is available raises several concerns. Of the 58 cities with PM2.5 data, only one city complies with the WHO guideline values. The region of Latin America and the Caribbean has, on average, enjoys cleaner air than South Asia or the African continent. Much of the poorer air quality is in urban centers and the Andean region. “Many cities lack key tools, or those that exist are not operational, up to date, or in use, while their populations remain exposed to harmful pollution levels,” says CCAC in its 2025 regional strategy. A consortium of South American researchers echoed that, in a 2025 review that stated: “South America would greatly benefit from expanded monitoring networks, improved air quality modeling, and detailed health data to better understand exposure–health relationships and multipollutant interactions.” Grassroots organizers like Ana Badillo, a co-founder of the Ecuador-based advocacy group Pacha Ayllu, have also championed access to real-time air quality data through the expanded use by “citizen-scientists” of low-cost air pollution sensors in the capital city of Quito. “This citizen-led monitoring network is designed to empower individuals and communities to better understand the quality of the air they breathe and make informed decisions to protect their health and that of their loved ones,” said Badillo in a recent post. The democratization of data is also central to the new CCAC strategy, which is promoting its AQMx Platform, a digital hub designed to support air quality management exchange and integrate conventional air quality monitoring with low-cost sensor networks, relying more on civil society groups like Pacha Ayllu. Collaborating across sectors At COP30 in Belém in 2025, Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus signaled a historic shift by formalizing the Belém Health Action Plan, highlighting the urgency of climate action for health. With funding an “obvious” challenge for cleaning up Latin America’s air, PAHO and its partners have emphasized the health gains of environmental interventions to help governments understand the strategic importance of such changes. In relation to that, collaboration across the energy and environmental sectors is key, says Castillo, whose office is also working closely with the UNEP-hosted CCAC. Tapping into energy sector investments also means cleaner, more affordable, and reliable energy. The new CCAC strategy targets not only air pollution, but a “triple planetary crisis” – climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution – by focusing on the reduction of “super pollutants” like black carbon and methane a precursor of ground level ozone (O3), as well as a powerful climate pollutant. But black carbon and methane do not remain long in the atmosphere, reductions can yield rapid gains for health as well as climate. By making air quality projects “bankable” for multilateral giants like the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), the plan seeks to move beyond sporadic grants toward a flexible financing architecture that includes green bonds and blended finance. Mexico City: a story of success A combination of Mexico City’s high population, geography, and occasional wildfires have made clean air a challenge for decades. Castillo pointed to the example of Mexico City, which once had some of the most polluted air in the Americas, or even the world, as a story of success. It was grassroots organizations that agitated for clean air protections. “They demanded action,” Castillo said. “And many other places are following suit.” Mexico City has developed a robust air quality monitoring system, NowCast – and one of the most ambitious goals for reducing short-lived climate pollutants in the region. “It has helped enormously in terms of health protection, because we can now warn people much sooner, telling them not to go outside, not to exercise outdoors and to avoid inhaling highly polluted air,” said Sergio Zirath, Mexico’s director general of Industry, Clean Energy and Air Quality Management in an interview with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Mexico has now stepped in to provide technical advice to other countries across the region on clean air solutions. Although this is an effort being led by PAHO, an organization that also includes Canada and the United States, by definition as a strategy for Latin America and the Caribbean, neither are part of this new strategy. “PAHO respects every country’s decision on how they want to manage their policy. Our focus is based on evidence, action and available data,” said Castillo, when asked about the absence of the US from regional clean air activities since the Trump administration took over in January 2025. But in the end, Castillo hopes this strategic plan – an undertaking that still includes 21 countries, civil society, and PAHO – will be more than “just another document.” Instead, he hopes it will provide countries with an opportunity to capitalize on changes already happening in the region – ones that might even clean up the air in the region’s worst-polluted cities suffering from smog buffered by the high Andes. Image Credits: Municipality of Bethlehem, S. Samantaroy/HPW, Partnerships for Health Cities, TUMI, IQAir, IQAir, WHO/PAHO/Karina Zambrana . From Vaccines to Racism: RFK Faces Barrage of Questions in House Committee 16/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan Representative Linda Sanchez (left) questioning Kennedy about the explosion of measles cases under his watch. Undermining vaccines, failing pregnant black women, threatening to remove black children with ADHD from their parents – these were some of the barrage of questions put to United States Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr when he appeared before the House Ways and Means Committee on Thursday. Kennedy was testifying about the Trump administration’s 2027 budget, which proposes to cut the HHS budget by 12,5% – including deep cuts for HIV programmes ($923 million less), maternal and child health ($561m), and mental health ($576m). The Trump 2027 budget also proposes to eliminate $4.3 billion from the US government’s global health budget, which falls under the US State Department. Massive measles increase There has been a 675% increase in measles cases since Kennedy was appointed in February last year, according to US Representative Linda Sanchez. “In 2024, under the Biden administration, there were 258 cases of measles. And in 2025, under your leadership at HHS, this ballooned to over 2,000 [cases]. That’s a 675% increase, and we are now on track to suppress to surpass that this year, with over 1,600 confirmed cases in just three and a half months,” said Sanchez. Pointing to the death last year of a six-year-old unvaccinated girl from measles, the first death of a US child from measles in a decade, Sanchez asked Kennedy whether a measles vaccine could have saved her life. “It’s possible,” Kennedy answered. Robert F Kennedy Jr testifying before the House Ways and Means Committee. Sanchez tore into Kennedy for orchestrating the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) decision to remove its “universal vaccine recommendations for children covering seven immunizations, including things like flu, covid, hepatitis A, hepatitis B and rotavirus.” She also quoted Kennedy’s claim on Fox News last year that the adverse effects from the measles vaccine “cause deaths every year… and causes all the illnesses that measles itself causes.” Sanchez said that “CDC data shows that about 80% of children who died from flu this season were not vaccinated, [and] the anti-vaccine rhetoric you ran on and the anti-vaccine actions you have taken over the last year clearly correlates with the dramatic increases in preventable diseases.” She asked Kennedy repeatedly whether Trump agreed with the CDC decision to “suspend public health messaging on vaccines last February” – but Kennedy dodged the question, claiming Sanchez has “a lot of misinformation”. Representative Mike Thompson said that Kennedy is “helping make diseases deadly again.” “Kids have died because measles is running rampant under your watch, in large part because President Trump allowed your conspiracy theories to run our public health,” said Thompson. Undermining health of black women “Black women are nearly three times more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than white women, yet the Trump administration is undermining black maternal health from all sides,” said Representative Danny Davis, a leader of the Congressional Black Caucus. He cited the Trump administration’s decision to cut $1 trillion from Medicaid, “which pays for 40% of births”, the proposed cuts to maternal and child care for 2027, and cuts to research. “DOGE [Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency] cancelled funds for several research projects that could save countless black mothers, like the Morehouse School of Medicine research on improving the health of black pregnant and postpartum women,” said Davis. “How can we lower black maternal health experiences if we’re cutting funds for these critical programmes, and the administration is saying that you can’t consider race or ethnicity in healthcare?” In response, Kennedy claimed that there had been “tremendous duplication” in programmes and “we are investing huge amounts of money in maternal health.” The US has the highest maternal mortality rate in the developed world. ‘Reparenting’ black children? Representative Terri Sewell (centre) raised Kennedy’s comments that black children on ADHD medication should be “reparented” Describing various comments made by Kennedy as “outlandish and frankly disturbing”, Representative Terri Sewell took issue with his stating during a podcast interview that black children on ADHD medication should be “reparented”. “You said every black kid is now just standardly put on Adderall, SSRIs, benzos, which are known to induce violence, and that those children are going to have to go somewhere to get reparented,” said Sewell, reminding Kennedy that there was a long history of black children being removed from their parents, dating back to slavery. Despite Kennedy’s comments being recorded, he denied making them and said he “doesn’t even know what reparenting means”. Budget chief under pressure Meanwhile, health activists interrupted the testimony of Russell Vought, head of the US Office of Management and Budget (OMB), before the House Budget Committee on Wednesday. Minutes after Vought began his opening statement on the 2027 budget proposal, protesters tood up, holding up posters and shouting slogans accusing the Trump administration of killing people with HIV, and urging the administration to spend the funds Congress has allocated to the US President’s Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (PEPFAR). ”Russell Vought is directly responsible for illegally withholding Congressionally appropriated funds for PEPFAR and related global health initiatives. These funding disruptions have already contributed to preventable deaths and threaten to reverse decades of progress in the fight against HIV worldwide,” said Charles King, CEO of Housing Works, in a statement from the protestors issued by Health Gap. They accuse Vought of “blatant defiance of the will of Congress, which has fully funded PEPFAR programs for FY25 and FY26 over Vought’s objections, including by rejecting $400 million in rescission of PEPFAR funding in 2025.” “The FY27 President’s budget request for HIV and global health would eliminate HIV-specific and all disease-specific programming, while slashing overall global health funding by 46% compared with FY26 levels ($9.4 billion in FY26; $5.4 billion proposed in FY27 the President’s budget request),” according to the statement. “In addition to proposing deadly funding cuts, the FY27 budget request also disparages scientific evidence in global health, particularly regarding highly effective methods of HIV prevention, suggesting elimination of funding for condoms and programs for LGBTQ+ people, who face disproportionately high HIV risk of HIV infection due to criminalization and stigma,” according to the statement. Vought also recently diverted $15 million in USAID funding aimed at lifesaving humanitarian assistance to pay for his personal security, according to Reuters. Vought, former vice-president of the right-wing think tank Heritage Foundation, co-authored Project 2025, the conservative blueprint for governance being followed by the Trump administration. Posts navigation Older posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Include Access to Safe Abortion Services 20/04/2026 Maggie De Block Although the World Health Organization (WHO) recognises comprehensive abortion care as an essential health service, countries all over the world are tightening access, inspired by the United States. But all this means is worse outcomes for women’s health There is a persistent myth that restricting abortion stops it from happening. What restrictions really do – predictably and tragically – is make abortion unsafe. The WHO reports that around 73 million abortions occur worldwide each year, of which – remarkably – 45% are unsafe. The 2017 WHO–Guttmacher report found that 97% of unsafe abortions occurred in developing countries, particularly in Africa, Asia and Latin America, and WHO’s 2022 abortion care guideline notes that around seven million women in developing countries are treated for complications of unsafe abortion every year. Those are only the women who make it to care. Many do not. A preventable cause of maternal mortality The mortality gap between safe and unsafe abortion is stark. In settings where abortion is safe and legal, deaths are rare; where it is unsafe, the risks rise dramatically because the procedure is carried out by unskilled people or in environments that do not meet minimum medical standards, or both. Maternal deaths due to unsafe abortion are often misclassified and under-reported. A review encompassing the period 2009–20 found that 8% of maternal deaths globally were linked to abortion. In low- and middle-income countries, the impact of unsafe abortion is compounded by weak primary care systems, provider shortages, long travel distances, punitive laws, and stigma. The result is delay, secrecy, shame, and complications that could have been prevented. Put simply: when states fail to provide access to safe care, women do not stop seeking abortions. Rather, they are placed in unnecessary danger, with serious health, social and economic consequences. Safe abortion is a basic human right Access to safe abortion is grounded in international human rights law, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. In Africa, the Maputo Protocol provides an especially important regional anchor for women’s reproductive rights. Many human rights bodies and mechanisms agree that lack of access to quality abortion care risks violating the rights of women and girls, including the right to life; the right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health; the right to benefit from scientific progress and its realisation; the right to decide freely and responsibly on the number, spacing and timing of children; rights to privacy and to freedom from discrimination, and the right to be free from torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment. Human rights bodies have also noted that restrictions on access to abortion affect some women disproportionately. The UN Working Group on Discrimination Against Women in Law and in Practice has observed that “in countries where induced termination of pregnancy is restricted by law and/or otherwise unavailable, safe termination of pregnancy is a privilege of the rich, while women with limited resources have little choice but to resort to unsafe providers.” The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women has expressed particular concern that “rural women are more likely to resort to unsafe abortion than their urban counterparts”. The same is true for adolescents, who frequently lack information. The Committee on the Rights of the Child has urged States “to decriminalise abortion to ensure that girls have access to safe abortion and postabortion services, review legislation with a view to guaranteeing the best interests of pregnant adolescents and ensure that their views are always heard and respected in abortion-related decisions.” Comprehensive abortion care is more than medicines The practical case for ensuring access to abortion services is also strong because the tools already exist. WHO’s 2023 clinical guidance and self-care recommendations recognise medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol as a safe and effective option, and these medicines are included on the WHO Essential Medicines List. The WHO guideline also states that medical abortion can be self-managed using mifepristone plus misoprostol or misoprostol alone where people have accurate information and access to a trained health worker if needed. In resource-constrained settings, that matters enormously. Medication abortion can reduce dependence on scarce specialist infrastructure, make earlier care more feasible, and expand access to rural and other underserved women. But medicines alone are not enough. Women also need quality-assured products, clear information, referral pathways, pain management, and emergency backup if needed. A tablet without a system to support its use is not access. Comprehensive abortion care also includes contraception, counselling and information, timely diagnosis, medical or surgical abortion where appropriate, and post-abortion care for complications after miscarriage or unsafe abortion. Post-abortion care is not an optional extra. Abortion access is shaped by many other policies and practices: access to contraception, laws on marital consent, approaches to gender-based violence, access to adoption services, affordability, provider bias, supply chains, transport, privacy and digital information, religious views, and whether women trust the health system enough to use it. If someone must travel for hours, pay out of pocket, or be shamed and harassed for seeking care, she does not have real access. What governments and donors must do: Reform laws and regulations that criminalise or unduly restrict abortion care. Criminalisation of abortion must end. Punitive laws on women and service providers drive delay, secrecy and unsafe methods. Make mifepristone and misoprostol reliably available and affordable. Registration, procurement, quality assurance and distribution are essential policy choices. Integrate abortion into primary health care and universal health coverage packages. Abortion should not be separate from routine sexual, reproductive and maternal health services. Expand provider training and task-sharing. WHO guidance supports community service models, which are crucial in workforce-constrained settings. Guarantee access to post-abortion care. Even in restrictive settings, treating complications is an absolute minimum standard. Invest in information, privacy and building trust. Women need accurate information and safe pathways into care, with compassion, and without stigma. The choice is political The impact of unsafe abortion on maternal mortality is indisputable. The medicines and standards of care for safe abortion are well established. The rights framework is clear. What remains is a political choice – whether governments, donors and multilateral institutions will treat safe abortion as basic health care or continue to support a hierarchy in which women suffer indignity and die of preventable causes while others pass judgement. Above all, let’s start from this simple premise: women and girls are not vessels for state or religious ideology. They are rights-holders. If governments are serious about realising the right to health and reducing maternal mortality, then safe abortion access must be part of the plan – explicitly, urgently, and at scale. Maggie De Block served as Belgium’s Minister of Social Affairs and Health from 2014 to 2020. She is a medical doctor and a member of the Belgian Chamber of Representatives. Image Credits: Center for Reproductive Rights. ‘A Unique Moment’: New Regional Air Pollution Plans Aim to Cut Health Burden Across Latin America 17/04/2026 Sophia Samantaroy Medellin, Colombia’s second largest city, is located in the northern Andes, where smog becomes trapped through meteorological temperature inversions. The Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO) will soon unveil a new Roadmap on Air Quality and Health, following on from a meeting with countries and other stakeholders in February in Mexico. The PAHO strategy dovetails with an ambitious new regional action plan by the UN Environment Programme – which supports the work of environment ministries. While the high mountains of the Andes might be associated in popular imagination with crystal clear air, in fact, these 4000+ meter high mountains also trap air pollution, smothering cities nestled in their towering ranges. It is visual testimony to the health impacts of an air pollution problem that kills some 370,000 people annually across Latin America and the Caribbean. But Latin American and Caribbean countries are at a “unique moment” in terms of opportunities to improve air quality, marking a critical pivot toward treating air pollution not merely as an environmental byproduct, but as a top-tier public health emergency, according to Juan J Castillo who leads the air quality team at PAHO, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) regional office for the Americas. “We see this action plan as an opportunity to send a strong message to the region, to the ministers of health and the environment, that there is a clear case for health in improving air quality,” said Juan Castillo. His team has been leading the plan’s development while also working to bolster collaboration across Latin America, connecting ministries of the environment and health, and closing the air pollution monitoring gap. Meeting the WHO goal to halve deaths from air pollution by 2040 Latin American cities are already taking climate adaptation measures, like Barranquilla, shown here. But air pollution experts highlight the health benefits of green urban desgin. The action plan comes a year after the World Health Organization’s second conference on Air pollution and health, hosted in Cartagena, Colombia. A core aim of the plan is to create a pathway for meeting the WHO target set out at the Cartagena meeting of halving deaths from air pollution by 2040. At the conference, some 20 countries, including many from the Latin American region, made related pledges. But the action plan aims to mainstream the goal into the plans of health ministries. Over 700 stakeholders gathered in Cartagena, Colombia, for the 2nd WHO Air Pollution and Health in 2025. “This is truly a pivotal point,” Castillo said. “Latin America requires solutions that respond to the specific needs of the region. This is why it is charting its own path towards cleaner air- and one that could inspire other lower- and middle-income nations, fostering further South-South cooperation.” Latin America and the Caribbean already have cleaner air, on average, than hot spots like South East Asia, there is still a long way to go to achieve the World Health Organization quality goals. Some cities in the region actually meet WHO air quality guidelines for particulate matter (PM2.5) and others exceed them “only” by one to two times. However, a number of cities in Chile, Brazil, Bolivia and Peru, have average annual PM2.5 concentrations reaching 3-5 times above WHO guidelines, according to the 2025 report of the Swiss-based monitoring firm, IQ-Air. Lima, Peru is one noteworthy example. The health argument for cleaner skies Local authorities in Lima, Peru promote cycling as part of a sustainable mobility effort. “The evidence shows that there is a huge burden of disease linked to air pollution in the region,” said Castillo. “Air pollution is one of the leading causes of non-communicable diseases and also for all kinds of morbidity, such as asthma attacks, respiratory infections and impaired cognitive development. So we’re focused on using the evidence to help countries make the best decision to achieve their public health goals.” Many countries in Latin America have implemented steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but these climate policies often neglect to consider the health benefits of tackling climate pollutants. These health impact assessments of climate mitigation are crucial and are included in the Organization’s Air Quality and Health Plan for Latin America and the Caribbean, said Castillo. “We need to understand the health gains to bolster the argument for environmental policies and to help with the strategic importance of these policies.” Integrating air quality action on climate change “can be particularly beneficial, as it broadens access to funding and delivers greater public health benefits,” notes a December 2025 regional action strategy by the UNEP-hosted Climate and Clean Air Coalition. Action needed beyond the health sector An all-electric bus in Brasilia is one of many rolled out across Latin America. The CCAC strategy is targeted to ministries of the environment, while the PAHO roadmap focuses on ministries of health. But the two aim to work in tandem to build political will for systemic changes that reduce air pollution. Such changes typically require action on finance, transport, building and household energy systems, urban design and waste management – well beyond the traditional domain of health ministries. In terms of transport, a major air pollution factor, Latin America historically has had stronger public transport systems than many other developing regions, and cities such as Curitiba and Bogota became pioneers in developing Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) as well as cycle networks, which helped reduce emissions from private automobiles. Baranquilla has pioneered several clean transport initiatives, such as electric buses, as shown in a Transformative Urban Mobility Initiative brochure. But too often, BRT systems in the region have remained too dependent on dirty diesel – where cleaner electric systems are needed to really clean up the air further. Now, there is a move to electrify BRT systems in key Latin American cities such as Brasilia, Brazil and Barranquilla, Colombia, supported partly by German development assistance as well as local initiatives. Barranquilla, Colombia, has undergone a massive urban renewal effort with the aim of shifting to a 50% electric bus fleet by 2034. Public transport is being integrated with cycle networks and pedestrian-friendly streets – about 30% of travel is on foot – supporting healthier, more active, and low-emissions mobility. PAHO hopes that more cities can see the health benefits of urban design – and use climate funding for greener cities that foster public health. Closing the monitoring and data gap The new PAHO roadmap advocates for better air quality monitoring to better inform policymakers. Tracking air quality progress has been a challenge for the region. Less than 40% of countries have a government standard for chronic exposure to the most dangerous form of particulate pollution, PM2.5. Without these standards, governments cannot chart further regulation to clean up polluted skies. The region has also struggled with tracking air quality. Only a third of cities in the region have active reference monitoring stations- or local inventories of criteria pollutant emissions, active air management programs, or government-published health impact assessments, according to the most recent regional action plan. And only seven cities have air quality forecasting systems. The data that is available raises several concerns. Of the 58 cities with PM2.5 data, only one city complies with the WHO guideline values. The region of Latin America and the Caribbean has, on average, enjoys cleaner air than South Asia or the African continent. Much of the poorer air quality is in urban centers and the Andean region. “Many cities lack key tools, or those that exist are not operational, up to date, or in use, while their populations remain exposed to harmful pollution levels,” says CCAC in its 2025 regional strategy. A consortium of South American researchers echoed that, in a 2025 review that stated: “South America would greatly benefit from expanded monitoring networks, improved air quality modeling, and detailed health data to better understand exposure–health relationships and multipollutant interactions.” Grassroots organizers like Ana Badillo, a co-founder of the Ecuador-based advocacy group Pacha Ayllu, have also championed access to real-time air quality data through the expanded use by “citizen-scientists” of low-cost air pollution sensors in the capital city of Quito. “This citizen-led monitoring network is designed to empower individuals and communities to better understand the quality of the air they breathe and make informed decisions to protect their health and that of their loved ones,” said Badillo in a recent post. The democratization of data is also central to the new CCAC strategy, which is promoting its AQMx Platform, a digital hub designed to support air quality management exchange and integrate conventional air quality monitoring with low-cost sensor networks, relying more on civil society groups like Pacha Ayllu. Collaborating across sectors At COP30 in Belém in 2025, Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus signaled a historic shift by formalizing the Belém Health Action Plan, highlighting the urgency of climate action for health. With funding an “obvious” challenge for cleaning up Latin America’s air, PAHO and its partners have emphasized the health gains of environmental interventions to help governments understand the strategic importance of such changes. In relation to that, collaboration across the energy and environmental sectors is key, says Castillo, whose office is also working closely with the UNEP-hosted CCAC. Tapping into energy sector investments also means cleaner, more affordable, and reliable energy. The new CCAC strategy targets not only air pollution, but a “triple planetary crisis” – climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution – by focusing on the reduction of “super pollutants” like black carbon and methane a precursor of ground level ozone (O3), as well as a powerful climate pollutant. But black carbon and methane do not remain long in the atmosphere, reductions can yield rapid gains for health as well as climate. By making air quality projects “bankable” for multilateral giants like the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), the plan seeks to move beyond sporadic grants toward a flexible financing architecture that includes green bonds and blended finance. Mexico City: a story of success A combination of Mexico City’s high population, geography, and occasional wildfires have made clean air a challenge for decades. Castillo pointed to the example of Mexico City, which once had some of the most polluted air in the Americas, or even the world, as a story of success. It was grassroots organizations that agitated for clean air protections. “They demanded action,” Castillo said. “And many other places are following suit.” Mexico City has developed a robust air quality monitoring system, NowCast – and one of the most ambitious goals for reducing short-lived climate pollutants in the region. “It has helped enormously in terms of health protection, because we can now warn people much sooner, telling them not to go outside, not to exercise outdoors and to avoid inhaling highly polluted air,” said Sergio Zirath, Mexico’s director general of Industry, Clean Energy and Air Quality Management in an interview with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Mexico has now stepped in to provide technical advice to other countries across the region on clean air solutions. Although this is an effort being led by PAHO, an organization that also includes Canada and the United States, by definition as a strategy for Latin America and the Caribbean, neither are part of this new strategy. “PAHO respects every country’s decision on how they want to manage their policy. Our focus is based on evidence, action and available data,” said Castillo, when asked about the absence of the US from regional clean air activities since the Trump administration took over in January 2025. But in the end, Castillo hopes this strategic plan – an undertaking that still includes 21 countries, civil society, and PAHO – will be more than “just another document.” Instead, he hopes it will provide countries with an opportunity to capitalize on changes already happening in the region – ones that might even clean up the air in the region’s worst-polluted cities suffering from smog buffered by the high Andes. Image Credits: Municipality of Bethlehem, S. Samantaroy/HPW, Partnerships for Health Cities, TUMI, IQAir, IQAir, WHO/PAHO/Karina Zambrana . From Vaccines to Racism: RFK Faces Barrage of Questions in House Committee 16/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan Representative Linda Sanchez (left) questioning Kennedy about the explosion of measles cases under his watch. Undermining vaccines, failing pregnant black women, threatening to remove black children with ADHD from their parents – these were some of the barrage of questions put to United States Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr when he appeared before the House Ways and Means Committee on Thursday. Kennedy was testifying about the Trump administration’s 2027 budget, which proposes to cut the HHS budget by 12,5% – including deep cuts for HIV programmes ($923 million less), maternal and child health ($561m), and mental health ($576m). The Trump 2027 budget also proposes to eliminate $4.3 billion from the US government’s global health budget, which falls under the US State Department. Massive measles increase There has been a 675% increase in measles cases since Kennedy was appointed in February last year, according to US Representative Linda Sanchez. “In 2024, under the Biden administration, there were 258 cases of measles. And in 2025, under your leadership at HHS, this ballooned to over 2,000 [cases]. That’s a 675% increase, and we are now on track to suppress to surpass that this year, with over 1,600 confirmed cases in just three and a half months,” said Sanchez. Pointing to the death last year of a six-year-old unvaccinated girl from measles, the first death of a US child from measles in a decade, Sanchez asked Kennedy whether a measles vaccine could have saved her life. “It’s possible,” Kennedy answered. Robert F Kennedy Jr testifying before the House Ways and Means Committee. Sanchez tore into Kennedy for orchestrating the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) decision to remove its “universal vaccine recommendations for children covering seven immunizations, including things like flu, covid, hepatitis A, hepatitis B and rotavirus.” She also quoted Kennedy’s claim on Fox News last year that the adverse effects from the measles vaccine “cause deaths every year… and causes all the illnesses that measles itself causes.” Sanchez said that “CDC data shows that about 80% of children who died from flu this season were not vaccinated, [and] the anti-vaccine rhetoric you ran on and the anti-vaccine actions you have taken over the last year clearly correlates with the dramatic increases in preventable diseases.” She asked Kennedy repeatedly whether Trump agreed with the CDC decision to “suspend public health messaging on vaccines last February” – but Kennedy dodged the question, claiming Sanchez has “a lot of misinformation”. Representative Mike Thompson said that Kennedy is “helping make diseases deadly again.” “Kids have died because measles is running rampant under your watch, in large part because President Trump allowed your conspiracy theories to run our public health,” said Thompson. Undermining health of black women “Black women are nearly three times more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than white women, yet the Trump administration is undermining black maternal health from all sides,” said Representative Danny Davis, a leader of the Congressional Black Caucus. He cited the Trump administration’s decision to cut $1 trillion from Medicaid, “which pays for 40% of births”, the proposed cuts to maternal and child care for 2027, and cuts to research. “DOGE [Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency] cancelled funds for several research projects that could save countless black mothers, like the Morehouse School of Medicine research on improving the health of black pregnant and postpartum women,” said Davis. “How can we lower black maternal health experiences if we’re cutting funds for these critical programmes, and the administration is saying that you can’t consider race or ethnicity in healthcare?” In response, Kennedy claimed that there had been “tremendous duplication” in programmes and “we are investing huge amounts of money in maternal health.” The US has the highest maternal mortality rate in the developed world. ‘Reparenting’ black children? Representative Terri Sewell (centre) raised Kennedy’s comments that black children on ADHD medication should be “reparented” Describing various comments made by Kennedy as “outlandish and frankly disturbing”, Representative Terri Sewell took issue with his stating during a podcast interview that black children on ADHD medication should be “reparented”. “You said every black kid is now just standardly put on Adderall, SSRIs, benzos, which are known to induce violence, and that those children are going to have to go somewhere to get reparented,” said Sewell, reminding Kennedy that there was a long history of black children being removed from their parents, dating back to slavery. Despite Kennedy’s comments being recorded, he denied making them and said he “doesn’t even know what reparenting means”. Budget chief under pressure Meanwhile, health activists interrupted the testimony of Russell Vought, head of the US Office of Management and Budget (OMB), before the House Budget Committee on Wednesday. Minutes after Vought began his opening statement on the 2027 budget proposal, protesters tood up, holding up posters and shouting slogans accusing the Trump administration of killing people with HIV, and urging the administration to spend the funds Congress has allocated to the US President’s Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (PEPFAR). ”Russell Vought is directly responsible for illegally withholding Congressionally appropriated funds for PEPFAR and related global health initiatives. These funding disruptions have already contributed to preventable deaths and threaten to reverse decades of progress in the fight against HIV worldwide,” said Charles King, CEO of Housing Works, in a statement from the protestors issued by Health Gap. They accuse Vought of “blatant defiance of the will of Congress, which has fully funded PEPFAR programs for FY25 and FY26 over Vought’s objections, including by rejecting $400 million in rescission of PEPFAR funding in 2025.” “The FY27 President’s budget request for HIV and global health would eliminate HIV-specific and all disease-specific programming, while slashing overall global health funding by 46% compared with FY26 levels ($9.4 billion in FY26; $5.4 billion proposed in FY27 the President’s budget request),” according to the statement. “In addition to proposing deadly funding cuts, the FY27 budget request also disparages scientific evidence in global health, particularly regarding highly effective methods of HIV prevention, suggesting elimination of funding for condoms and programs for LGBTQ+ people, who face disproportionately high HIV risk of HIV infection due to criminalization and stigma,” according to the statement. Vought also recently diverted $15 million in USAID funding aimed at lifesaving humanitarian assistance to pay for his personal security, according to Reuters. Vought, former vice-president of the right-wing think tank Heritage Foundation, co-authored Project 2025, the conservative blueprint for governance being followed by the Trump administration. Posts navigation Older posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy Loading Comments... You must be logged in to post a comment.
‘A Unique Moment’: New Regional Air Pollution Plans Aim to Cut Health Burden Across Latin America 17/04/2026 Sophia Samantaroy Medellin, Colombia’s second largest city, is located in the northern Andes, where smog becomes trapped through meteorological temperature inversions. The Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO) will soon unveil a new Roadmap on Air Quality and Health, following on from a meeting with countries and other stakeholders in February in Mexico. The PAHO strategy dovetails with an ambitious new regional action plan by the UN Environment Programme – which supports the work of environment ministries. While the high mountains of the Andes might be associated in popular imagination with crystal clear air, in fact, these 4000+ meter high mountains also trap air pollution, smothering cities nestled in their towering ranges. It is visual testimony to the health impacts of an air pollution problem that kills some 370,000 people annually across Latin America and the Caribbean. But Latin American and Caribbean countries are at a “unique moment” in terms of opportunities to improve air quality, marking a critical pivot toward treating air pollution not merely as an environmental byproduct, but as a top-tier public health emergency, according to Juan J Castillo who leads the air quality team at PAHO, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) regional office for the Americas. “We see this action plan as an opportunity to send a strong message to the region, to the ministers of health and the environment, that there is a clear case for health in improving air quality,” said Juan Castillo. His team has been leading the plan’s development while also working to bolster collaboration across Latin America, connecting ministries of the environment and health, and closing the air pollution monitoring gap. Meeting the WHO goal to halve deaths from air pollution by 2040 Latin American cities are already taking climate adaptation measures, like Barranquilla, shown here. But air pollution experts highlight the health benefits of green urban desgin. The action plan comes a year after the World Health Organization’s second conference on Air pollution and health, hosted in Cartagena, Colombia. A core aim of the plan is to create a pathway for meeting the WHO target set out at the Cartagena meeting of halving deaths from air pollution by 2040. At the conference, some 20 countries, including many from the Latin American region, made related pledges. But the action plan aims to mainstream the goal into the plans of health ministries. Over 700 stakeholders gathered in Cartagena, Colombia, for the 2nd WHO Air Pollution and Health in 2025. “This is truly a pivotal point,” Castillo said. “Latin America requires solutions that respond to the specific needs of the region. This is why it is charting its own path towards cleaner air- and one that could inspire other lower- and middle-income nations, fostering further South-South cooperation.” Latin America and the Caribbean already have cleaner air, on average, than hot spots like South East Asia, there is still a long way to go to achieve the World Health Organization quality goals. Some cities in the region actually meet WHO air quality guidelines for particulate matter (PM2.5) and others exceed them “only” by one to two times. However, a number of cities in Chile, Brazil, Bolivia and Peru, have average annual PM2.5 concentrations reaching 3-5 times above WHO guidelines, according to the 2025 report of the Swiss-based monitoring firm, IQ-Air. Lima, Peru is one noteworthy example. The health argument for cleaner skies Local authorities in Lima, Peru promote cycling as part of a sustainable mobility effort. “The evidence shows that there is a huge burden of disease linked to air pollution in the region,” said Castillo. “Air pollution is one of the leading causes of non-communicable diseases and also for all kinds of morbidity, such as asthma attacks, respiratory infections and impaired cognitive development. So we’re focused on using the evidence to help countries make the best decision to achieve their public health goals.” Many countries in Latin America have implemented steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but these climate policies often neglect to consider the health benefits of tackling climate pollutants. These health impact assessments of climate mitigation are crucial and are included in the Organization’s Air Quality and Health Plan for Latin America and the Caribbean, said Castillo. “We need to understand the health gains to bolster the argument for environmental policies and to help with the strategic importance of these policies.” Integrating air quality action on climate change “can be particularly beneficial, as it broadens access to funding and delivers greater public health benefits,” notes a December 2025 regional action strategy by the UNEP-hosted Climate and Clean Air Coalition. Action needed beyond the health sector An all-electric bus in Brasilia is one of many rolled out across Latin America. The CCAC strategy is targeted to ministries of the environment, while the PAHO roadmap focuses on ministries of health. But the two aim to work in tandem to build political will for systemic changes that reduce air pollution. Such changes typically require action on finance, transport, building and household energy systems, urban design and waste management – well beyond the traditional domain of health ministries. In terms of transport, a major air pollution factor, Latin America historically has had stronger public transport systems than many other developing regions, and cities such as Curitiba and Bogota became pioneers in developing Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) as well as cycle networks, which helped reduce emissions from private automobiles. Baranquilla has pioneered several clean transport initiatives, such as electric buses, as shown in a Transformative Urban Mobility Initiative brochure. But too often, BRT systems in the region have remained too dependent on dirty diesel – where cleaner electric systems are needed to really clean up the air further. Now, there is a move to electrify BRT systems in key Latin American cities such as Brasilia, Brazil and Barranquilla, Colombia, supported partly by German development assistance as well as local initiatives. Barranquilla, Colombia, has undergone a massive urban renewal effort with the aim of shifting to a 50% electric bus fleet by 2034. Public transport is being integrated with cycle networks and pedestrian-friendly streets – about 30% of travel is on foot – supporting healthier, more active, and low-emissions mobility. PAHO hopes that more cities can see the health benefits of urban design – and use climate funding for greener cities that foster public health. Closing the monitoring and data gap The new PAHO roadmap advocates for better air quality monitoring to better inform policymakers. Tracking air quality progress has been a challenge for the region. Less than 40% of countries have a government standard for chronic exposure to the most dangerous form of particulate pollution, PM2.5. Without these standards, governments cannot chart further regulation to clean up polluted skies. The region has also struggled with tracking air quality. Only a third of cities in the region have active reference monitoring stations- or local inventories of criteria pollutant emissions, active air management programs, or government-published health impact assessments, according to the most recent regional action plan. And only seven cities have air quality forecasting systems. The data that is available raises several concerns. Of the 58 cities with PM2.5 data, only one city complies with the WHO guideline values. The region of Latin America and the Caribbean has, on average, enjoys cleaner air than South Asia or the African continent. Much of the poorer air quality is in urban centers and the Andean region. “Many cities lack key tools, or those that exist are not operational, up to date, or in use, while their populations remain exposed to harmful pollution levels,” says CCAC in its 2025 regional strategy. A consortium of South American researchers echoed that, in a 2025 review that stated: “South America would greatly benefit from expanded monitoring networks, improved air quality modeling, and detailed health data to better understand exposure–health relationships and multipollutant interactions.” Grassroots organizers like Ana Badillo, a co-founder of the Ecuador-based advocacy group Pacha Ayllu, have also championed access to real-time air quality data through the expanded use by “citizen-scientists” of low-cost air pollution sensors in the capital city of Quito. “This citizen-led monitoring network is designed to empower individuals and communities to better understand the quality of the air they breathe and make informed decisions to protect their health and that of their loved ones,” said Badillo in a recent post. The democratization of data is also central to the new CCAC strategy, which is promoting its AQMx Platform, a digital hub designed to support air quality management exchange and integrate conventional air quality monitoring with low-cost sensor networks, relying more on civil society groups like Pacha Ayllu. Collaborating across sectors At COP30 in Belém in 2025, Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus signaled a historic shift by formalizing the Belém Health Action Plan, highlighting the urgency of climate action for health. With funding an “obvious” challenge for cleaning up Latin America’s air, PAHO and its partners have emphasized the health gains of environmental interventions to help governments understand the strategic importance of such changes. In relation to that, collaboration across the energy and environmental sectors is key, says Castillo, whose office is also working closely with the UNEP-hosted CCAC. Tapping into energy sector investments also means cleaner, more affordable, and reliable energy. The new CCAC strategy targets not only air pollution, but a “triple planetary crisis” – climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution – by focusing on the reduction of “super pollutants” like black carbon and methane a precursor of ground level ozone (O3), as well as a powerful climate pollutant. But black carbon and methane do not remain long in the atmosphere, reductions can yield rapid gains for health as well as climate. By making air quality projects “bankable” for multilateral giants like the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), the plan seeks to move beyond sporadic grants toward a flexible financing architecture that includes green bonds and blended finance. Mexico City: a story of success A combination of Mexico City’s high population, geography, and occasional wildfires have made clean air a challenge for decades. Castillo pointed to the example of Mexico City, which once had some of the most polluted air in the Americas, or even the world, as a story of success. It was grassroots organizations that agitated for clean air protections. “They demanded action,” Castillo said. “And many other places are following suit.” Mexico City has developed a robust air quality monitoring system, NowCast – and one of the most ambitious goals for reducing short-lived climate pollutants in the region. “It has helped enormously in terms of health protection, because we can now warn people much sooner, telling them not to go outside, not to exercise outdoors and to avoid inhaling highly polluted air,” said Sergio Zirath, Mexico’s director general of Industry, Clean Energy and Air Quality Management in an interview with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Mexico has now stepped in to provide technical advice to other countries across the region on clean air solutions. Although this is an effort being led by PAHO, an organization that also includes Canada and the United States, by definition as a strategy for Latin America and the Caribbean, neither are part of this new strategy. “PAHO respects every country’s decision on how they want to manage their policy. Our focus is based on evidence, action and available data,” said Castillo, when asked about the absence of the US from regional clean air activities since the Trump administration took over in January 2025. But in the end, Castillo hopes this strategic plan – an undertaking that still includes 21 countries, civil society, and PAHO – will be more than “just another document.” Instead, he hopes it will provide countries with an opportunity to capitalize on changes already happening in the region – ones that might even clean up the air in the region’s worst-polluted cities suffering from smog buffered by the high Andes. Image Credits: Municipality of Bethlehem, S. Samantaroy/HPW, Partnerships for Health Cities, TUMI, IQAir, IQAir, WHO/PAHO/Karina Zambrana . From Vaccines to Racism: RFK Faces Barrage of Questions in House Committee 16/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan Representative Linda Sanchez (left) questioning Kennedy about the explosion of measles cases under his watch. Undermining vaccines, failing pregnant black women, threatening to remove black children with ADHD from their parents – these were some of the barrage of questions put to United States Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr when he appeared before the House Ways and Means Committee on Thursday. Kennedy was testifying about the Trump administration’s 2027 budget, which proposes to cut the HHS budget by 12,5% – including deep cuts for HIV programmes ($923 million less), maternal and child health ($561m), and mental health ($576m). The Trump 2027 budget also proposes to eliminate $4.3 billion from the US government’s global health budget, which falls under the US State Department. Massive measles increase There has been a 675% increase in measles cases since Kennedy was appointed in February last year, according to US Representative Linda Sanchez. “In 2024, under the Biden administration, there were 258 cases of measles. And in 2025, under your leadership at HHS, this ballooned to over 2,000 [cases]. That’s a 675% increase, and we are now on track to suppress to surpass that this year, with over 1,600 confirmed cases in just three and a half months,” said Sanchez. Pointing to the death last year of a six-year-old unvaccinated girl from measles, the first death of a US child from measles in a decade, Sanchez asked Kennedy whether a measles vaccine could have saved her life. “It’s possible,” Kennedy answered. Robert F Kennedy Jr testifying before the House Ways and Means Committee. Sanchez tore into Kennedy for orchestrating the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) decision to remove its “universal vaccine recommendations for children covering seven immunizations, including things like flu, covid, hepatitis A, hepatitis B and rotavirus.” She also quoted Kennedy’s claim on Fox News last year that the adverse effects from the measles vaccine “cause deaths every year… and causes all the illnesses that measles itself causes.” Sanchez said that “CDC data shows that about 80% of children who died from flu this season were not vaccinated, [and] the anti-vaccine rhetoric you ran on and the anti-vaccine actions you have taken over the last year clearly correlates with the dramatic increases in preventable diseases.” She asked Kennedy repeatedly whether Trump agreed with the CDC decision to “suspend public health messaging on vaccines last February” – but Kennedy dodged the question, claiming Sanchez has “a lot of misinformation”. Representative Mike Thompson said that Kennedy is “helping make diseases deadly again.” “Kids have died because measles is running rampant under your watch, in large part because President Trump allowed your conspiracy theories to run our public health,” said Thompson. Undermining health of black women “Black women are nearly three times more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than white women, yet the Trump administration is undermining black maternal health from all sides,” said Representative Danny Davis, a leader of the Congressional Black Caucus. He cited the Trump administration’s decision to cut $1 trillion from Medicaid, “which pays for 40% of births”, the proposed cuts to maternal and child care for 2027, and cuts to research. “DOGE [Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency] cancelled funds for several research projects that could save countless black mothers, like the Morehouse School of Medicine research on improving the health of black pregnant and postpartum women,” said Davis. “How can we lower black maternal health experiences if we’re cutting funds for these critical programmes, and the administration is saying that you can’t consider race or ethnicity in healthcare?” In response, Kennedy claimed that there had been “tremendous duplication” in programmes and “we are investing huge amounts of money in maternal health.” The US has the highest maternal mortality rate in the developed world. ‘Reparenting’ black children? Representative Terri Sewell (centre) raised Kennedy’s comments that black children on ADHD medication should be “reparented” Describing various comments made by Kennedy as “outlandish and frankly disturbing”, Representative Terri Sewell took issue with his stating during a podcast interview that black children on ADHD medication should be “reparented”. “You said every black kid is now just standardly put on Adderall, SSRIs, benzos, which are known to induce violence, and that those children are going to have to go somewhere to get reparented,” said Sewell, reminding Kennedy that there was a long history of black children being removed from their parents, dating back to slavery. Despite Kennedy’s comments being recorded, he denied making them and said he “doesn’t even know what reparenting means”. Budget chief under pressure Meanwhile, health activists interrupted the testimony of Russell Vought, head of the US Office of Management and Budget (OMB), before the House Budget Committee on Wednesday. Minutes after Vought began his opening statement on the 2027 budget proposal, protesters tood up, holding up posters and shouting slogans accusing the Trump administration of killing people with HIV, and urging the administration to spend the funds Congress has allocated to the US President’s Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (PEPFAR). ”Russell Vought is directly responsible for illegally withholding Congressionally appropriated funds for PEPFAR and related global health initiatives. These funding disruptions have already contributed to preventable deaths and threaten to reverse decades of progress in the fight against HIV worldwide,” said Charles King, CEO of Housing Works, in a statement from the protestors issued by Health Gap. They accuse Vought of “blatant defiance of the will of Congress, which has fully funded PEPFAR programs for FY25 and FY26 over Vought’s objections, including by rejecting $400 million in rescission of PEPFAR funding in 2025.” “The FY27 President’s budget request for HIV and global health would eliminate HIV-specific and all disease-specific programming, while slashing overall global health funding by 46% compared with FY26 levels ($9.4 billion in FY26; $5.4 billion proposed in FY27 the President’s budget request),” according to the statement. “In addition to proposing deadly funding cuts, the FY27 budget request also disparages scientific evidence in global health, particularly regarding highly effective methods of HIV prevention, suggesting elimination of funding for condoms and programs for LGBTQ+ people, who face disproportionately high HIV risk of HIV infection due to criminalization and stigma,” according to the statement. Vought also recently diverted $15 million in USAID funding aimed at lifesaving humanitarian assistance to pay for his personal security, according to Reuters. Vought, former vice-president of the right-wing think tank Heritage Foundation, co-authored Project 2025, the conservative blueprint for governance being followed by the Trump administration. Posts navigation Older posts This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy
From Vaccines to Racism: RFK Faces Barrage of Questions in House Committee 16/04/2026 Kerry Cullinan Representative Linda Sanchez (left) questioning Kennedy about the explosion of measles cases under his watch. Undermining vaccines, failing pregnant black women, threatening to remove black children with ADHD from their parents – these were some of the barrage of questions put to United States Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr when he appeared before the House Ways and Means Committee on Thursday. Kennedy was testifying about the Trump administration’s 2027 budget, which proposes to cut the HHS budget by 12,5% – including deep cuts for HIV programmes ($923 million less), maternal and child health ($561m), and mental health ($576m). The Trump 2027 budget also proposes to eliminate $4.3 billion from the US government’s global health budget, which falls under the US State Department. Massive measles increase There has been a 675% increase in measles cases since Kennedy was appointed in February last year, according to US Representative Linda Sanchez. “In 2024, under the Biden administration, there were 258 cases of measles. And in 2025, under your leadership at HHS, this ballooned to over 2,000 [cases]. That’s a 675% increase, and we are now on track to suppress to surpass that this year, with over 1,600 confirmed cases in just three and a half months,” said Sanchez. Pointing to the death last year of a six-year-old unvaccinated girl from measles, the first death of a US child from measles in a decade, Sanchez asked Kennedy whether a measles vaccine could have saved her life. “It’s possible,” Kennedy answered. Robert F Kennedy Jr testifying before the House Ways and Means Committee. Sanchez tore into Kennedy for orchestrating the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) decision to remove its “universal vaccine recommendations for children covering seven immunizations, including things like flu, covid, hepatitis A, hepatitis B and rotavirus.” She also quoted Kennedy’s claim on Fox News last year that the adverse effects from the measles vaccine “cause deaths every year… and causes all the illnesses that measles itself causes.” Sanchez said that “CDC data shows that about 80% of children who died from flu this season were not vaccinated, [and] the anti-vaccine rhetoric you ran on and the anti-vaccine actions you have taken over the last year clearly correlates with the dramatic increases in preventable diseases.” She asked Kennedy repeatedly whether Trump agreed with the CDC decision to “suspend public health messaging on vaccines last February” – but Kennedy dodged the question, claiming Sanchez has “a lot of misinformation”. Representative Mike Thompson said that Kennedy is “helping make diseases deadly again.” “Kids have died because measles is running rampant under your watch, in large part because President Trump allowed your conspiracy theories to run our public health,” said Thompson. Undermining health of black women “Black women are nearly three times more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than white women, yet the Trump administration is undermining black maternal health from all sides,” said Representative Danny Davis, a leader of the Congressional Black Caucus. He cited the Trump administration’s decision to cut $1 trillion from Medicaid, “which pays for 40% of births”, the proposed cuts to maternal and child care for 2027, and cuts to research. “DOGE [Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency] cancelled funds for several research projects that could save countless black mothers, like the Morehouse School of Medicine research on improving the health of black pregnant and postpartum women,” said Davis. “How can we lower black maternal health experiences if we’re cutting funds for these critical programmes, and the administration is saying that you can’t consider race or ethnicity in healthcare?” In response, Kennedy claimed that there had been “tremendous duplication” in programmes and “we are investing huge amounts of money in maternal health.” The US has the highest maternal mortality rate in the developed world. ‘Reparenting’ black children? Representative Terri Sewell (centre) raised Kennedy’s comments that black children on ADHD medication should be “reparented” Describing various comments made by Kennedy as “outlandish and frankly disturbing”, Representative Terri Sewell took issue with his stating during a podcast interview that black children on ADHD medication should be “reparented”. “You said every black kid is now just standardly put on Adderall, SSRIs, benzos, which are known to induce violence, and that those children are going to have to go somewhere to get reparented,” said Sewell, reminding Kennedy that there was a long history of black children being removed from their parents, dating back to slavery. Despite Kennedy’s comments being recorded, he denied making them and said he “doesn’t even know what reparenting means”. Budget chief under pressure Meanwhile, health activists interrupted the testimony of Russell Vought, head of the US Office of Management and Budget (OMB), before the House Budget Committee on Wednesday. Minutes after Vought began his opening statement on the 2027 budget proposal, protesters tood up, holding up posters and shouting slogans accusing the Trump administration of killing people with HIV, and urging the administration to spend the funds Congress has allocated to the US President’s Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (PEPFAR). ”Russell Vought is directly responsible for illegally withholding Congressionally appropriated funds for PEPFAR and related global health initiatives. These funding disruptions have already contributed to preventable deaths and threaten to reverse decades of progress in the fight against HIV worldwide,” said Charles King, CEO of Housing Works, in a statement from the protestors issued by Health Gap. They accuse Vought of “blatant defiance of the will of Congress, which has fully funded PEPFAR programs for FY25 and FY26 over Vought’s objections, including by rejecting $400 million in rescission of PEPFAR funding in 2025.” “The FY27 President’s budget request for HIV and global health would eliminate HIV-specific and all disease-specific programming, while slashing overall global health funding by 46% compared with FY26 levels ($9.4 billion in FY26; $5.4 billion proposed in FY27 the President’s budget request),” according to the statement. “In addition to proposing deadly funding cuts, the FY27 budget request also disparages scientific evidence in global health, particularly regarding highly effective methods of HIV prevention, suggesting elimination of funding for condoms and programs for LGBTQ+ people, who face disproportionately high HIV risk of HIV infection due to criminalization and stigma,” according to the statement. Vought also recently diverted $15 million in USAID funding aimed at lifesaving humanitarian assistance to pay for his personal security, according to Reuters. Vought, former vice-president of the right-wing think tank Heritage Foundation, co-authored Project 2025, the conservative blueprint for governance being followed by the Trump administration. Posts navigation Older posts