Incentives For EU Pharmaceutical R&D – New Review

A new series of briefing documents aimed at helping European Union (EU) policymakers tackle high medicines prices has been released by the non-profit think tank, Medicines Law and Policy.

The briefing series was developed in the context of a European Union review of EU pharmaceutical incentive mechanisms, launched in 2016 and still ongoing. In its announcement of the review, the European Council had expressed concerns over “an increasing number of examples of market failure in a number of Member States, where patients access to effective and affordable essential medicines is endangered by very high and unsustainable price levels.”

Ellen ‘t Hoen of Medicines Law & Policy, one of the authors, said in a press release that the recommendations contained in the series are aimed at creating greater balance between prices and pharma incentives.

“The pharmaceutical industry now benefits from a web of protections in the EU that together delay market competition for long periods and allow companies to set profit-maximising prices that are unaffordable for many,” she said. “We offer recommendations to ensure that adequate incentives for pharmaceutical innovation exist while access to these innovations is not jeopardised.”

The briefing series focuses on five key principles for policy-making, which its authors contend are important to patients and markets:

  • Adequate incentives for research and development are important, but there must be a clearer link between risk and reward;
  • Historical reasons underpinning the EU’s generous data and market exclusivity system are no longer valid;
  • The concept of ‘sufficient’ profit should guide policymakers, but ‘sufficiency’ estimates should be driven by transparency in medicine costs and pricing;
  • Flexibilities inherent in patent law should not be rendered ineffective by exclusive rights granted through the medicines regulatory system;
  • The EU should not use trade agreements to demand that third countries implement more stringent intellectual property protection than required under WTO rules.

Image Credits: Medicines Law & Policy, Medicines Law & Policy .